Information operations

Tragic Gray State fallout: "Sandy Hook Hoaxer" stalker troll squad turns against Minnesota Truthers & late filmmaker David Crowley's family & friends in bizarre twist

If you want to help stop acting crazy so we can tell our loved ones that there is nothing to worry about. All the conspiracy buzz is freaking them out. They are afraid some of you lunatics are gonna come for them thinking we are covering stuff up.
One of late director David Crowley's friends begging the hoaxers to lay off before the funeral

One of the more disgusting displays I've ever seen on the Internet has gone down in the last week or so, with a bunch of creepy cats and sockpuppets emerging seemingly from nowhere to disparage the friends and family of the late David Crowley, a Minnesota alternative filmmaker who investigators currently believe shot himself as well as his wife and daughter. Unfortunately today this has escalated into veiled threats against at least one of Crowley's friends as well, a horrible display.

To cut a long and stupid story short, the core of this network of people are best known as the "Sandy Hook Hoaxers" who have now latched onto a new tragedy to wrap themselves in and give their lives meaning. Until now, I've never seen gangstalking instigated against Truthers after a tragedy, even before the funerals. These are the very same key people who have been harassing various families in Newtown Connecticut, generally creeping and making fools of themselves. They are the operators of Sandy Hook Hoax facebook group and friends.

While both the Sandy Hook shooting and the unfortunate demise of David Crowley & his family are both tragic and weird, these tragedies are seized upon by really unbalanced people who go crusading around after whoever they can find, in an effort to draw attention to themselves.

This mob of sick troll behavior also quite effectively wrecks the efforts of more principled "citizen investigators" or Truthers that attempt to discern the truth in these matters, not continuously verbally abuse the townspeople so to speak. This could be termed "poisoning the well" or "muddying the waters". Nowadays even people Obama cites in speeches get this treatment.

//// UPDATE 1/29: Brandan Hunt reiterates some points (w credits to this post) on a Youtube video which seems an accurate summary. Thanks! ////

A "poisoning the well" example in Sandy Hook: many of these hoaxers latched onto the memes and frame of "dallasgoldbug" who is notorious for claiming political figures are actually actors, like Steve Buscemi is actually Terrence McKenna for example. This delusion got thrown at seemingly everyone in Newtown CT, which also effectively helps poison research on the issue should covert operators actually use 'crisis actors' in some shady event.

Naturally this same delusion got directed at Crowley's friends and acquaintances - for some reason these people with the yellow 9/11 USA avatars are seemingly devoid of discernment and decency:

same-person.png

So-called "Justice for David Crowley & family" group run by full fruitbats: The Sandy Hook Hoaxer trolls are flocking to this new tragedy. Here, for example, the sole group administrator, Daniel Michael Hennen of Chaska, says that Crowley's friends, on Instagram sharing a laugh together on the same day they did media interviews on two local networks, are "the four guys who have the 'most to gain' from David Crowley NOT being alive. Let that sink in." and "...They have the most to gain with david six feet under, that's all." [Not run by the same person as this other page, which is not attacking the family or friends]

Hennen is essentially unknown to Crowley's friends, but has started a whole bunch of "Justice for X" groups of which he is always the sole administrator. This group is by far the most popular with 700+ people. Here he's attempting to demonize Crowley's friends using a favorite old Sandy Hook theory that bereaved people apparently never smile again. ("it takes me back to the Sandy Hook days…" as he tries to live within that tragedy's fallout.)

blame-friends.png blame-friends2.png

The day before, Hennen posited that Crowley's brother was "jealous" and therefore had a major motive to murder his own brother and his family. And earlier today he said that one of Crowley's close friends "certainly needs his ass kicked." Hennen's kept the innuendoes against David's brother rolling today:

blame-brother.png

Here is today's veiled threat against Crowley's friend Sean - I'm posting the both the folded and unfolded versions:


assault-sean-threat.png assault-sean-threat2.png

On this thread first it's worth noting that Minnesotan Michael Okishoff has some criminal convictions for domestic issues (and not surprisingly tried to order around female group members in private chats). Okishoff is also attempting to raise money in a GoFundMe he claims will ultimately be turned over for family medical bills, as a clone of a legitimate fundraising campaign Crowley's brother started.

Here we have the Sandy Hook Hoaxer rabbit hole of madness: As noted last May by CW Wade, Thomas Lapp has been cited as involved in cyberstalking Newtown parents and children, as well as his friend Tony Mead, also highly active on this group. Dan Hennen wrote a piece defending flagship hoaxer Wolfgang Halbig in March 2014. Wolfgang apparently briefly checked into this new group and then bounced.

Another Sandy Hook alt media writer, Brandan Hunt, traced Wolfgang Halbig's operations and circle of troll friends: SANDY HOOK: Wolfgang Halbig is a LIAR (Video Presentation, Transcript + Downloads) - Brendan Hunt.com. Halbig has adeptly scammed people who hope that some light can be shed on Sandy Hook.

Unfortunately apparently Jim Fetzer has been all over this bad behavior with Sandy Hook as well, embarrassing more respectful alternative researchers. Apparently he started promoting dallasgoldbug ages ago.

If anything the accusations and paranoia leveled by Hennen, Lapp and Mead resemble when another horrible middle aged hoaxer, Rick Santilli, accused Jim Fetzer of a role in murdering a Truther in Uptown Minneapolis several years ago, which I found appalling (and almost finished writing a post about shortly after it happened).

These kind of crazy accusations against other researchers and their friends is part of how this bitter conspiracy troll class seems to bond, and the more people call them out, the more they bunker up into their own worldview. More Sandy Hook links below...

////

Sean messaged me the same block message and suggests that we not engage Hennen or his hoaxer friends anymore, and instead go with the copypasta. I am including Sean's message here so it's not lost in the shuffle - linebreaks added for clarity:

dan michael hennen you coward... you take a few sentences of our conversation and share that why would you not share the whole thing... Like I said on the phone respect and rights are 2 completely different things, and when it comes to this you have neither. I will not let you get me angry, you do not have that power nor the respect to even let you cloud my thoughts through all of this. What I am happy to see is the true friends of mine, family and gray state team who have put countless hours to try and reason with your delusional false empathetic gestures.

But obviously you are a sociopath and unable to decipher with rational reason or emotion. I most feel sorry for your children. a message to all who are trying to rationalize with this psychotic please do not waste your time he is in this only to fulfill his sick needs of torment and has lacked the ability to deal with his inner demons im sure that he is sick and needs help. even through his hatred and disrespect for this situation I still have hope for him that he will one day learn respect and honor, for the only reason is that you have children. You are so lucky I am where I am mentally and have only strived to improve myself daily that I will never be the reason you look over your shoulder.

I cannot speak for others but all you have done is put yourself as the target for misguided anger, I pray that no one would ever harm you as that would be against the crowleys wishes and disappoint me. as far as any and all of my friends please do as I and the family and friends are doing and ignore these trolls. Dan is the one who has to look at himself and tho he might not see any of his actions as wrong that is just an apparent red flag is his sickness. Sean Wright, family friend of David Komel and Raniya

/// I sean Wright Give Dan Feidt full permission to troll Dan hennen with my comment and think this will be enough to get him to stop but we do not need to waste any of our time on him other than clicking "control v" that is all the respect he deserves, he does not deserve any actualy intellectual responses from any of us please keep our anger harnessed as it will only fulfill his sick mind. Thank you respectfully Sean Wright 1/25/2014

Before I realized that this was the Sandy Hook Hoaxer troll squad I posted the following to the group, a few days ago:

The statement from the group admin "In some circles, HE committed the crimes." referring to someone in Crowley's immediate family is a dangerous and defamatory statement to peg on the internet especially when David's actual real-world friends have warned plenty of times that they and the family are worried about unbalanced people coming after them. This followed an ad hominem attack saying anyone who doesn't believe it wasn't a murder/suicide is missing something obvious to a 5th grade education.

Detaching from reality and asserting an alternate one "In some circles, HE committed the crimes" as opposed to stating "some circles believe that" is defamatory and makes the situation more dangerous. There are mentally ill people sucked into this thing now and if you don't put some boundaries, especially defamation of family members, things are going to get worse, not better, and that is shameful.

Making ad hominem attacks about people who don't buy these speculative storylines peddled around all week is also the shortcut to failing to achieve any "truth" or justice and the lack of class shown in this moment is appalling.

Sean posted this back on the 22nd, before things got even crazier (check the thread from hell):

Please stop with the accusations of an inside job, and its our right to upload video thats not your work. Trolling is pointless. Us friends and fam have issued statements, met w press, and have been very accomodating due to the suspiciousness of the tragic events which took place. To settle the trolls:

Not a conspiracy of murder.

David did not receive 30 mil.

Not going to confirm any facts of the investigation until its complete and delivered to family.

The rise was only rough cut for a reason it was never meant to be publicly viewed. He put that up 2 years so we could help him with stuff he needed input on.

The 2nd cut and 3 are way different than the rough cut.

The finsl cut is what david wanted released and that will come out in time, first we must bury our friends and let the investigation take place there is a ton of information to go thru and so much more piling in daily. I have faith in the detectives working this case as does the family and rest of close friends.

We are not covering anything up.

We are carefully sharing what we can. We need to get access to all the pages to insure accurate information is released.

Too many people are trying to get their name out in vein of this event. david was on bring of many projects (cant disclose publicly and cuz of all that is going on from speculation you see why)

Only facts out is they went out painlessly and not a conspiracy. Please stop with the nonsense its scaring our loved ones and we have been so busy we have not even been able to begin to grieve. Its not fair to us.

If you want to help stop acting crazy so we can tell our loved ones that there is nothing to worry about. All the conspiracy buzz is freaking them out. They are afraid some of you lunatics are gonna come for them thinking we are covering stuff up.

Please have class and respect for the dead if not for me then please for the families of the deceased.

I had to tell my daughter her friend and whole family died. She was only able to smile when i told her paleo is ok. Stop scaring my loved ones. Put urself in our shoes how could you handle this better than we are i would love to know (not).

Danny August Mason Adam Shambour Mason Norsk Hest and have not had a second to grieve. Please give us the same respect the families deserve. Please respect david komel and rani and their families.

today we did 2 interviews w msm, that was shadowed by the release of the rough cut. Tomorrow ben swann interview. Family set up fund raiser and taking care of funerals wakes and everything else that has to be done.

///

Earlier vultures perch: I thought it was contemptible that Kevin Barrett immediately blamed the Mossad for this tragedy via Iranian state media PressTV site, without a particle of evidence. The ever-trashy Southern Poverty Law Center of course has a field day with all the fruitbattery and re-posting Crowley's videos under "hatewatch". Of course SPLC cites the stalker/hoaxer Thomas Lapp to prove their overall persistent point, that generally alt-media people are dangerous and prone to inducing violence.

///

Other Sandy Hook related material: For example this enters into the topic of the Sandy Hook Hoaxers and their military intelligence links: Sandy Hook Stalkers | Tracking the Vultures and Predators of the Sandy Hook Elementary School Massacre - a number of specific hoaxes they've run in the Sandy Hook context. Hoaxers Put Sandy Hook Parents in Their Crosshairs | Sandy Hook Stalkers

Wolfgang’s Bad Company « Memory Hole: A prominent researcher on Sandy Hook James F Tracy explained that shadowy people tried to get him to peddle the crisis actors meme, and when he turned them down, then they started putting Wolfgang at the head of the hoaxer troll pack. Unfortunately he gave stalker Tony Mead space on his site in July as well, but this is probably the first thing worth reading about this mess:

"Those in the 9/11 Truth movement are well aware of the “cognitive infiltrators” who are only too happy to harness a loose cannon or two that will sabotage or otherwise hinder the genuine remedy of collective intelligence. I am aware that at least one of the parties who misinformed me is now operating as Wolfgang Halbig’s handler."

Via Brandan Hunt (xrayultra): EXPOSED - The Secret Troll Network Preying on the Truth Movement: Montagraph, October Reignz, CaliberHitter… "Try your best not to internalize their bullshit. Instead, speak out, but don’t spend any more of your precious time exposing these freaks than is absolutely necessary. It will distract you from the good work you do, and indeed, that is the goal." Great advice. Also: Sandy Hook Truth Movement takeover by Disinfo Agents & Morons - YouTube

Sandy Hook Hoax admins are LIARS [Videos + Transcript] - Brendan Hunt:

"folks who are posing as truth-seekers and online researchers, but are actually injecting disinformation into the communities that are looking into 9/11, the JFK assassination, and things like Sandy Hook…. Lenny Pozner’s recent editorial on Sandy Hook truthers which singled out Tony Mead and Wolfgang Halbig as some of the more toxic individuals in the community. I’m not saying I trust Pozner at all, but since the truther community hasn’t really taken a hard-line stance against these frauds, as I’ve tried to encourage, the media can hold them up as examples of the research community and say “See! We told you these truthers were bad!” These crazed individuals, such as Tony Mead and Erik Pearson, ReviewManify aka TeamWakeEmUp, Thomas Lapp, FreeRadioRevolution and his idiot pal RedPillRevolution, Odinrok, Jim Fetzer and the Veteran’s Today crew, and George Mason are all pissed at me for calling them out on the lies they've tried to perpetrate upon the truth movement."

Much of the same crew now turned against the MN Truthers via this group. Also: SANDY HOOK: Wolfgang Halbig is a LIAR (Video Presentation, Transcript + Downloads) - Brendan Hunt.com

Tracker blog: Sandy Hook Hoax Hall Of Shame

Satirizing hoaxers: Sandy Hook Hoax Hoaxers and Sandy Hook Hoaxers Are Not Bright

CW Wade's debunking site (also here) including on Wolfgang trying to demand identities of children. Sandy Hook- Facts & Research: Sandy Hook Hoax Erik Pearson and Tony Mead Continue Stalking of Victims

This is one of the hoaxer pages: Sandy Hook Hoax mainly promoting Wolfgang Halbig.

WillyLoman: Rainmaker Wolfgang Halbig – A Pure Fraud in the Classic Sense | American Everyman - March 2014

Unfortunately Tony Mead has been posting at ActivistPost (Aug 2014). Typical stuff. Another hoaxer site. They defend themselves from stalking charges in a convoluted post here.

Identity hijacking from Tony Mead's friends at InsaneMedia: Insanemedia Caught Stealing Woman’s Identity To Promote Sandy Hook Conspiracy Theory | Newtown Post-Examiner, see also “We Need To Talk About Sandy Hook” Stalker Craven S Moorehead aka Swansong aka Swan | Newtown Post-Examiner: "In a previous post on the Sandy Hook Stalkers blog, Craven S Moorehead was shown to be partnered with Katja Bush, the wife of Captain Lashon Bush of the U.S. Army Cyber Command– all three of whom our team found linked to the IP-phishing Insanemedia website. For those unfamiliar, Tony Mead’s Sandy Hook Hoax Facebook page is where Hoaxers (those who believe that the SHES massacre was a government “false flag” operation) gather to spew libelous accusations and plot strategies to harass and intimidate those personally affected by the SHES tragedy. Their stalking and predations occur on a daily basis and have been well documented by those of us who have been monitoring their activities." Seems legit.

Delusional Internet postings saying Sandy Hook was a hoax deny the pain and anguish of parents, relatives and Newtown residents - Hartford Courant by Lenny Pozner, parent of one of the dead kids. July 25 2014:

Unfortunately, there still exists a small but obsessive faction of hoaxers who are either unable or unwilling to objectively discern the hard facts from among the fleeting hunches and groundless accusations. Others are well aware of the truth but exploit the tragedy for their own aggrandizement. Regardless of their motivation, all have one thing in common: They persist in stalking and harassing the Sandy Hook parents and others intimately connected to the tragedy.

Among their most active leaders is Tony Mead, apparently a resident of Florida. For several months, this serial cyber stalker has hosted a Facebook page where he has amassed a cult following of like-minded hoaxers who ravenously feed off each other's paranoia and hatred for anyone who was affected by the Sandy Hook tragedy.

This is not a place where meaningful discussions are held or investigative inquiries are made. This is a place where strategies are plotted against grieving relatives and children's identities are stolen and exploited to fulfill a twisted fantasy.

This is exactly the network that has now turned against the Minnesota Truthers and Crowley's friends and family.

HAL-BIG IS WOLF’S GANG? | THE CONSPIRACY CRITIC (March 2014)

The persistent Glenn Canady shills for VT, Wolfgang & Fetzer etc: The Sandy Hook "Smoking Gun": Game Set Match! | Alternative

Conspiracy cats more likely to conspire? Seems like this type all right: Does it take one to know one? New research reveals conspiring conspiracy theorists — ScienceDaily

There is even a counter-harassment org set up now: HONR Network: Report Harassment, Sandy Hook Hoaxers, Conspiracy Theories

Rather than focusing their delusional grievances and accusations on authorities, the ‘hoaxers’ take the path of least resistance, harassing and emotionally abusing the victims’ family members online, on the telephone, and even in person. This practice allows them to feel as though they are doing something productive to have their voices heard, while staying safely away from the clutches of the authorities. This is a cowardly approach to having their grievances heard, and we need to ensure that they find some other method of doing so which doesn’t directly affect victims’ family members, or anyone else involved in the management of the tragedies, such as emergency service workers or those who were in any way involved. Even these individuals have found themselves the target of hoaxer hostility and harassment.

///

Unfortunately until such disgusting tactics are railed out of the Truther world, we will continue to see investigations around tragedies like Sandy Hook and the Crowley family backfire horribly. To paraphrase what one of Crowley's Truther friends told me, he was damn near ready to switch into believing the official 9/11 story simply because of these appalling people. My condolences to all.

On a final note, I was able to exchange email with the late Crowley about the Oct 2013 draft cut of his film Gray State: The Rise, but I will hold those comments over for another time. There are other relevant statements, social media items and images that clearly show Crowley was going into a dark place. But this post is focused on the ugly troll crowd that wants to find another tragedy to cling to, with Sandy Hook now becoming a messy, opaque memory.

[Full research credit to Scott Wilson who originally flagged the Sandy Hook Hoaxer squad's existence on the fruitbat group, thank you.]

EXCLUSIVE: Such Critical Infrastructures: FBI feeds Anonymous IRC channels to CIA, Pentagon intel, NSA, NORTHCOM in 2012 Intel memo

An FBI "IIR" intelligence report, dated April 12 2012 entitled "Identification of Internet Relay Chat (IRC) Channels Used by Anonymous Members, as of 12 April 2012" surfaces a dicey realm between US military & intelligence and electronic activists. The full report is at scribd.com/doc/246922867/FBI-FOIA-IRC-Chat-Channels-used-by-Anonymous // (Mobile) /// UPDATE: Upvote this post on Reddit & Thanks to YAN for amplifying!

FBI FOIA IRC Chat Channels used by Anonymous by Smiley Hill

A tiny peek into a huge deal: the potential fracas between assorted would-be American military cyberwar commandoes and international (and domestic!) computer activists. This lower-level report (Unclassified//For Official Use Only) (U//FOUO) perhaps is more interesting for its "metadata" rather than thoroughly censored content. Below I also included some other domestic military operations documents below to draw a wider context than just this "cyberwar" stuff, as Ferguson has prompted Gov. Nixon in Missouri to activate the state militia, it's good to read up on what federal legal doctrine for "civil disturbances" is.

fbi-iir1.png
fbi-iir2.png
fbi-iir3.png

Such recipients: In order, it says it is from "DIRECTOR FBI" to:

All FBI field offices

INFO AFOSI DET 331 Andrews AFB Maryland, Headquarters Air Force Office of Special Investigations (also cited in this case http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/homeland_defense/intelligence/EFF_vs_DOD_Bates_997_1096.pdf )

CDR USSTRATCOM Offutt AFB Nebraska, Strategic Command commander

CDR USTRANSCOM Scott AFB Illinois, United States Transportation Command commander

CDR1STIO Ft Belvoir Virginia, First Information Operations Command commander - https://www.1stiocmd.army.mil/ (wat? "CDR1STIO" pops in a bunch of other FOIA'd IIRs as well if you googlize it)

CIA WASHINGTON DC - always down for a good time

DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY WASHINGTON DC - yes, this hot info wasn't stovepiped away from rivals

DEPT OF JUSTICE WASHINGTON DC - fetching banhammer

DEPT OF STATE WASHINGTON DC

DIA WASHINGTON DC - Defense Intelligence Agency which is huge and low profile - http://www.dia.mil/

DIRNAVCRIMINVSERV - Probably HEADQUARTERS. NAVAL CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIVE SERVICE.

DNI WASHINGTON DC - Director of National Intelligence. (Clapper at the time)

HQ AFOSI Andrews AFB Maryland - Air Force Office of Special Investigations. Tip, if you have some message for them, use their unencrypted contact form to let them know about fraud or etc. What could possibly go wrong? > http://www.osi.af.mil/main/contactus.asp

HQ NORAD USNORTHCOM INTEL PETERSON AFB - US Northern Command located near Colorado Springs was created as Dept of Homeland Security's military counterpart for "Homeland Defense", an elastic concept extending Pentagon involvement with "critical infrastructure," namely the machinery of major corporations. They also revised "GARDEN PLOT" into CONPLAN 3502 Civil Disturbance Operations," relevant in a Ferguson type context under federal mobilization. (see 2010 story) They were also written into Superman's plot.

JOINT STAFF Washington DC - J2 - Director for Intelligence (J2) on the Joint Chiefs of Staff (now this guy)

JWAC DAHLGREN Virginia - Joint Warfare Analysis Center a "premier science and engineering institution" under Strategic Command (USSTRATCOM), which also hosts Cyber Command. see http://www.stratcom.mil/functional_components/

NGA HQ Bethesda Maryland. The National Geospatial Intelligence Agency, like DIA, is up to a lot of things off the radar. They have domestic satellite spying (GEO INT) responsibilities at National Special Security Events which require a special domestic military intel privacy waiver. http://www.stratcom.mil/functional_components/ . Big spenders.

NSA FT GEORGE G MEADE Maryland - National Security Agency at the oddly spelled out Ft Meade. I wonder how many land in this inbox - and how many times "George G" is stored in their databases.

US SECRET SERVICE WASHINGTON DC

USCYBERCOM FT GEORGE G MEADE Maryland - Cyber Command in ur router, sniffin ur packets

WHITE HOUSE SITUATION ROOM WASHINGTON DC.

BT . … I am fairly sure this is a closing list tag like </UL>

////

Serial IIR 4 213 4003 12, "WARNING (U): This is an information report, not finally evaluated intelligence. It is being shared for informational purposes but has not been fully evaluated, integrated with other information, interpreted or analyzed. Receiving agencies are requested not to take action based on this raw reporting without prior coordination with the FBI. Unless a conviction in a criminal proceeding occurs, a presumption of innocence exists for any person being reported on in this IIR." Declassification date appears 20370607, as this hot stuff needs to lay low for a couple more decades.

What is an IIR? It is pretty low level stuff for the FBI. For a bit of info see FBI Intelligence Information Report Handbook | Electronic Frontier Foundation. That document interestingly, at the very end includes a statutory info pipeline from Grand Jury operations to various feds. Patriot Act Section 203(a)(1)( C )(i)(V) certainly makes for an industrious star chamber circuit, but they don't want grand jury info going out in IIRs without asking the HQ attorney.

This document was obtained by Smiley Hill via FOIA. Please follow https://twitter.com/smilyus for more smileable FOIAs on a regular basis.

////

The use of the military - and these contractors in the game now - to police corporate systems labeled as Critical Infrastructure is significant. After all, Missouri Gov Nixon just activated the state militia because of Ferguson.

ferguson-crop2.png ferguson-crop1.png

In the recent FBI writeup freeking out about Ferguson protesters, I took the "critical infrastructure" references to allude to authorizing military activity around corporate electronic assets that might get poked at by angry activists.

“The announcement of the grand jury’s decision … will likely be exploited by some individuals to justify threats and attacks against law enforcement and critical infrastructure,” the FBI says in an intelligence bulletin issued in recent days. “This also poses a threat to those civilians engaged in lawful or otherwise constitutionally protected activities.”

fergusoncrop.png

////

Background on Executive Order 13636:

See NSA's cybersecurity program to protect critical infrastructure revealed - Military & Aerospace Electronics

Feb 2013: Executive Order -- Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity | The White House

CRS analysis on Executive Order: http://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42984.pdf

Feb 2013: Pentagon will require security standards for critical infrastructure networks - Nextgov.com

This is actually a word? Cyberinfrastructure - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nov 2012: Cyber Order Puts DHS In Charge Of Oversight, Sets Deadlines « Breaking Defense - Defense industry news, analysis and commentary

USA TODAY: Feb 2013: Cybersecurity executive order fosters information sharing for greater good

As for the legal ramifications of domestic military operations and targeting electronic activists with tools like STRATCOM / CYBERCOM retain for battling Al Qaeda servers or whatever, most people say "But, Posse Comitatus!" In reality a vast area of domestic military operations has been expanded and operated by JAGs. See : www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/pdf/operational-law-handbook_2012.pdf

This Domestic Operational Law Cyber Realm has a Handbook, People!

DomesticOperationalLaw2011.png

The domestic version of this JAG manual is extremely recommended reading for everyone. See Domestic Operational Law Handbook for Judge Advocates 2011 | Public Intelligence.

Also the newer 248 page Domestic Operational Law Handbook for Judge Advocates 2013 | Public Intelligence is available. You will definitely know moar about WTF is up with weird meshes of civilian/military authority in the US by skimming over this.

PI highlighted a bunch of good 2011 stuff, since we are talking Ferguson anyway, it's worth noting again:

G. The Department of Defense Civil Disturbance Plans

Formerly, DoD’s Civil Disturbance Operations (CDO) plan was known as “GARDEN PLOT.” Since the creation of the Department of Homeland Security and USNORTHCOM however, DoD has delegated to geographic combatant commanders responsibility for developing CDO Contingency Plans (CONPLANs). These geographic commanders’ CONPLANs provide guidance and direction for planning, coordinating, and executing military operations during domestic civil disturbances.

1. Civil Disturbance Operations Mission

Broadly stated, the CDO mission assists civil authorities in restoring law and order in the United States and its territories.58 This mission statement, while not duplicating the language in the Insurrection Act allowing for the use of federal forces to “suppress” insurrection, provides wide latitude to the President to use federal forces to assist civil law enforcement in “restoring” law and order.

The restoration of law and order must be distinguished from the preservation of law and order. CDO mission statements do not allow the joint civil disturbance task force commander to undertake preservation missions. It is generally agreed that missions to restore law and order include dispersing unauthorized assemblages, patrolling disturbed areas, maintaining essential transportation and communications systems, setting up roadblocks, and cordoning off areas. Care should be taken before a military commander accepts missions that are routine maintenance of civil order.

2. Combatant Commanders’ CONPLANs

The CONPLANs provide the basis for all preparation, deployment, employment, and redeployment of Department of Defense component forces, including National Guard forces called to active federal service, for use in domestic civil disturbance operations, in support of civil authorities as directed by the President. The concept of a civil disturbance operation is multi-phased: Phase 0, Shape; Phase I, Anticipate; Phase II, Respond (deployment can occur in either Phase I or Phase II); Phase III, Operate; Phase IV, Stabilize; and Phase V, Transition (redeployment). Prior to deployment, military forces maintain five preparedness postures, called Civil Disturbance Conditions (CIDCONS) in order to alert and react to potential civil disturbance operations. Changes in the CIDCON level are directed by the JDOMS.

3. The Standing Rules for the Use of Force for U.S. Forces

Civil disturbance operations are conducted in accordance with Appendix L of the Standing Rules of Engagement/Standing Rules for the Use of Force for U.S. Forces (SRUF). Guidance on how and when forces can use force in a CDO mission are detailed in that annex. Although the CJCSI is classified, Annex L is not and can be shared with our mission partners.

a. Custody and Detention

All apprehensions should be made by the civil police force unless they are not available or require assistance. Military forces have the authority to detain rioters, looters, or other civilians committing criminal offenses. Civilians taken into custody should be transferred to civilian law enforcement authorities as soon as possible.

All members of the force must remember that state and federal criminal law and procedure govern apprehension. Apprehension is justified only on the basis of probable cause to believe that an offense has been committed and that the person to be apprehended committed the offense. Soldiers should not question detainees beyond basic pedigree such as name and address. If formal questioning of an offender is necessary, civilian police should conduct the interview. If civilian police are not available, CID agents or military police may conduct interviews only if the interview is essential to the civil disturbance mission. Actions taken by Soldiers that do not conform to criminal law constitutional standards could jeopardize future prosecution and subject Soldiers and their Commanders to criminal and/or civil liability.

b. Search and Seizure

CDO CONPLANs anticipate that military forces will generally not be involved in searches unless there is “an immediate danger of violence, destruction of evidence, or escape of violent persons unless the search is conducted without delay.” In all other cases, local authorities should conduct searches. When required to perform searches, federal armed forces may conduct warrantless searches under the same constitutional parameters imposed upon law enforcement officials. Joint Civil Disturbance Task Force forces conducting a warrantless search will fully document the reasons for the search as soon as is reasonably convenient.69 Generally these searches are limited to the following incidents.

(1) Stop and Frisk

If there is a reasonable suspicion based upon articulable facts that a person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime, that person may be temporarily stopped and questioned about his activities. The stop must be limited in duration to that which is reasonably necessary to investigate the suspicion. If there is a reasonable suspicion based on articulable facts that a person is armed or is carrying instruments of violence and that the individual presents an immediate risk of harm, members of the armed force may conduct a “frisk” (an external “patdown” of the clothing) for weapons. Any weapons found during a frisk may be removed from the individual and seized.

(2) Search Incident to Lawful Apprehension

A person lawfully detained may be searched for weapons or destructible evidence. A search for weapons or destructible evidence may also be conducted in the area where the detained person could reach with a sudden movement to obtain a weapon or destroy evidence.

(3) Exigent circumstances

Military forces assisting law enforcement may make a search without a warrant when they have reason to believe (probable cause) that weapons, objects related to criminal activity, or persons believed to have committed an offense, are in the place to be searched; and they have reason to believe that the delay necessary to obtain a search warrant would result in removal of the weapons or destruction of the objects related to criminal activity. For example, Joint Civil Disturbance Task Force forces may stop and search an automobile without a warrant when there is reason to believe that the automobile contains weapons or instruments of violence and/or contains an individual reasonably believed to have committed violence.

(4) Emergency

Military forces in a civil disturbance operation may make an immediate entry into a building when there is reason to believe that entry is necessary to prevent injury to persons, serious damage to property, loss of evidence, to protect public safety, or to render aid to someone who is in danger.

(5) Hot pursuit

Military forces pursuing a person who they have reason to believe has just committed a serious crime, may enter a vehicle or building believed to be entered by the suspect and search the building or vehicle for the person or any weapons that might be used to further his escape.

(6) Plain View

During the course of otherwise lawful activity, military forces may seize any unlawful weapons or objects related to criminal activity which they observe in plain view. When conducting warrantless searches that require a probable cause determination, military forces can obtain advice from a judge advocate; however, the probable cause determination must be made personally by the individual desiring to conduct the search.

If a search warrant is required, local civil authorities should obtain judicially issued search warrants. If local civilian authorities are not available, judge advocates need to be prepared to provide advice on probable cause to military authorities before they approach a local judge or magistrate for a search warrant.

When feasible, all searches conducted by military personnel will be conducted by two personnel with the actual search performed by someone of the same sex.76 A hand receipt or some similar document should be prepared when items of personal property are seized from an individual.

c. Confinement Facilities

The Joint Civil Disturbance Task Force should not operate a detention facility. Any person apprehended should be turned over to the police for detention. Military correctional facilities cannot be used to detain civilians. If available civilian detention facilities cannot accommodate the number of detained persons who are awaiting arraignment, the Joint Civil Disturbance Task Force commander must seek the approval of the SCRAG and Combatant Commander to set up a temporary detention facility.

Should the Task Force be required to operate a detention facility, the detention facility standards and operations should conform, to the maximum extent possible, to current DoD confinement facility operations and will be under the professional supervision and control of Military Police personnel. The establishment and operation of military detention facilities is a temporary expedient and is authorized only until such time as the custody of detained persons can be transferred to civil authorities.

d. Riot Control Agents

Normally, for CDO the deployment and use of riot control agents is allowed as a matter of U.S. policy. However, initial approval authority for its deployment and use may be retained at a level higher than the Joint Civil Disturbance Task Force Commander and may require a specific request.

This is not the same as a state-level activation, but it is the doctrine that is crafted at the federal level these days so I think it's pretty relevant to Ferguson.

timthumb.png

The federal government hasn't taken kindly to people that expose these types of relationships. Barrett Brown's sentencing just got delayed again - but at least the Barrett Brown Review of Arts and Letters and Jail is awesome. For more info FreeBarrettBrown.org.

Information Operations & Solicitation for US Propaganda Disruption Ideas: Radio Free Asia

Radio Free Asia and its parent organization the Broadcasting Board of Governors are pretty shady entities. I can't resist cross posting this odd appeal for "Open Tech Fund" from RFA…

SOURCE Cryptome.org - Solicitation for US Propaganda Disruption Ideas

Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2013 12:20:37 +0100
From: Dan Meredith <meredithd[at]rfa.org>
Organization: Open Technology Fund
To: cryptography[at]randombit.net
Subject: [cryptography] Open Solicitation for Concept Notes: Open Technology
        Fund

Hello cryptographers,

We are excited to share that the Open Technology Fund (OTF) at Radio Free Asia's (RFA) ongoing solicitation of concept notes is open and receiving proposals. We seek to fund disruptive technology projects that advance global Internet freedom and human rights online. If you are interested in submitting a concept note for our consideration, the process begins by completing our short online form:

https://opentechfund.org/submit.

More information about our full proposal process can be found on our website:

https://opentechfund.org/submit/guide.

OTF utilizes public funds to support Internet freedom projects. We support projects that develop open and accessible technologies promoting human rights and open societies. We strive to advance inclusive and safe access to global communication networks.

Created in 2012, OTF is an RFA program supported by funds from the Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG). The BBG’s mission is to inform, engage, and connect people around the world in support of freedom and democracy. RFA’s mission is to provide accurate and timely information to the people of Asia who lack adequate protections for freedom of expression, free speech, and a free press.

In a globally interconnected society, creating and protecting freedom of expression, free speech, and a free press requires cross-border technology tools that enable the exercise of human rights within repressive societies for the global population. OTF strives to incubate and support projects creating these tools around the world. More information on our program can be found at

https://opentechfund.org/about.

If you have any questions, please send them our way by emailing otf[at]rfa.org.

We look forward to your submission.
--
Dan Meredith
pgp 0x36377134
_______________________________________________
cryptography mailing list
cryptography[at]randombit.net

http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography

/////

Here is some more material on the Radio Free Asia / Broadcasting Board of Governors apparatus via alternative journalist Wayne Madsen, who himself is under a bit of pressure from nasty bloggers for reporting on EU NSA surveillance and other unorthodox stories….

George Soros’s and the Neo-Cons’ Control of Washington’s Propaganda Program > Strategic-Culture.org - Strategic Culture Foundation - April 25 2012

An examination of the current 2013 budget for the U.S. government’s Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG) that oversees the International Broadcasting Board (IBB) and which determines the slant taken by the U.S. government’s propaganda efforts on radio, television, and, increasingly on the Internet, illustrates the head-lock that George Soros and neo-conservative “soft power projection” interests have on the official state-sponsored information disseminated by the U.S. government to a global audience.

The new propaganda bias of such IBB-controlled outlets such as the Voice of America, Radio Free Asia, and Radio Free Europe should comes as no surprise, considering that former CNN chairman and chief executive officer Walter Isaacson laid down the gauntlet after he assumed the chairmanship of the Broadcasting Board of Governors in 2009 by calling for the United States to aggressively challenge what he termed anti-American “propaganda” emanating from such international broadcasters as RT (the former Russia Today), Iran’s Press TV, and China’s CCTV. Isaacson walks in lock-step with the goals of Soros and the Council on Foreign Relations as the head of the politically-connected Aspen Institute. Isaacson stepped down from his broadcasting chairmanship position in January 2012.

The priorities for U.S. propaganda include stepping up efforts to effect political change in what are termed the five remaining “Communist” countries in the world through Cold War-era dissemination of “news” and other content via the Voice of America (VOA), the Office of Cuba Broadcasting (OCB) , and “grantee” organizations RFE/RL (Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty), Inc., and Radio Free Asia (RFA). Soros’s Open Society Institute holds a predominant role in the administration of the “grantee” broadcast arms, which were originally operated by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) before de facto control was passed to Soros after the collapse of communism in Europe. The targeted five remaining communist nations are China, Cuba, North Korea, Laos, and Vietnam.

The BBG claims that America’s propaganda efforts reach a global audience of 187 million people and that the 59 language broadcasts to over 100 nations costs less than a mere $5 million per year. The BBG budget request contains all the Soros code phrases in describing America’s “highest standards of journalistic independence, ethics, and objectivity” and support of “democracy, civil society, and transparent institutions around the world.”

Check in there for more infos. It's a nasty Soros pass thru fo sho! … Also check out LittleSis.org for more crowdsourced, cited info on these kinds of orgs and players..

For more on these projects see also: Projects | Open Technology Fund

Updates | Open Technology Fund

Home · globaleaks/GlobaLeaks Wiki · GitHub

BREAKING: NSA whistleblower Russ Tice says Obama spied on by NSA; Colin Powell's telecoms tracked by NSA satellite tech

///// UPDATE Friday 2pm Central: Tice got squelched by shady NBC lawyers at the last second according to BoilingFrogsPost.com:

Today MSNBC aired an interview with Mr. Tice disclosing “some” of his revelations, thanks to the vigilant activists who tirelessly shared and disseminated Mr. Tice’s revelations and interview audio. Interestingly, at the last minute, MSNBC told Mr. Tice that they would NOT include his revelations on NSA’s targeting of Obama, elected officials, attorneys, judges and activists. Basically, they censored his entire testimony on these stunning allegations!
In a correspondence with Boiling Frogs Post immediately following his censored interview with MSNBC Mr. Tice stated: “When they were placing the ear-phone in my ear with less than ten minutes left till my air time, the producer in New York said that their lawyers were discussing the material, and at this time, they did not want me to mention anything about the NSA wiretaps against all the people and organizations that I mentioned. That is how it went down. I did say on the air that I know it is much worse and would like to talk about that some time.”
- See more at: http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/2013/06/21/msnbc-censors-nsa-whistleblow...

The heat is on and the squirrels are getting squirrelly!!! /////

shit-just-got-real.jpg

Been waiting to hear more material from Russ Tice, one of the earlier NSA whistleblowers. Fortunately one of our ol' underdogs BoilingFrogsPost.com & Sibel Edmonds got Tice to lay out a lot of new stuff. Tice was a major source for NSA revelations including the 2005 NY Times warrantless wiretapping story.

Named NSA targets by Tice include current Supreme Court Justice Alito, Sen. Dianne Feinstein, Hillary Clinton, Rep. Henry Waxman, then-Sen. Evan Bayh, Sen. John McCain, Sen. Jay Rockefeller, then-US Rep. Kucinich. And of course President Obama.

Here is a quick clip: via very big on FiredogLake: BREAKING: NSA Whistleblower Russ Tice Alleges NSA Wiretapped Then-Sen. Candidate Barack Obama | MyFDL

In this bombshell episode of the Boiling Frogs Post Podcast Show NSA whistleblower Russ Tice joins us to go on record for the first time with new revelations and the names of official culprits involved in the NSA’s illegal practices. Mr. Tice explains in detail how the National Security Agency targets, sucks-in, stores and analyzes illegally obtained content from the masses in the United States. He contradicts officials and the mainstream media on the status of the NSA’s Utah facility, which is already operating and “On-Line.” He reveals the NSA as a Deep State that targets and wiretaps US political candidates for its own purposes. We discuss the latest controversies involving the NSA, PRISM, Edward Snowden, and the spins and lies that are being floated by the US mainstream and pseudo-alternative media. Do NOT miss this revelatory interview.

Listen to the preview Here - See more at: http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/2013/06/19/podcast-show-112-nsa-whistleb...

DOWNLOAD HERE > http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/podpress_trac/web/20927/0/BF.0112.Tice_2... - you may want to skip to about 50 minutes to catch the name dropping space spying going on.

bfp_podcast_version.gif"Here's the big one ... this was in summer of 2004, one of the papers that I held in my hand was to wiretap a bunch of numbers associated with a 40-something-year-old wannabe senator for Illinois," he said. "You wouldn't happen to know where that guy lives right now would you? It's a big white house in Washington, D.C. That's who they went after, and that's the president of the United States now."

There was a lot of specific references to space-based platforms - that is National Security Agency satellite technology - which was Tice's specialty to which he has now apparently turned The Blowtorch with excellent timing.

The story is getting out now. Bush-era whistleblower: Obama was NSA wiretap victim in 2004 | The Daily Caller. Huffpo did a quick post: Russ Tice, Bush-Era Whistleblower, Claims NSA Ordered Wiretap Of Barack Obama In 2004. Duly flagged on Cryptogon: Russ Tice on Boiling Frogs Podcast

Iran's press service flagged it: PressTV - NSA spied on Obama: Whistleblower

At the Guardian: Procedures used by NSA to target non-US persons: Exhibit A – full document | World news | guardian.co.uk && Revealed: the top secret rules that allow NSA to use US data without a warrant | World news | guardian.co.uk

Vast discretion vested in NSA analysts -- Glenn Greenwald http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/jun/19/fisa-court-oversight-process-secrecy

The vast amount of discretion vested in NSA analysts is also demonstrated by the training and briefings given to them by the agency. In one such briefing from an official with the NSA’s general counsel’s office – a top secret transcript of which was obtained by the Guardian, dated 2008 and then updated for 2013 – NSA analysts are told how much the new Fisa law diluted the prior standards and how much discretion they now have in deciding whose communications to intercept:

“The court gets to look at procedures for saying that there is a reasonable belief for saying that a target is outside of the United States. Once again – a major change from the targeting under Fisa. Under Fisa you had to have probable cause to believe that the target was a foreign power or agent of a foreign power. Here all you need is a reasonable belief that the target is outside of the United States …

“Now, all kinds of information can be used to this end. There’s a list in the targeting procedures: phone directories, finished foreign intelligence, NSA technical analysis of selectors, lead information. Now, you don’t have to check a box in every one of those categories. But you have to look at everything you’ve got and make a judgment. Looking at everything, do you have a reasonable belief that your target is outside the United States? So, cast your search wide. But don’t feel as though you have to have something in every category. In the end, what matters is, ‘Does all that add up to a reasonable belief that your target is outside the United States?’”

So vast is this discretion that NSA analysts even have the authority to surveil communications between their targets and their lawyers, and that information can be not just stored but also disseminated. NSA procedures do not ban such interception, but rather set forth procedures to be followed in the event that the NSA analyst believes they should be “disseminated”.

The decisions about who has their emails and telephone calls intercepted by the NSA is made by the NSA itself, not by the Fisa court, except where the NSA itself concludes the person is a US citizen and/or the communication is exclusively domestic. But even in such cases, the NSA often ends up intercepting those communications of Americans without individualized warrants, and all of this is left to the discretion of the NSA analysts with no real judicial oversight.

Also: FBI Admits That Obeying The Constitution Just Takes Too Much Time | Techdirt

And: Skype Provided Backdoor Access to the NSA Before Microsoft Takeover [NYT]

Plus: Straight Outta Government: GSA Mulls Deal With Rap Genius - Nextgov.com (wat?)

And: Obama’s crackdown views leaks as aiding enemies of U.S. | McClatchy

Wowww… busy days people. It's amazing to see a suppressed narrative like the NSA domestic spying apparatus suddenly catch such traction in so many quarters!

The other heinous thing - well one other thing - is the secret TPP treaty. I'm glad reelected Rep. Alan Grayson is going to kick at it. First Congressman Allowed to Read Secret Treaty Says “This ... Hands The Sovereignty of Our Country Over to Corporate Interests” | Zero Hedge

The TPP is nicknamed “NAFTA on steroids.” Now that I’ve read it, I can see why. I can’t tell you what’s in the agreement, because the U.S. Trade Representative calls it classified. But I can tell you two things about it.

1) There is no national security purpose in keeping this text secret.

2) This agreement hands the sovereignty of our country over to corporate interests.

3) What they can’t afford to tell the American public is that [the rest of this sentence is classified].

……..

It is ironic in a way that the government thinks it's alright to have a record of every single call that an American makes, but not alright for an American citizen to know what sovereign powers the government is negotiating away.

***

Having seen what I’ve seen, I would characterize this as a gross abrogation of American sovereignty. And I would further characterize it as a punch in the face to the middle class of America. I think that’s fair to say from what I’ve seen so far. But I’m not allowed to tell you why!

Also: Warren on Trans-Pacific Partnership: If people knew what was going on, they would stop it | The Raw Story

Alright leaving this here for now. Get tuned in and look around - the truth is out there! SAIC, Booz Allen Hamilton, the grip of your sorts on all our lives is in for its createst challenge yet. The infosec praetorians are overdue for a fall in their space-age egos!

Kurt Johnson & Corporate NAFTA farm politics, Pork Producers Council 1990s spy ops: HogSpy DFL Primary MN-19A Special Election?

"[T]he activists we are concerned about here are the ones who want to change the way your industry does business--either for good or bad reasons: environmentalists, churches, Public Interest Research Groups, campus organizations, civic groups, teachers unions, and 'Naderites'." (quoted in Montague 1993) -- Ronald Duchin, from the PR firm Mongoven, Biscoe and Duchin, categorises activists as either radicals, opportunists, idealists or realists.... Duchin's formula is therefore to isolate the radicals, turn the idealists into realists, co-opt the realists to support industry solutions and the opportunists will go along with the final agreement. The radicals, he says, need the support of the idealists and realists to have credibility. Without them they are marginalised and "seen to be shallow and self-serving." (Montague 1993) Greenwash - Categorising Environmentalists

Interesting tidbit surfaces! A filed Democratic-Farmer-Labor candidate for Minnesota House District 19A, Kurt Johnson, has just been passed over for endorsement today by DFL, though he came in second in four rounds of balloting. Confusingly, someone named Clark Johnson won DFL endorsement on the fourth ballot in North Mankato today, as reported at Clark Johnson wins DFL endorsement for House 19A » The Free Press, Mankato, MN. The primary is Jan. 29th and the general election is Feb. 12th.

Due to the compressed schedule, all the candidates will appear on the primary ballot. For the general election, eccentric lolcat & famed undercover investigator of pornography Allen Quist will be repping for the Republican Party, fresh off an unsuccessful, but name ID-boosting, congressional campaign vs Tim Walz.

Anyway Kurt Johnson was the president of the primary corporate hog farmer lobby, the National Pork Producers Council, in part of the 1990s. The following bio says 1994 only, though another says 1993. In 1997, NPPC was exposed for hiring corporate spying specialists, Mongoven, Biscoe & Duchin Inc., in 1996. Therefore we could say there is a pretty close overlap between corporate spying and Johnson's tenure, though very little information surfaces online about this. NPPC is also considered by PRWatch as a pro-factory farming ALEC supporter.

Summary point: Not being familiar with the pork industry or MBC's spying, this is not a blockbuster post with sekrit sources but there seem to be interesting patterns. One finds very little documented connection between Johnson & MBC, however it seems reasonable to say there appears 2nd or 3rd degree links connecting Johnson & the MBC operation through NPPC and the pro-checkoff campaign he was co-chairing around 2000.

Johnson has been a player within and a supporter of global trade agreement deals, putting him firmly in the 'globalist' camp if you prefer that label. See this: 1997: Connect Business Magazine » Cover Story » Karl Johnson

Besides co-owning Equity Supply, North Mankato’s Karl Johnson also raises hogs – and lots of them: this year 20,000 and next year about 35,000. Hogs are the means through which he’s earned a national reputation. He’s also worked on the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and GATT, testified before Congress, been interviewed by most major news organizations, and currently he sits on a special task force for Secretary of Agriculture Dan Glickman. And all because of hogs.

You could say he “brings home the bacon” for the region’s hog producers.

Karl Johnson is in full command of his facts and can communicate those facts well. He leans back in his chair and makes you feel good about hogs. For once he has the chance to tell you pork’s story from pork’s perspective. And he seems to enjoy that.

CONNECT: When you were president of the National Pork Producers Council, how do you feel you were treated by the media, by politicians and by special interest groups?

Johnson: It’s a mixed reaction, quite frankly, but by-and-large rather well. I wouldn’t say that we had tremendous problems. Obviously I’ve testified before Congress several times and was usually well-received. I worked very hard on the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the GATT agreement. In Washington I was by-and-large rather well-received. We would go in with Congressmen who were concerned about what was happening in their area and we talked about the pork industry – I’ve had that (experience). We go through some negatives, there’s no question about that. There’s some tough interviews.

I was interviewed by the ABC news program probably three years ago now; talking about the swine industry and how it relates to the world. Anyway, I remember we did an hour and a-half interview like this, with TV, so they’re doing the whole thing, and I was in a chair and an office for an hour and a-half. I was put through the wringer, if you will. And I thought I must have done fairly well because they only used ten seconds of it. (laughter) So sometimes you’re beat up a little bit. Mostly we’ve found that, or I’ve found, that interviewers from the Washington Post to the L.A. Times, to the Wall Street Journal, once they’ve started visiting with you and found out some of the facts – at first they were on a mission – but when they found out the facts they would back off. We were treated, I think, fairly decently.

I think, now in the last couple of years, some things have come about where that is not quite as true. I think that we are being viewed as corporate agriculture, which scares everyone. We’re not. I mean, there’s still an awful lot of independent producers that are forming alliances. But it’s being perceived differently. We’ve got some groups within agriculture, there are some offshoot groups, that are fighting this consolidation, if you will, of agriculture. They’re getting some tough times. Sometimes, I think, as well, that in the press it’s not a story unless it’s a negative story. Sometimes that happens. A good friend of mine is a reporter with the Minneapolis Tribune and I know that he has that same opinion – he will agree with me on that. It doesn’t sell papers if you don’t make it a bit interesting.

Occupation: Co-owner of Equity Supply in Mankato. Pork producer, rural North Mankato (currently produces 20,000 market hogs).

Born: December 24, 1945.

Education: Mankato High School Class of ’63. Attended Mankato State University.

National Experience: Past President, National Pork Producers Council (1994). Current Chairman, National Pork Producers Council Foreign Trade Committee. Officer, U.S. Meat Export Federation. Member, Special Task Force, for U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Dan Glickman, on concentration of U.S. packing industry.

Regional and Local Experience: Past President, MN Pork Producers Association (’84-’85). Former Chairman, Mankato Chamber of Commerce Agriculture Committee. Former Member, South Central Technical College Foundation. Chairman of the Board, Frost-BENCO-Wells Electric. Community Board Member, Norwest Bank, Mankato.

Mongroven, Biscoe & Duchin Inc. were hired to spy on opponents of the NPPC partly using revenue from something I'd never heard of before, the "Pork Checkoff", a researcher discovered. See About Pork Checkoff and the National Pork Board. "U.S. pork producers and importers pay $0.40 per $100 of value when pigs are sold and when pigs or pork products are brought into the United States." I'm kind of confused about the status of the checkoff today (large sums collected in Minnesota in 2012), but it seems pretty clear that checkoff money was used to spy on NPPC opponents during an era where Johnson played a key role in defending the checkoff for NPPC. [Nov 2012 MN pork Checkoff report, March 2012 National Pork Checkoff Nominating Committee ]

MBD has a storied history of working as henchmen & specialists on spying on activists for the tobacco industry, the chlorine industry, and they started with Nestlé in 1981 when people fought their nasty baby formula marketing in the developing world. They don't even seem to have a website. Be sure to see Mongoven, Biscoe & Duchin: destroying tobacco control activism from the inside -- Carter 11 (2): 112 -- Tobacco Control including "monitoring and co-opting NGOs" and "character assassination research":

A particularly nasty specialty of MBD is preparing backgrounders on individuals who lead tobacco control efforts, presumably to enable the industry to discredit them in the eyes of the public or decision makers. PM specifically requested that MBD investigate Dr Sydney Wolfe of the Health Research Group (HRG), Cliff Douglas of the American Lung Association, and Scott Ballin of the American Heart Association in 1992. MBD sent information they already had on file and advised “If we had a day or so we could expand on this information significantly.”31 As well as general career path and network information, Mongoven's somewhat desperate attempts to identify a character flaw involve an association with prominent consumer advocate Ralph Nader and a very tenuous suggestion that this may have influenced the awarding of a grant.31 Far more vicious is MBD's work on Dr Gro Harlem Brundtland in relation to her appointment as Director General of the WHO. Brundtland moved tobacco control to the top of the WHO priority list on her appointment, thus posed a significant threat to the industry. In 1998 Mongoven provided intelligence both on the appointment process and Brundtland's loyalties, predicting that she was certain to be elected to the position.32

We are really talking about the dirty black-bag job types, the undertakers of the technocratic 'expertise' driven world dominated by professional Public Relations - as covered by PRWatch writers Rampton & Stauber in Trust Us, We're Experts | PR Watch.

They are still listed here at 1100 Connecticut Ave NW #300 Washington DC 20036, at phone 202-429-1800. (lol same spot as the Anti-Defamation League according to the map!)

via Through tobacco industry eyes: civil society and the FCTC process from Philip Morris and British American Tobacco’s perspectives | Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education  - a little hard to read but interesting - http://tobacco.ucsf.edu/sites/default/files/tc.2010.041657.full_.pdf

mbd-notes.png

Here's the Big Kit & Kaboodle: The Land Stewardship Project reported the spying involving the NPPC and the Pork Checkoff in 1997: Pork Checkoff 'Spy' Funds Questioned - 1/17/1997 (also posted almost same version at Pork Producers Council uses checkoff to investigate farm groups by Brian DeVore - Rural America / In Motion Magazine)

Pork Checkoff 'Spy' Funds Questioned

NPPC paid PR firm to keep tabs on unknowing sustainable ag and family farm groups, according to Council documents leaked to the media.

1/17/97: The National Pork Producers Council (NPPC) has paid $50,000 to investigate the activities of six family farm and sustainable agriculture groups, according to NPPC documents leaked to the media last week. Part of that money, which was paid to a Washington, D.C., public relations firm, came from the federal pork checkoff, says Alan Guebert, an Illinois-based journalist who wrote about the NPPC's surveillance work in this week's edition of his syndicated column.

The PR firm, Mongoven, Biscoe and Duchin, Inc., was hired by the NPPC in 1996, and its investigation of grassroots groups continues as part of a $100,000, checkoff-sponsored program called Strategic Communication Initiatives, according to NPPC officials.

"The NPPC is run by the big producers and corporate factory farms for their own benefit, and they use our money to do it," said Rodney Skalbeck, a Renville County, Minn., hog farmer and a member of the Land Stewardship Project. "Now they're trying to defuse some of the organizations that represent the average family farmer and rural citizens. It's got to stop. Let's end the mandatory checkoff."

The checkoff is a mandatory system for collecting money from every hog farmer in the country for promotion, research and education purposes. In 1996, the NPPC received approximately $45 million in pork checkoff funds from tens of thousands of producers. Approximately $24 million of that total came from the largest 40 producers in the country, who own more than 1.7 million sows collectively.

Three of the groups being watched by the firm without their knowledge -- Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement, the Missouri Rural Crisis Center and the Minnesota-based Land Stewardship Project -- are members of the Campaign for Family Farms and the Environment (CFFE). The Campaign has confronted NPPC officials on several occasions for promoting industrialized hog factories at the expense of independent family farmers. CFFE groups have also questioned the truthfulness of information provided to state and federal legislators by NPPC and its state affiliates.

In response to the news of NPPC using producers' money for surveillance, the Campaign for Family Farms and the Environment has called for a congressional investigation into the use of NPPC checkoff funds, an end to the mandatory checkoff, and the resignation of NPPC president Bob Ruggles.

"I should be shocked by NPPC's paranoid tactics but I'm not," said Iowa CCI member and Marshall County, Iowa, hog producer Larry Ginter. "Why should my money go to support spying on farm organizations that are trying to help me and other independent family hog producers? It's time to end the mandatory pork checkoff."

Ron Perry, a Livingston County, Mo., hog farmer and a member of the Missouri Rural Crisis Center was also outraged: "It's obvious the NPPC has lost touch with the concerns of average hog farmers. They see us as a threat because we've successfully exposed their corporate agenda. We're having a big impact."

Mongoven, Biscoe and Duchin is regarded as the number one "spies for hire" public relations firm in the country, according to John Stauber, editor of PR Watch, a publication that covers the public relations industry. John Mongoven, president of the firm, was a public relations consultant for Nestle Foods when the company was attempting to counter an international church-led boycott protesting the food company's deadly practice of selling infant formula to women in third world countries.

The Campaign for Family Farms and the Environment is a coalition of eight groups in six states that are fighting against hog factories and concentration in the livestock industry. Other members of the coalition include Illinois Stewardship Alliance, Citizens of Lincoln Township, North Carolina Land Loss Prevention Project, Animal Welfare Institute and the Oklahoma Toxics Campaign.

Release from Brian DeVore, communications coordinator, The Land Stewardship Project.

While he has been involved with this pork checkoff thing, he may have only been president in 1993 if this profile is accurate: Minnesotan Inducted Into Hall of Fame | National Hog Farmer:

North Mankato, MN, pork producer Karl Johnson has been inducted into the National Pork Producers Council (NPPC) Hall of Fame for his outstanding contributions to the pork industry.

Johnson, a 40-year veteran of the pork industry, runs a farrow-to-finish operation with his brother, Paul.

Johnson served as president of NPPC in 1993, during which he represented producer interests on various trade issues including the North American Free Trade Agreement and the Uruguay Round of the General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs. [GATT]

Karl Johnson also served as president of the Minnesota Pork Producers Association, chairman of the U.S. Meat Export Federation and was on the Secretary of Agriculture’s Technical Advisory Committee, which addressed trade issues.

Perhaps more interesting is Johnson's staunch advocacy in farm world for NAFTA and GATT, and his particular role writing these trade deal which benefitted big agri-biz corporations at the expense of the family farm both domestically and internationally.

See quote in AP story in Kentucky New Era: Farmers' split on NAFA leaves lawmakers confused - Oct 25 1993.

In 1991 Johnson was named as Vice President of NPPC according to Nevada Daily Mail March 19 1991. The Nevada Daily Mail - Google News Archive.

According to New Ulm Journal there were ad buys planned by Karl, unclear if will happen now.

Karl Johnson

Karl Johnson, a hog farmer and former president of several pork producer organizations on the state and national level, feels his strength in the endorsement and in a 19A race against Quist is his ability to reach rural voters. He said he has strong name recognition in the district, making him able to peel away voters from Quist's demographics, as well as being able to run without needing to spend money on introducing himself to voters.

All the DFL candidates previously said they would abide by the endorsement, and party leadership indicated they expected unity in the process.

However, Karl Johnson declined to comment Thursday when asked if he would abide by the endorsement. He acknowledge purchasing ads for his candidacy that started Thursday and will air through the weekend in the Mankato area. He also has ads planned for the middle of next week in a wider area, including KNUJ in New Ulm.

It In the late 1990s, the National Pork Producers Council was discovered to have employed notorious low-profile corporate spying specialists via the 'pork checkoff' money. By 2000, a fully confusing situation had resulted:

NPPC Accuses Anti-Checkoff Forces of Misleading Actions - source http://www.agriculturelaw.com/headlines/aug00/aug24c.htm

August 24, 2000

The National Pork Producers Council says opponents of the pork research and promotion program, also known as the checkoff program used "blatant efforts to mislead ... and misrepresent information" about two checkoff programs. The information was in a Wednesday news release distributed by the Campaign for Family Farms along with the Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement, Missouri Rural Crisis Center and the Land Stewardship Project, NPPC said.

"As pork producers, we should not tolerate the blatant efforts to mislead producers and misrepresent information about the pork checkoff, being told by anti-checkoff activists," said Karl Johnson, Mankato, Minnesota pork producer and co-chair of the Vote Yes Task Force. "It is time to set the record straight."

Johnson said, "The anti-checkoff activists are targeting a study being conducted by Louisiana State University (LSU). The study was designed to assess producer needs. Results will be used to help determine direction of producer education programs to assure producers have access to the types of programs and information they need-- like modern record keeping, production practices, educational seminars and risk management."

Jeffery Gillespie, LSU agriculture economics associate professor, who was quoted in the news release, said they misrepresented the facts, according to NPPC. In reality, NPPC added, Gillespie said, "This is an economic research study designed to look at a cross-section of pork producers. LSU developed this study with the intent of identifying producer needs. NPPC had no input or changes into the construction of the survey. Checkoff funding was provided to support the printing and mailing costs."

The results of the LSU study will not be complete or available until August 2001, therefore having no impact on the outcome of this referendum, NPPC noted.

"Unfortunately, the anti-checkoff activists did not stop there in their misinformation," said Johnson. "They also alleged the National Pork Producers Council was using checkoff funds in Colorado. In reality, the Colorado Pork Producers Council used state checkoff funds to air consumer radio commercials in Colorado, the content of which USDA had approved," according to Johnson.

By law, pork checkoff dollars can not be used to persuade a producer to vote for or against the checkoff. They can only be used to encourage producers to vote.

Donna Reifschneider, co-chair of the Vote Yes Task Force said pork producers should be "wary of the plethora of misinformation and half-truths being touted by anti-checkoff activists." She added, "This is only the latest in a string of attacks against the checkoff and the producer programs it funds. We are not going to stand still and let the anti-checkoff activists attack the highly successful pork checkoff any longer. It is time they get their facts straight. We stand by the truth, it must also be required of the Campaign for Family Farms and the Environment, the Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement, Missouri Rural Crisis Center and the Land Stewardship Project."

In their news release, the activist groups said two examples of NPPC "misuse of checkoff funds to influence the vote" had been found by "hog farmer members of the Campaign for Family Farms." They said NPPC's "repeated misuse of checkoff funds to influence the checkoff vote demonstrates the lack of accountability of the checkoff" and called on USDA’s Agricultural Marketing Service of USDA to suspend checkoff spending until the final results of the referendum are posted.

"Hog farmers," the groups claimed, "found out the Colorado Pork Producers Association is proposing to use $12,000 in checkoff funds to air 30 second radio ads promoting the checkoff and emphasizing the benefits of the checkoff program. The commercials will run in the major pork producing areas of Colorado during the absentee voting period (August and September)."

That, they added, is "unconscionable (in) that at the same time producers' share of the retail dollar has dropped from 46 cents to less than 30 cents, NPPC attempts to spend checkoff dollars to influence the upcoming checkoff vote." Rhonda Perry, Missouri hog farmer and Missouri Rural Crisis Center member, said, "They can't play by the rules because they'll lose, they know that independent hog farmers will vote to end their mandatory, multi_million dollar tax."

They also claimed NPPC has used checkoff dollars to fund a recent study by Louisiana State University (LSU) that was supposedly intended to find out which type of producer (independent, contract or corporate) will likely be left in hog production in the future.

"The head of research for the study, LSU Associate Professor Jefferey M. Gillespie, confirmed that checkoff dollars were being used," the news release said. "According to Gillespie, the study contains two questions about how producers are planning to vote in the pork checkoff referendum. Gillespie said the NPPC will use this information to help them identify different types of producers that will vote to continue the mandatory pork checkoff."

NPPC is violating federal rules by using checkoff dollars to influence the vote, the groups said. "The USDA clearly explained to the NPPC that they could not use checkoff dollars to sway the vote, yet that's exactly what they're doing," said Wayne Demmer, a Dubuque county independent hog producer and Iowa CCI member. "They will attempt to use the radio ads to promote the benefits of the checkoff and the information from the LSU study to develop referendum strategies to try to figure out how to win votes."

////////

Here is kind of a key article from the High Plains / Midwest AG Journal in 2000:

Co-chair of the Vote Yes Task Force, Karl Johnson, said, "The pork checkoff has been a phenomenal success at what it was designed to do, build demand and address issues that individual producers couldn't do on their own. The pork checkoff is producer-driven and has evolved to meet the needs of pork producers."

According to Johnson, a Mankato, MN, pork producer, "The checkoff-funded Pork. The Other White Meat advertising campaign, originally undertaken to reposition pork to U. S. consumers, has done so. Today, the campaign has increased U.S. pork demand, reversing a dramatic decline from 1979 to 1985."

Johnson continued that U.S. pork is making its mark worldwide. Through checkoff-funded foreign market development, the U. S. now is a net exporter of pork, instead of a net importer. In 1990, the U.S. exported only 244 million pounds of pork. In 2000, the U.S. will export about 1.275 billion pounds of pork.

Johnson also cited a 17% increase in pork's usage at restaurants, as a direct result of checkoff-funded efforts. He said that increase is important, because 54% of all U.S. pork is eaten by people away from home.

& similar: NPPC Counters Anti-Checkoff Claims | from National Hog Farmer.

Chicago Tribune November 29 1993: Nafta Likely To Boost Export Opportunities For U.s. Pork Producers - Chicago Tribune

Buoyed by congressional passage of the North American Free Trade Agreement, pork industry leaders are predicting rising export opportunities into Mexico, already our country's second-largest market.

"Congress has sent a strong signal to America's pork producers . . . that our trade policy is going to back U.S. pork producers' efforts to compete in the global marketplace," said Karl Johnson, a pork producer from Mankato, Minn., and president of the Des Moines-based National Pork Producers Council.

"Approval of NAFTA is a landmark decision that will greatly enhance our opportunity to export pork and pork products as well as live hogs to Mexico," Johnson asserted. "It also shows that the United States is not going to concede important markets to our subsidized competitors, such as the European Community. This is especially critical during these final days of the negotiations on the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade."

Johnson said U.S. pork producers are in a position to provide the 400,000 metric tons of additional pork demand that Mexico probably will need by the year 2000. He pointed out that 1992 U.S. pork exports to 62 countries totaled far less: 140,180 metric tons.

At present, Mexico cannot export fresh, chilled or frozen pork or live hogs to the U.S. because of hog cholera in Mexico. The prohibition continues under NAFTA. Meanwhile, the trade accord requires Mexico to eliminate over the next 10 years its tariffs of 20 percent of the value of U.S. pork and live hog shipments.

Comments from the pork producers came as leaders of farm and commodity groups for the most part hailed the passage of the controversial trade agreement between the U.S., Mexico, and Canada as good for American agriculture, especially Midwest agriculture. The agreement phases out tariffs and other trade barriers. [...........]

/////////

AP July 26 1993: Farm Groups Lobby Congress For Trade Agreement: ''If we don't open trade with Mexico, someone else will,'' said Karl Johnson, president of the National Pork Producers Council.

March 2001: AgriMarketing.com - Pork Checkoff Vote Raises Questions and Concerns: "Pork Producer "Vote Yes" Task Force Co-chair Karl Johnson, a producer from Mankato, Minn., adds that discontinuation of the pork checkoff would be detrimental to the work the checkoff already has accomplished. "The progress made with the image, acceptance and demand for pork will slip away, the pork industry could experience accelerated consolidation, and coordinated efforts of research, education and information will be lost," Johnson says. "

/////////

From 1996: MBD: Mission Despicable | PR Watch

by John Stauber and Sheldon Rampton

Have you ever wondered what it's like to talk to a spy? The experience is quite a bit less dramatic than the scenarios you see in Mission Impossible, according to activists who have recently been targeted by phone calls and other information-gathering efforts.

The field operatives who gather information for Mongoven, Biscoe & Duchin are typically polite, low-key and do their best to sound sympathetic to the people they are interrogating. They have misrepresented themselves, claiming falsely to be journalists, friends of friends, or supporters of social change. Most of the time, however, they simply give very limited information, identifying their company only by its initials and describing MBD euphemistically as a "research group" which helps "corporate decision makers . . . develop a better appreciation of the public interest movement" in order to "resolve contentious public policy issues in a balanced and socially responsible manner."

MBD performs its services by pumping members of activist groups for information about their philosophical beliefs, funding sources, organizational structure and affiliations, and names of key personnel. Information only gets shared in one direction, however. "Our relations with our clients are confidential," stated MBD President Jack Mongoven in a June 7, 1995 memo refusing PR Watch's request for a list of MBD's corporate clients.

MBD says it is "grateful" when activists "cooperate" by answering its information requests, but don't expect the company to show its gratitude in any meaningful way, such as sending you a copy of the reports it writes about you. Those reports will be stamped confidential and delivered only to MBD's clients, who pay as much as $9,000 per month for the privilege of seeing them. Otherwise, MBD's "research" only sees the light of day on the rare occasions when a conscience-stricken corporate employee decides to turn whistleblower.

Raw material: Letter and Survey from MBD to the Wilderness Society | PR Watch

Mongoven, Biscoe & Duchin - SourceWatch

Sourcewatch also identifies NPPC as an ALEC supporter: National Pork Producers Council - SourceWatch

Here is a full report on NPPC using pork checkoff funds for the MBD spying: Summary of AMS Audit of NPPC - Prepared by Hugh Espy / Rural America - In Motion Magazine

Summary of AMS Audit of NPPC


Prepared by Hugh Espy,
Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement
Des Moines, Iowa

Compliance staff from the Unites States Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Agricultural Marketting Service (AMS) conducted a limited review of a complaint that the National Pork Producers Council (NPPC) had used checkoff funds collected by the National Pork Board to pay Mongoven, Biscoe and Duchin (MBD), Washingson D.C. public relaltions firm, for information on the activities of certain activist (family farms) groups and individuals.

The reviewers were able to determine that NPPC used non-checkoff funds to pay for the report in question, but that the NPPC did not pay for thc report until after the media and the USDA began questioning the funding subject matter of the report.

The review also disclosed that the NPPC had an existing agreement with MBD to routinely monitor groups and individuals, A total of $51,300 was paid by checkoff funds for these services.

The AMS review focused on four main questions:

  1. Did NPPC use checkoff funds to pay for thc MBD report entitled "Overview of Farm Groups"?
  2. Was the material produced by MBD consistent with the project description (provided by NPPC to the USDA) that USDA had approved?
  3. Was the material produced by MBD under the "contract" allowed under the Pork Promotion, Research and Consumer Order?
  4. Was the "contract" between NPPC and MBD entered into properly?

Question #1:

Did NPPC use checkoff funds to pay for the $3.449 MBD report entitled "Overview of Farm Goups?

Conclusion from AMS compliance staff:

NPPC ultimately paid $3,449 for the MDB report from unrestricted funds (noncheckoff funds). However, the check to pay for this report was issued on February 6, 1996. alnost a week after the report began to generate interest from the media. In addition, the check was backdated about three weeks. Coincidentally, the check was issued shortly after the media and AMS questioned the principal people involved (Charles Harness, Mike Simpson, etc.).

Other findings related to Question #1

In early December l996, Charles Harness at NPPC asked Ron Duchin at MBD to prepare a report on .several organizations that had taken positions critical of the large-scale hog operations and chages in the pork industry. The request was; made by telephone and there was no evidence that it was ever confirmed in a written contract or letter.

MBD prepared a report entitled "Overview of Various Organizations Concerned with Rur~al/Hog Industry Issues." The report contained "ovenviews of organizations concerned with rural issues that we (Mongoven) have determined will be the leaders of continuing anti-hog, anti-corporate livestock production in the coming year." The organizations named in the report were: Iowa Citizens for Community Inprovement, the Missouri Rural Crisis Center, the Land Stewardship Project, the Center for rural Affairs, the National Farmers Union, and the Corporate Agribusiness Research Project. the report was sent to about 30 state pork producer groups.

NPPC officials claim that they received MDB's invoice for the report shortly after they received the report on December 17, 1996. They also claim that the invoice was not paid within several weeks (as was NPPC's usual practise) because it was "misplaced" on a "manager's desk" for more than 45 days. Harness claimed he backdated the check for accounting purposes, but NPPC's Chief Financial Officer (Jim Stavneak) said the backdating was irrelevant from an accounting standpoint.

Duchin claimed the MDB invoiced NPPC on December 16 following the completion of its report. But MBD's invoice for the report is out of sequence with other MBD invoices. Four other invoices sent by MBD to NPPC are sequentially ordered in chronological order. Only the MBD invoice for the $3,449 report is out of order.

Member groups of the Campaign for Family Farms and the Environment (which inludes Iowa CCI, LSP and MRCC) think that NPPC was planning to use checkoff funds to pay for the $3,449 rport. NPPC was forced to use non-checkoff funds when the report became public.

Question #2:

Was the material produced by MBD consistent with the project description (provided by NPPC to the USDA) that USDA had approved?

Conclusion from AMS compliance staff:

No. The information provided by MBD to NPPC through the checkoff-funded agreement was not consistent with the objectives and methods of the project description (Strategic Communications Inititative) approved by the USDA. NPPC told USDA that the objective of its 1996 Strategic Communications Inititative was to encourage positive reporting by "targetting" certain writers in order to encourage positive reporting. NPPC led USDA to believe that it was going to launch a positive promotion campaign.

However many of the reports submitted by MBD provided information on organizations and people with critical views of the pork industry. NPPC's project describes "targetting" writers, but the reports rarely (if ever) identified writers. Instead they focused on the activities of organizations.

Question #3:

Was the material produced by MBD under the "contract" allowed under the Act and the Order?

Conclusion from AMS compliance staff:

No. The subject matter of MBD's report fell outside the generally-recognized limits on the use of checkoff funds. Areview of the subject matter contained in MBD's checkoff funded reports for November 1996 through January 1997 reveals that the reports were primarily concerned with groups opposed large-scale agricultural operations. These reports were separate from the $3,349 report completed in December 1996.

The AMS told National Pork Board executive director Mike simpson in a May 1990 letter that checkoff funds could not be used to monitor or discredit activist organizations. Despite this, NPPC used checkoff funds to pay MBD for monitoring groups or individuals that were largely critical of large scale hog operations, including groups that have members who are hog farmers.

Other findings related to Question #3

NPPC's relationship with MBD's began in 1995 when NPPC entered into an agreement with MBD to provide information on a particular ogranization. On or about May 1, 1996, Harness (NPPC) and Duchin (MBD) entered into an oral agreement whereby NPPC would pay MDB for gathering information, during a 3-month trial period, on individuals and groups that might be critical of pork industry practises and/or large scale hog operations. NPPC sent MBD a check for $14,4000 on May 17, 1996 for the 3-month contract. This money came from checkoff funds.

After the 3-month trial period, Harness requested that MDB continue to monitor and report as it had during the trial period. MDB agreed, and Duchin wrote Harness on July 12, 1996, confirming their oral agreement to continue MDB's monitoring and reporting services. The monthly fee was $4,100, which would be paid for with checkoff funds.Between mid-May 1996 and late January 1997, NPPC paid MDB a total of $51,300 from checkoff funds for monitoring activist groups and individuals.

MBD produced checkoff-funded reports for NPPC on the following organizations: Pew Charitable Trusts, National Wildlife Federation, Wilderness Society, National Audobon Society, Sierra Club, League of Conservation Voters, Natural Resources Defense Council, Environmental Defense Fund, World Wildlife Fund, Friends of the Earth, World Wide Fund for Nature Gulf and Caribbean Campaign, and activist senior citizen and student groups that may be active on local environmental issues.

The AMS findings directly contradict earlier statements made by Harness and AL Tank, NPPC's CEO. Both Harness and Tank had said that NPPC monitored issues, not organizations.

Question #4:

Was the "contract" between NPPC and MBD entered into properly?

Conclusion from AMS compliance staff:

Probably not. In December 1995, NPPC contracted with the National Pork Board to perform the Pork Board's administrative functions. Therefore, when NPPC enters into contracts using checkoff funds, NPPC is acting either as a de facto Board, or, at the very least, as the Board's agent. As such, NPPC and those it contracts with are required to comply with the same law and regulations as the Pork Board.

The unwritten agreement between NPPC and MBD was a contract. It contains the general terms for the service and products to be provided, and the consideration to be paid for them. On the other hand, it lacks specificity, and omits many of the normal business terms found in written contracts, including provisions for governing law, waivers, indemnity, termination, and the like.

The Order requires that every contract the Pork Board enters into must contain certain specific provisions. Because the contract in this case is oral, it cannot fulfill the Order's requirements. The NPPC-MBD agreement is also at aodds with the agreements between the Pork Board and NPPC. For example, Pork Board-NPPC agreement states that all contracts the NPPC enters into that are for more than $10,000 must contain certain provisions relating to affirmative action and civil rights. The Order requires that all Pork Board contracts specify that the contractor's records are to be made available to the Secretary (of Agriculture Glickman)'s representatives for inspection (MBD refused to give AMS compliance staff access to its billing and collection records). The NPPC-MBD agreement does not contain many of these required terms.

Published in In Motion Magazine April 12, 1999.

//////

Circa Nov 25, 2000: Pork Checkoff Vote Completed; Results Pending » Market to Market » Iowa Public Television

Karl Johnson and his brother, run a 1,300 sow farrow-to-finish operation near Mankato, Minnesota.

Rhonda Perry raises hogs too, but other than that, the two have little in common.

Johnson's hogs are raised in confinement buildings and about half of them are marketed through contracts with packers.

Karl Johnson: "pork production has changed like the world has changed. It's become more consolidated. how many hardware stores are there left? Not very many small hardware stores, not very many car dealers, implement dealers, that type of things. Farms are getting larger. and pork producers have gotten larger. i don't know that i'm necessarily in favor of that, but something that happens if you're going to stay economically viable, you have to get larger and that's kind of the name of the game in the world today. "

Perry's pasture farrowed hogs are raised outdoors near Armstrong, Missouri and marketed directly to consumers through a producer-owned co-op called patchwork family farms.

Rhonda Perry: "unfortunately these projects come about because we don't have fair and open markets and that's not a good thing. And the environment in which this project took place and others will take place you know is a very negative environment for farmers and rural communities. and its not good that we have to have these types of projects in order to survive but it is good that we have figured out how to do it and we've been creative and we've been able to provide a quality product to consumers."

In addition to philosophical differences in husbandry and marketing, Perry and Johnson are diametrically opposed on a referendum determining the future of the pork checkoff.

This past September, pork producers voted on whether to continue the mandatory program.

Currently, a farmer marketing 1,000 hogs annually, pays about $450.00 into the checkoff fund, which is administered by the national pork board.

Most of the money is earmarked for promotion and research conducted by the national pork producers council, or N.P.P.C.

Larry Ginter: "today is a great day for agriculture because hog farmers across the u.s. are taking a big step towards reclaiming our industry."

In April of 1999, a handful of rural activists, armed with piles of petitions, announced they had more than enough signatures to force a vote on whether the checkoff should be continued.

The campaign for family farms, a coalition of seven grassroots rural groups, gathered signatures for about a year to force the vote.

Larry Ginter: "i want my checkoff dollars back!"

It wasn't the first time the group aired their dissatisfaction with the checkoff or the national pork producers council.

In 1997, the campaign for family farms marched to N.P.P.C. headquarters, where they posted a sign reading "national factory farms council."

Johnson, a past president of the national pork producers council, says promotion is a key reason why producers should vote to continue the checkoff.

Karl Johnson: "I think people need to remember, go back before we had the mandatory check off, back to the mid '80's when we were losing demand quite rapidly, pork was not considered the meat at all to eat and after the check off came in place, we came up with "pork the other white meat" campaign. Through that efforts, we really changed the public's perception of pork. these things have just contributed to the survival, if you will, of us as independent pork producers."

There's little doubt "the other white meat" has been a successful promotional campaign for the pork industry.

a recent study conducted by northwestern university revealed the "other white meat" to be the fifth most recognizable slogan in contemporary advertising history.

Meanwhile, a Texas A study, commissioned by the national pork board, estimated producers reap a 5-to-1 net return ratio on their checkoff dollars.

Rhonda Perry: "what we're here today to say is that this gravy train to the NPPC is coming to a halt..."

Those opposed to the checkoff, cite different numbers. According to the campaign for family farms, pork producers have paid more than half-a-billion dollars into the fund since the program became mandatory in 1986.

During that time the campaign claims 250,000 pork producers, or 2 out of every 3, have gone out of business.

And the hog farmers share of the retail dollar plummeted from 46-cents at the checkoff?s inception to about 21-cents today.

Perry, who favors a voluntary checkoff, claims independent pork producers are paying into a system that yields little if any benefit.

Perry: "we're paying for that. We're paying for their lobbying activities and you know through corporate control of our markets and we?re just saying we're not going to pay anymore, we're not going to pay the checkoff anymore for commodity groups to say they represent us and we're not going to continue to pay into and participate in a system that doesn't work for us at our expense. and you know, by doing that, it actually changes the playing field a little bit."

The pork checkoff was turned down as noted in this press release Jan 11 2001 (I think that's the year)National Pork Producers Council Comments on USDA Announcement of Pork Checkoff... -- re> DES MOINES, Iowa, Jan. 11 /PRNewswire/ --

DES MOINES, Iowa, Jan. 11 /PRNewswire/ -- "We are deeply disappointed and very concerned by USDA's announcement regarding the pork checkoff referendum," said Craig Jarolimek, National Pork Producers Council president. "Instead of a sincere attempt to capture the will of the majority of legitimate pork producers about their checkoff, USDA let political motivation decide the fate of one the most successful commodity programs in American agriculture. USDA unequivocally understands the negative impact termination of the pork checkoff will have on every pork producer in this country," said Jarolimek, a Forest River, N.D., pork producer.

"Again and again producers are citing to us examples of flaws in the referendum voting process," said Karl Johnson, co-chair of the Vote Yes Task Force. "These situations include giving out the wrong voting materials; failing to posts lists of producers who had requested absentee ballots; and failing to post lists of producers who had voted in person, all of which resulted in the disqualification of the voter without their knowledge. Equally as disturbing, other producers were allowed to cast both absentee and in-person ballots or were allowed to cast ballots in violation of referendum rules.

"The checkoff was designed by pork producers, for pork producers, so that all pork producers would pay their fair share and reap the benefits from the checkoff-funded programs," said Johnson, a Mankato, Minn., pork producer. "The progress made with the image, acceptance and demand for pork will slip away, the pork industry could experience accelerated consolidation and coordinated efforts of research, education and information will be lost. In a time when even larger slaughter numbers are expected, as forecasted by USDA's own Quarterly Hogs and Pigs Report, programs providing those tools to producers become even more critical."

At the request of pork producers, the Pork Promotion Research and Consumer Information Act became law in 1985. The pork checkoff funded research, promotion and education programs designed to build a future and create opportunities for pork producers. In September, pork producers had the opportunity to vote on the future of the 14-year pork checkoff program. Approximately $54 million was collected through the pork checkoff in 2000. As required by the Pork Act and Order, 20% of money is returned to state pork associations for investment in state-directed promotion, consumer education and research programs.

SOURCE National Pork Producers Council

PR Newswire (http://s.tt/1yGSy)

A really confusing settlement is here: http://www.pork.org/filelibrary/Checkoff%20Settlement%20Seperation%20Agreement/MOA-govt4.pdf

//////

More cites for MBD: footnote 100 at The Cigarette Century: The Rise, Fall, and Deadly Persistence of the Product ... - Brandt - Google Books

Mongoven, Biscoe & Duchin/Women and Children First: On the Front Line of the Chlorine War - SourceWatch

Mongoven, Biscoe & Duchin/Behind Enemy Lines - SourceWatch

This partially available book about the struggle against corporate agriculture (including carbon markets as privatization of the atmosphere) seemed relevant - there was a Google hit but I can't find the quote: … and the echo follows. (2010)

//////

Anyway I thought this was an interesting bit of loose research on agricultural globalism, rural farm politics, professional corporate spies and of course the mysterious Politics of Bacon.

How to check cops checking your driver's license! Plus full texts of Anne Marie Rasmusson lawsuit settlements for cop ID checks

Yet another nasty branch on the poisonous tree of data abuse in Minnesota is bearing its digital fruit. Anne Marie Rasmusson, a former law enforcement officer, got 'checked out' by an absurdly sprawling array of Minnesota law enforcement officers illegally abusing their driver's license lookup systems. Three major legal documents from the settlements are included below, I believe for the first time on the web (I might be wrong but didn't spot anything on Google).

For the backstory of the weird law enforcement gangstalking of Rassmusson & subsequent litigation, see Nov 2 2012: Anne Marie Rasmusson's settlement haul now over $1 million - Aaron Rupar / CityPages.

From a clever data-fishing colleague, here is one proven method for promptly obtaining your own DVS data:

E-mail kim.jacobson@state.mn.us with "Hi Kim! This is a request to inspect public data under the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act using my own equipment, in electronic form. I would like to inspect all records and logs of when my driver's license and motor vehicle information on file with DVS was accessed, along with date, time, request detail and requesting agency. My driver's license number and license plates are: X. Thanks!"

100% Lulz virtually guaranteed. Not a horrible time lag either, from what I am hearing from people.

Better Know An Acronym: Mpls PD's ALPR & MnDOT's MBUF, the Parallel DataSchemes: Better get yr DVS records while they're hot: the government has a habit of clamping down on these kinds of data flows, legislative authorization be damned!

On another critical but separate mass surveillance & data control issue, IPAD | Information Policy Analysis Division, Minnesota Department of Administration is taking public comment until January 30, 2013 on the issue of the automated license plate reader system which Minneapolis has semi-extralegally shifted from public to non-public data classification. The PDF is here: www.ipad.state.mn.us/docs/mplsappalpr.pdf. One idea: let IPAD know that this tech is dangerous for data regardless of who is supposed to have access. As the burgeoning DVS omnishambles indicates, 'sensitive' data should be minimized in government, and even 'authorized' personnel actually shouldn't be trusted to operate these systems without granular and public systems of accountability.

Again it is worth pointing out that the City of Minneapolis itself argued in the PDF above that the data generated by the Minneapolis Police Department's Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) system is dangerous and must be made non-public for the same reasons that MnDOT's Mileage Based User Fee (MBUF, aka Intellidrive) data is dangerous.

MBUF is a story I have been following for several years - it would send extremely frequent location/direction/velocity info to the government & its military-industrial contractor, Battelle, for every user in order to generate a dollar figure for taxing the vehicle - only nuking all your remaining privacy in the process. After many months, much MnDOT MBUF data was released via a Mn Data Practices Act Request, though it is difficult to work with. See Nov 30 2012: EXCLUSIVE MnDOT info cake: 2.97gb emails/docs on the Mileage Based User Fee (MBUF)- Minnesota's GPS vehicle taxing regime in the works

Previously: Jan 9 2013: MPD Tracking OccupyMN Facebook BBQs: Minneapolis "secret" Strategic Information Center / Emergency Operations and Training Facility 25 37th Ave NE in Fridley // MPD Homeland Security Unit at Cruz House: Minneapolis Police Department data request on Occupy Minnesota finally released; sketchy anti-Occupy fusion-style police material from Nevada // Dec 14 2012: Mordor Mayor Rybak makes moves to hide Minneapolis panopticon: Total Minneapolis Awareness Automatic License Plate Reader records form 'retroactive surveillance' empire. Ye Gods we keep catching substantial fish!

The issue of abusive operations in the MN Department of Public Safety-controlled DVS database is becoming a major issue recently, with the decidedly unlikely duo of Republican-aligned Hennepin County Sheriff Rich Stanek and indefatigable Star Tribune reporter Randy Furst both finding highly indefensible query activity on their records. Minn. driver’s license data snoopers are difficult to track | StarTribune.com:

Despite widespread misuse of driver's license records in Minnesota, determining just who is peeking into your files can prove nearly impossible.

The Minnesota Department of Public Safety, which oversees the driver's license database, refuses to tell people the names of users -- generally public employees -- who have looked up their information. Perhaps the most high-profile citizen getting stonewalled by the state is Hennepin County Sheriff Rich Stanek, who is sparring with the department over what he believes were inappropriate queries into his driver's license records.

The Driver and Vehicle Services (DVS) database, which contains addresses, photographs and driving records on nearly every Minnesotan, is protected under state and federal law. State records show that public employees frequently have misused the database by running people's names without a business purpose. That is the subject of a major lawsuit that recently ensnared police officers across Minnesota, as well as a criminal case pending against two Minneapolis employees.

Stanek learned in June that employees at 21 agencies, including his own office, had accessed his records over several years. Some of the queries came from as far away as Wells, Minn., a small town 117 miles south of Minneapolis that he has never visited. The Department of Public Safety would not provide him with the names of the users.

"I believe that some or all of these requests may have been without a legitimate government purpose," Stanek wrote in a December letter to the Department of Administration, asking for an advisory opinion on the matter. The Department of Public Safety "and DVS appear to have purposely created obstacles to deny me an opportunity to track illegitimate access."

Stanek had made two previous requests for his lookups out of curiosity, and was surprised by how many agencies had queried his name.

This time, he says, a security concern prompted his request for the lookups.

He believes the state has an obligation to show that the lookups had a legitimate purpose, even if they do not hand over the names.

Anyhow, a source provided a great deal of the Rasmusson legal paperwork obtained via the Minnesota Data Practices Act. I don't think it's around elsewhere on the Internet, so here it is. I haven't looked over too many settlements myself, so this is overall just funny stuff about a serious topic -- nothing like a government formally conceding abuse and paying out hard-collected taxpayer cash to cover for some ridiculous abuse of officially "necessary" authority.

I wonder what kind of world we'd live in if our government units were actually run by people who never screw up like this, wasting all these resources and being generally abusive. There will surely be more inquiries along these lines...

Three parts:

Rassmusson Lawsuit 1 1110 001 (44pgs) - direct download 1.8MB: rassmusson_lawsuit-1-1110_001.pdf

Rassmusson Lawsuit 1 1110 001 by Dan Feidt

Rassmusson Lawsuit 2 1109 001 (5 pgs) - direct download 205KB: rassmusson_lawsuit-2-1109_001.pdf

Rassmusson Lawsuit 2 1109 001 by Dan Feidt

Rassmusson Lawsuit 3 1102 001 (39 pgs) - Direct download 1.9MB: rassmusson_lawsuit-3-1102_001.pdf

Rassmusson Lawsuit 3 1102 001 by Dan Feidt

Leaving it there for now, but hell, something will probably turn up yet again before I even have time to deal with it!!

EXCLUSIVE MnDOT info cake: 2.97gb emails/docs on the Mileage Based User Fee (MBUF)- Minnesota's GPS vehicle taxing regime in the works

After a long wait, on Nov 28 2012, the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) released ~2.97 gigabytes of data from inside the development of a GPS-based vehicle tracking system intended to introduce a vehicle tax - which would entail a great deal of data constantly collected by the government on the whereabouts and everyday patterns of the taxed vehicles. The source URL posted yesterday is ftp://ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outbound/chiefcounsel/Nate%20Hansen%20Email/ .

My friend Nathan Hansen made the request, pursuing a long-running story of the buildout of these taxation-tracking highway techs. (Disclosure: I did some design work for Hansen previously) The 2008 story I did: Now Searchable: The MnDOT NASCO NAFTA Superhighway Document Stash && Index of /June 2008 MN DOT Request/NASCO - Hansen Request && Index of /June 2008 MN DOT Request/June 2008 Request && Index of /DOT. A lot of these plans fell by the wayside - and a special Minnesota Intellidrive project and MBUF is the new plan. Related: Melissa Hill's new blog allows you to "Track the Police" using public data && Private company hoarding license-plate data on US drivers. In May 2011 I did this story: Contracts for IntelliDrive MnDOT Military-Industrial/U of M plan to GPS-track all cars. This data dump continues the story.

There are a few important angles: comprehensive vehicle tracking data would be great for law enforcement, lawyers and big corporations to investigate everything in one's life, including 'retroactive surveillance' of previous activities. However, the "fees" that would be imposed on rural Minnesotans who have to drive around a lot would be quite burdensome.

From a quick look at the PDFs we find internal discussion points about such impending scams as 'carbon credit' trading (a greenwashing Goldman Sachs sponsored futures bubble, as Matt Taibbi reported). Additionally Raytheon and SAIC have both been involved in this "Intellidrive" national-scale super-project. Also, just because the user data is processed behind Battelle's firewall in no way signifies any level of security of personal information.

The main block of data posted is in huge Acrobat Reader X sized PDF files (1.1 and 1.6GB) . We have mirrored around the files and checked with md5hash in case the govt pulls any later. Acrobat Reader X is kinda bogging on these giant files -- it loads all the emails in a slow email reader-like interface). Plenty of items like "concept of operations" or "MBUF CONOPS" is in there, a lot of stuff about consultants. We are just starting to peer at it, but Adobe is difficult to work with (a svelte 400MB app yay).

To get this batch of files yourself, if you have UNIX wget for mirroring:

$ wget -mb ftp://ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outbound/chiefcounsel/Nate%20Hansen%20Email/

I definitely recommend installing wget for things like this, where the files are listed in a directory for quick scraping.

//////////////

DATA EXTRACTION BONUS CHALLENGE: To open the attachments on these emails, for OSX you have to use a program such as the free MailRaider: Download MailRaider for Mac - Read Outlook .msg files on your Mac. This is what you gotta do - in Acrobat, hit the paperclip on the side:

acrobatreader.png

After first picking out the individual PDF attachments in Acrobat (the paperclip icon) you can get it to open in MailRaider. Hit the 'Open' button in that side panel. Hopefully this will launch MailRaider. In MailRaider, flip open the sidebar you can get it to work like so:

mailraider.png

Here is the first PDF I was able to extract - Intell~1.pdf (2MB) - it is a "business sensitive" presentation by military-industrial contractor Battelle to MnDOT. Let's have some choice excerpts including particularly how they use taxing people driving around rural-ish places like Wright County as a target for the mileage tax.

mndotcake000.png mndotcake001.png mndotcake002.png mndotcake003.png mndotcake004.png mndotcake005.png mndotcake006.png mndotcake007.png mndotcake008.png mndotcake009.png mndotcake010.png mndotcake011.png mndotcake012.png mndotcake013.png mndotcake014.png mndotcake015.png mndotcake016.png mndotcake017.png mndotcake018.png mndotcake019.png mndotcake020.png

What could possibly go wrong?!

mndotcake021.png

It is always sad to see fine open source techs like GnuPG used to encrypt tracking data. Damn you Technocratic Capitalism!

mndotcake022.png mndotcake023.png

This is pretty alarming. Sterns, Wright, etc are counties full of peopl that can't afford to pay more.

mndotcake025.png mndotcake026.png

LOOKS LEGIT:

mndotcake027.png mndotcake028.png

So this is just one extracted PDF from a single email. If Battelle was actually a front for malicious space aliens who want all the inhabitants of this planet tagged and tracked, I would not be surprised!

///////////////

MIRROR ADDRESSES: Here is the first mirror of it. These files are big enough to crash your browser - maybe rightclick & Save As link so the PDF plugin doesn't keel over... I don't think we'll need tons of mirrors for this, but it's good to have a couple around.

the big ones are at:

http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun... & also:

http://hongpong.com/files/mndotcake/Public%20QAM.pdf
http://hongpong.com/files/mndotcake/Public%20CommVault.pdf

dfc0fd1d4d6bdbcaf0498a50ee0f5fec Public CommVault.pdf 1.22 GB on disk (1,216,990,533 bytes)

cec386cc20000b7fe10297fc3ca0cdab Public QAM.pdf 1.7 GB on disk (1,698,431,132 bytes)

If you find gems tweet em with hashtag #mndotcake. If you find an open source way to work with files this big let us know. It will take some people to work on this. We invite people to occupythecomms.cc group infocake for looking at PDFs - this has group writing pads available (very easy, much like googledocs). Info on occupythecomms: https://occupythecomms.cc/pages/view/90009/activism-and-collaborative-media-methods

On the indymedia mirror the directoryIndex isn't cooperating yet (no folders list) but the files are here. The big ones are in bold, not too much in the others so far found.

You can generate a list of your wget mirror like this with:

$ find -name \*

http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outbound
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outbound/chiefcounsel/Nate%20Hansen%20Email/Public%20QAM.pdf
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outbound/chiefcounsel/Nate%20Hansen%20Email/Public%20CommVault.pdf

http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outbound/chiefcounsel/Nate%20Hansen%20Email/QAM%20Redactions/Fwd_%206_5_07%20Commissioner's%20Staff%20Meeting%20Minutes16.pdf
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outbound/chiefcounsel/Nate%20Hansen%20Email/QAM%20Redactions/Fwd_%206_5_07%20Commissioner's%20Staff%20Meeting%20Minutes27.pdf
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outbound/chiefcounsel/Nate%20Hansen%20Email/QAM%20Redactions/Fwd_%206_5_07%20Commissioner's%20Staff%20Meeting%20Minutes26.pdf
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outbound/chiefcounsel/Nate%20Hansen%20Email/QAM%20Redactions/Fwd_%206_5_07%20Commissioner's%20Staff%20Meeting%20Minutes3.pdf
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outbound/chiefcounsel/Nate%20Hansen%20Email/QAM%20Redactions/Fwd_%206_5_07%20Commissioner's%20Staff%20Meeting%20Minutes9.pdf
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outbound/chiefcounsel/Nate%20Hansen%20Email/QAM%20Redactions/Fwd_%206_5_07%20Commissioner's%20Staff%20Meeting%20Minutes13.pdf
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outbound/chiefcounsel/Nate%20Hansen%20Email/QAM%20Redactions/Fwd_%206_5_07%20Commissioner's%20Staff%20Meeting%20Minutes8.pdf
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outbound/chiefcounsel/Nate%20Hansen%20Email/QAM%20Redactions/Fwd_%206_5_07%20Commissioner's%20Staff%20Meeting%20Minutes29.pdf
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outbound/chiefcounsel/Nate%20Hansen%20Email/QAM%20Redactions/Fwd_%206_5_07%20Commissioner's%20Staff%20Meeting%20Minutes10.pdf
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outbound/chiefcounsel/Nate%20Hansen%20Email/QAM%20Redactions/Fwd_%206_5_07%20Commissioner's%20Staff%20Meeting%20Minutes5.pdf
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outbound/chiefcounsel/Nate%20Hansen%20Email/QAM%20Redactions/Fwd_%206_5_07%20Commissioner's%20Staff%20Meeting%20Minutes11.pdf
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outbound/chiefcounsel/Nate%20Hansen%20Email/QAM%20Redactions/Fwd_%206_5_07%20Commissioner's%20Staff%20Meeting%20Minutes12.pdf
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outbound/chiefcounsel/Nate%20Hansen%20Email/QAM%20Redactions/Fwd_%206_5_07%20Commissioner's%20Staff%20Meeting%20Minutes19.pdf
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outbound/chiefcounsel/Nate%20Hansen%20Email/QAM%20Redactions/r_phone%20for%2027th%20and%2028th....and%20a%20TIP!%20_).pdf
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outbound/chiefcounsel/Nate%20Hansen%20Email/QAM%20Redactions/Fwd_%206_5_07%20Commissioner's%20Staff%20Meeting%20Minutes17.pdf
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outbound/chiefcounsel/Nate%20Hansen%20Email/QAM%20Redactions/Fwd_%206_5_07%20Commissioner's%20Staff%20Meeting%20Minutes22.pdf
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outbound/chiefcounsel/Nate%20Hansen%20Email/QAM%20Redactions/Fwd_%206_5_07%20Commissioner's%20Staff%20Meeting%20Minutes6.pdf
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outbound/chiefcounsel/Nate%20Hansen%20Email/QAM%20Redactions/6_5_07%20Commissioner's%20Staff%20Meeting%20Minutes.pdf
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outbound/chiefcounsel/Nate%20Hansen%20Email/QAM%20Redactions/RE_%20Dieringer%20Pre-Award---IMPORTANT!!!!.pdf
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outbound/chiefcounsel/Nate%20Hansen%20Email/QAM%20Redactions/Fwd_%206_5_07%20Commissioner's%20Staff%20Meeting%20Minutes15.pdf
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outbound/chiefcounsel/Nate%20Hansen%20Email/QAM%20Redactions/RE_%20Dieringer%20Pre-Award---IMPORTANT!!!!3.pdf
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outbound/chiefcounsel/Nate%20Hansen%20Email/QAM%20Redactions/Ray's%20requests.pdf
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outbound/chiefcounsel/Nate%20Hansen%20Email/QAM%20Redactions/r_RE_%20Dieringer%20Pre-Award---IMPORTANT!!!!2.pdf
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outbound/chiefcounsel/Nate%20Hansen%20Email/QAM%20Redactions/Fwd_%206_5_07%20Commissioner's%20Staff%20Meeting%20Minutes30.pdf
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outbound/chiefcounsel/Nate%20Hansen%20Email/QAM%20Redactions/Fwd_%206_5_07%20Commissioner's%20Staff%20Meeting%20Minutes.pdf
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outbound/chiefcounsel/Nate%20Hansen%20Email/QAM%20Redactions/Fwd_%206_5_07%20Commissioner's%20Staff%20Meeting%20Minutes28.pdf
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outbound/chiefcounsel/Nate%20Hansen%20Email/QAM%20Redactions/r_Re_%20MNDOT_MBUF%20Discussion%20guide%20v2.DOC%20(Lucy's%20out%20of%20the%20office%20).pdf
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outbound/chiefcounsel/Nate%20Hansen%20Email/QAM%20Redactions/Fwd_%206_5_07%20Commissioner's%20Staff%20Meeting%20Minutes18.pdf
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outbound/chiefcounsel/Nate%20Hansen%20Email/QAM%20Redactions/Attachments/r_6%205%2007%20Commissioner's%20Staff%20Meeting%20Minutes.pdf
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outbound/chiefcounsel/Nate%20Hansen%20Email/QAM%20Redactions/Fwd_%206_5_07%20Commissioner's%20Staff%20Meeting%20Minutes2.pdf
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outbound/chiefcounsel/Nate%20Hansen%20Email/QAM%20Redactions/Fwd_%206_5_07%20Commissioner's%20Staff%20Meeting%20Minutes20.pdf
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outbound/chiefcounsel/Nate%20Hansen%20Email/QAM%20Redactions/r_This%20should%20do%20it!.pdf
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outbound/chiefcounsel/Nate%20Hansen%20Email/QAM%20Redactions/Fwd_%206_5_07%20Commissioner's%20Staff%20Meeting%20Minutes%20-%20No%20major%20issues%20FYI.pdf
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outbound/chiefcounsel/Nate%20Hansen%20Email/QAM%20Redactions/Fwd_%206_5_07%20Commissioner's%20Staff%20Meeting%20Minutes25.pdf
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outbound/chiefcounsel/Nate%20Hansen%20Email/QAM%20Redactions/Fwd_%206_5_07%20Commissioner's%20Staff%20Meeting%20Minutes7.pdf
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outbound/chiefcounsel/Nate%20Hansen%20Email/QAM%20Redactions/r_This%20should%20do%20it!2.pdf
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outbound/chiefcounsel/Nate%20Hansen%20Email/QAM%20Redactions/r_RE_%20Help_!_.pdf
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outbound/chiefcounsel/Nate%20Hansen%20Email/QAM%20Redactions/Fwd_%206_5_07%20Commissioner's%20Staff%20Meeting%20Minutes14.pdf
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outbound/chiefcounsel/Nate%20Hansen%20Email/QAM%20Redactions/r_headin'%20home%20with%20MBUF%20as%20my%20bedmate....pdf
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outbound/chiefcounsel/Nate%20Hansen%20Email/QAM%20Redactions/Fwd_%206_5_07%20Commissioner's%20Staff%20Meeting%20Minutes24.pdf
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outbound/chiefcounsel/Nate%20Hansen%20Email/QAM%20Redactions/r_Selection%20Committee%20%20(Just%20In%20Case)%20.pdf
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...).pdf
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outbound/chiefcounsel/Nate%20Hansen%20Email/QAM%20Redactions/Fwd_%206_5_07%20Commissioner's%20Staff%20Meeting%20Minutes21.pdf
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outbound/chiefcounsel/Nate%20Hansen%20Email/QAM%20Redactions/Fwd_%206_5_07%20Commissioner's%20Staff%20Meeting%20Minutes4.pdf
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outbound/chiefcounsel/Nate%20Hansen%20Email/QAM%20Redactions/Fwd_%206_5_07%20Commissioner's%20Staff%20Meeting%20Minutes23.pdf
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outbound/chiefcounsel/Nate%20Hansen%20Email/QAM%20Redactions/6_5_07%20Commissioner's%20Staff%20Meeting%20Minutes2.pdf
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outbound/chiefcounsel/Nate%20Hansen%20Email/QAM%20Redactions/Fwd_%206_5_07%20Commissioner's%20Staff%20Meeting%20Minutes31.pdf
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outbound/chiefcounsel/Nate%20Hansen%20Email/CommVault%20Redactions/RECEIVED!!%20%20_)%20%20%20%20MBUF%20Presentation%20Draft_11_16_2009_415pm.pdf
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outbound/chiefcounsel/Nate%20Hansen%20Email/CommVault%20Redactions/RE_%20Temp%20classification%20is%20here!_02_09_2011_128pm.pdf
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outbound/chiefcounsel/Nate%20Hansen%20Email/CommVault%20Redactions/RE_%20Temp%20classification%20is%20here!_02_09_2011_136pm.pdf
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outbound/chiefcounsel/Nate%20Hansen%20Email/CommVault%20Redactions/RE_%20Temp%20classification%20is%20here!_02_09_2011_133pm.pdf
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outbound/chiefcounsel/Nate%20Hansen%20Email/CommVault%20Redactions/RE_%20Temp%20classification%20is%20here!_02_08_2011_1141am.pdf
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outbound/chiefcounsel/Nate%20Hansen%20Email/CommVault%20Redactions/RE_%20CONSULTANT%20CONTRACTs_last%20night!_12_02_2009_1127am.pdf
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outbound/chiefcounsel/Nate%20Hansen%20Email/CommVault%20Redactions/RE_%20Temp%20classification%20is%20here!_02_08_2011_1130am.pdf
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outbound/chiefcounsel/Nate%20Hansen%20Email/CommVault%20Redactions/RE_%20CONSULTANT%20CONTRACTs_last%20night!_12_02_2009_1132am.pdf
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outbound/chiefcounsel/Nate%20Hansen%20Email/CommVault%20Redactions/RE_%20News%20from%20Mileage%20Based%20User%20Fee%20Alliance%20(MBUFA)_04_11_2011_309pm.pdf
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...
http://tc.indymedia.org/files/mndotcake/ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/outboun...

/////////////////

Here is the MD5 hashes for all these files. (for fingerprinting/verification of file uniqueness, accept no substitutes). There are a bunch of apparently empty emails in "redactions" directories - or going to try another PDF reader to see if something is hiding.

a1541603442a1f0a6c2c7487c947e35b Hansen, Nathan 4_20_2011.xlsx

dfc0fd1d4d6bdbcaf0498a50ee0f5fec Public CommVault.pdf 1.22 GB on disk (1,216,990,533 bytes)

cec386cc20000b7fe10297fc3ca0cdab Public QAM.pdf 1.7 GB on disk (1,698,431,132 bytes)

$ cd QAM\ Redactions/

$ md5sum *

2bd53b4d4cfdf5735c6acb3d78dcac68 6_5_07 Commissioner's Staff Meeting Minutes.pdf

ac02fb8d2d000af38df63e9d6804a5bd 6_5_07 Commissioner's Staff Meeting Minutes2.pdf

bb562e176106b9436968ec57312fd74c Fwd_ 6_5_07 Commissioner's Staff Meeting Minutes - No major issues FYI.pdf

cbbb2e9d9d81892a865d6539216d768c Fwd_ 6_5_07 Commissioner's Staff Meeting Minutes.pdf

5294e1ef211a8a2de42749ab525b53ff Fwd_ 6_5_07 Commissioner's Staff Meeting Minutes10.pdf

dba29ffb9fc67b3a389dbfc7e67ea8f7 Fwd_ 6_5_07 Commissioner's Staff Meeting Minutes11.pdf

e77272f7a0b33506dbf7e284f553bc58 Fwd_ 6_5_07 Commissioner's Staff Meeting Minutes12.pdf

8b0f53991f8b62fc2d1c92407839a4cc Fwd_ 6_5_07 Commissioner's Staff Meeting Minutes13.pdf

a6b449f524250717b8fcdbac45abe537 Fwd_ 6_5_07 Commissioner's Staff Meeting Minutes14.pdf

c0b806598d33db35b25a167558e61dca Fwd_ 6_5_07 Commissioner's Staff Meeting Minutes15.pdf

3243ea3f27b71c5da5d8aa146033fd45 Fwd_ 6_5_07 Commissioner's Staff Meeting Minutes16.pdf

091a17b9fd52dcb52f8ee9f2e1087426 Fwd_ 6_5_07 Commissioner's Staff Meeting Minutes17.pdf

61f4122e7d61e84099bcd39479c389a0 Fwd_ 6_5_07 Commissioner's Staff Meeting Minutes18.pdf

f8537cda72dc63a7dd3e6fd5bdf96f80 Fwd_ 6_5_07 Commissioner's Staff Meeting Minutes19.pdf

1dc010c5ff89962ae132c242d99cdd4e Fwd_ 6_5_07 Commissioner's Staff Meeting Minutes2.pdf

d005b7b9edf6acf4046e57f0f157b098 Fwd_ 6_5_07 Commissioner's Staff Meeting Minutes20.pdf

0b9c231b2a572b29bc0b26e533b49416 Fwd_ 6_5_07 Commissioner's Staff Meeting Minutes21.pdf

9234a884059b1667134a3a60438da49d Fwd_ 6_5_07 Commissioner's Staff Meeting Minutes22.pdf

16095da57ce2c90ab73ea3acb470231a Fwd_ 6_5_07 Commissioner's Staff Meeting Minutes23.pdf

e834fc715abed962a5926db379b7d47b Fwd_ 6_5_07 Commissioner's Staff Meeting Minutes24.pdf

44bc416f5ed69a62dbc3284bddf45be4 Fwd_ 6_5_07 Commissioner's Staff Meeting Minutes25.pdf

93db674814645af1a9b2e3b86e0cedbb Fwd_ 6_5_07 Commissioner's Staff Meeting Minutes26.pdf

7dfb0294d4e9916117d48f87399396b4 Fwd_ 6_5_07 Commissioner's Staff Meeting Minutes27.pdf

0d1e549ec6911fb272c273cc9cdb85d2 Fwd_ 6_5_07 Commissioner's Staff Meeting Minutes28.pdf

af0b4c77b40a92f007f6de0937689666 Fwd_ 6_5_07 Commissioner's Staff Meeting Minutes29.pdf

14ad0e9eaf2a1ec784a7f64a4677d1fd Fwd_ 6_5_07 Commissioner's Staff Meeting Minutes3.pdf

eb3c3a2ab081cd011cb8dc3cc4220c17 Fwd_ 6_5_07 Commissioner's Staff Meeting Minutes30.pdf

babb6166d521b7bd5e3da38e549101b9 Fwd_ 6_5_07 Commissioner's Staff Meeting Minutes31.pdf

faa33837481a7ea9ce5389301005d276 Fwd_ 6_5_07 Commissioner's Staff Meeting Minutes4.pdf

ec283884cf4eb57c1902f554c6daf88a Fwd_ 6_5_07 Commissioner's Staff Meeting Minutes5.pdf

fd3955363a06c5e4f073b9a0eb685dce Fwd_ 6_5_07 Commissioner's Staff Meeting Minutes6.pdf

9bb8bb439de8ebd31245d9e5c8039ba1 Fwd_ 6_5_07 Commissioner's Staff Meeting Minutes7.pdf

7e8d8bf30cb1979c98d26b68f74b4354 Fwd_ 6_5_07 Commissioner's Staff Meeting Minutes8.pdf

5e691539c7ab6721cd39e1739a63c977 Fwd_ 6_5_07 Commissioner's Staff Meeting Minutes9.pdf

eaf5422b97c8ada9bc1a2e2eebfef0bf Fwd_ MNDOT_DOCS-#573688-v3-MBUF_EXEC_SUMM.DOC.pdf

17f5832daf02053ece137906874516a2 Fwd_ Re_ CANCELED TONIGHT.pdf

4324e83ef735d5e77d99dfd22044224f Fwd_ Re_ Contract 90815 with The Dieringer Research Group; Mileage Based User Fee et al.pdf

3b7488cce7ecd2166663f08279cfc3dd Fwd_ Russian exchange program.pdf

fdd5552a9a0a29ea87998d4836e80e96 RE_ Dieringer Pre-Award---IMPORTANT!!!!.pdf

d0658a06b65516fca4053fc9b36ecb8c RE_ Dieringer Pre-Award---IMPORTANT!!!!3.pdf

0dbcad4857d9b6403a2e853cd78c6972 RE_ Dieringer Pre-Award.pdf

a1d456e7e7b594fe400f3848aa11e98c RE_ Dieringer Pre-Award3.pdf

6fd5adfd694451487ccdf26373eeab55 Ray's requests.pdf

39468301435c56e3ec93fc588c92819a Re_ Fwd_ Fox 9 follow up.pdf

58e487d24be75a7d253941dde63b08fc Re_ Fwd_ UPA.pdf

f01b3471912eedfdba901c0c593de83a Re_ Fwd_ UPA2.pdf

d3b3a8c4347947539ca68b1e9c1d6e51 Re_ MBUF_ Invoice Questions.pdf

b063347fb895a472d4dbfd830646ddad r_Final payment on MBUF.pdf

d215cb89c3fd54140daf25b9ef8284ce r_MBUF Session at Research Conference.pdf

5b355449e4377a26817cd4c6811596bf r_MBUF_EXEC_SUMM.DOC.pdf

62531bda63cf387a9af54c603c485f05 r_MNDOT_DOCS-#573688-v3-MBUF_EXEC_SUMM.DOC.pdf

9d58ff05a42d717ab21fb16b025ae57a r_One-pager on MBUF.pdf

00498befc398512b83fd12a504885117 r_RE_ Couple quick thoughts for the morning....pdf

f7f56814799552a8c7623a05651abf6a r_RE_ Dieringer Pre-Award---IMPORTANT!!!!2.pdf

21f3cd6184330313fd4c968a7f028cbd r_RE_ Dieringer Pre-Award2.pdf

44b00634488d6c0a4047f001d0458fe0 r_RE_ EGADS___.pdf

ab4a3171454d293faf05282fd2d83eec r_RE_ Help_!_.pdf

0fd3fb1e29875e32749ea7c14c04c3f4 r_RE_ RE_ MBUF 3 Informational Materials.doc.pdf

326fc5ab634d7bfedb4c1bb5f301f2c0 r_RE_ Revised Proposal.pdf

4653657972f849fd9a1c7054079d000c r_RE_ Weighting issue_ new thought_.pdf

c61c3d6a1ef1be417f9d00c7be8b77cb r_RE_ dang, did it again.....pdf

91179ab7d3629f5762bd8e18ab4afca5 r_RE_ tomorrow_ or... in the meantime....pdf

08d3bea45066ef0c5d509828947797d8 r_RFI Responses.pdf

e507c028247157bf0860a7ed793f429a r_RFI Responses2.pdf

9cb9fe08acb375b3ddfbedfb27c640fe r_RFI Responses3.pdf

3d9ee0668e57b78f837885a77e7afe80 r_Re_ WANT INPUT FROM RW_KM- Re_ Notes from the second pretest.pdf

477daab48437d06bbc3d48763f849c09 r_Re_ Any MBUF updates_.pdf

5db8f9421c5edf2810be6964febc0d4c r_Re_ Budget review.pdf

4606fdd159fd22f59b610edfddd6e8ca r_Re_ Checking in.....pdf

51f6f0c7e5b327a6378b96dc2d0ba936 r_Re_ Contract 90815 with The Dieringer Research Group; Mileage Based User Fee et al.pdf

4ab4226505ba43336ca2ddfb864de016 r_Re_ Contract 90815 with The Dieringer Research Group; Mileage Based User Fee et al2.pdf

c980c15aa1358178a1766ce97f04f090 r_Re_ Contract 90815 with The Dieringer Research Group; Mileage Based User Fee et al3.pdf

37258df0b414af50f8c64d51e0bcf500 r_Re_ Contract 93707.pdf

63c77560c995c1f95af81637e25a0cbf r_Re_ Div. Directors.pdf

fb76beed27f4086fc713c6d6bc59159c r_Re_ Final payment on MBUF.pdf

0c045b993642661cfc57e47d2998f539 r_Re_ Focus Groups_ MBUF.pdf

13369f6c2c7d1f15947be9f5451ecf3e r_Re_ MBUF FAQ.pdf

c0f66f0d95a6bb505dfe5a152f4a6d04 r_Re_ MBUF FAQ2.pdf

6768b6bb46892736ca405151827dc3e1 r_Re_ MBUF FAQ3.pdf

5548eb744fdefe5edc438d777aee0e7b r_Re_ MBUF Posting.pdf

f452cc41fb449ac5a532fe69e36f9aae r_Re_ MBUF TRB Paper.pdf

fdc671465cca77c1ac28c624c66eec60 r_Re_ MBUF TRB Paper2.pdf

15fdbfc26e9c1d7d1d75bebf19bd3d4b r_Re_ MBUF TRB Paper3.pdf

f9064a7d54b55dbdfee12201f5a6d6fb r_Re_ MBUF TRB Paper4.pdf

1ea6c324c4810a187fbb466f090e9dc8 r_Re_ MBUF TRB Paper5.pdf

ee2bf6d95d1dde47efad543d7fcd72f7 r_Re_ MNDOT_MBUF Discussion guide v2.DOC (Lucy's out of the office ).pdf

908d43977c57905893b1876c3743680b r_Re_ MNDOT_MBUF Discussion guide v2.DOC.pdf

c953af1a4399e1c7186b760163d22cf4 r_Re_ PAYD Market Research.pdf

2c3ff87a050058633837b932e27ffdf3 r_Re_ Presentation of MBUF Public Perceptions Study.pdf

ab603f4bed9c05693a38a2fbbbfab8dd r_Re_ RFP Questions - 3.pdf

971fa164a5f7b261c89828bf7abc9396 r_Re_ What time do you think you will go to lunch__.pdf

1322615f623d2ad114f056d96ac22800 r_Re_ What time do you think you will go to lunch__2.pdf

2e4cac2496e0ae647c75c03336ea1365 r_Re_ What time do you think you will go to lunch__3.pdf

d1cc38d07c46de1d9603c9d0e34c9e46 r_Re_ checking on your status.pdf

b0ee689930c73f8f899ef89dc65996b0 r_Re_ project status.pdf

d98803d63a7121d7475fa402037bde55 r_Re_ project status2.pdf

75339d3c33fa450cde6aeb9f61d4cf46 r_Revised Proposal.pdf

2b719b5df5c7e94cb4c254a923a77029 r_Selection Committee (Just In Case) .pdf

9b858373c2c295719101426381877004 r_This should do it!.pdf

3e0a41234df919fc5748fb0f3733f5a0 r_This should do it!2.pdf

3c0202bf34f06fca292a363ded23d808 r_Travel Authorization Signatures.pdf

4ff5b016ecab1a8194ba82d1f3166166 r_What time do you think you will go to lunch__4.pdf

f9b137390f0e4be87d0eacc412e55cbf r_headin' home with MBUF as my bedmate....pdf

74da3639cfd3c5cad57a802cfb571df6 r_last Friday....pdf

8a720e445fbd86bae91c273b7ee94bec r_meeting today.pdf

01517f469063f9f88b231abbf3c60fe0 r_phone for 27th and 28th....and a TIP! _).pdf

1893859cb7ef79f3e8edeaa57e6d40bc r_to hear the second pretest interviews_.pdf

ec21dda39b263e35e15ffa1a7106e3d7 r_up and taking nourishment _).pdf

$ cd ../CommVault\ Redactions/

$ md5sum *

4526805e569ac612e8b47e0baa0f18c5 Bernie Lieder Update_04_12_2011_316pm.pdf

965a35632c7ee3c5b4a77953c819b6e7 Email address_04_19_2011_152pm.pdf

ea00a30ddde74758dfb632444ee17554 FW_ MBUF Online Community_02_14_2011_122pm.pdf

c30785e48c44ab468535c835ea8808ca FW_ MBUF Symposium & PAYD Insurance_03_23_2010_1002am.pdf

ae3f69040f670c509ed143bf937abeb6 FW_ MBUF_12_10_2010_1006am.pdf

1f217b45f730ab22fa987aec48ec1797 FW_ MnDOT Snapshot - Reaching Older Generations_02_23_2011_1143am.pdf

6c04c8b976f6c6615aaf1f3e553eef4a FW_ Mn_DOT MBUF RFP_08_10_2010_1032pm.pdf

be0486bbafba485cf73e797cf57cce1d FW_ TRB_01_06_2011_1148am.pdf

5dd29c7fdc005ea0d1872b7b50db4f9c FW_ Temp classification Ready for your review_11_17_2010_330pm.pdf

da1c6529e24b3aeb622e465810d2493d FW_ Terminology for legislation_12_02_2010_832am.pdf

60526ffba0b83ed3ca2de4b1d0ee4d93 FW_ US-2 Alternative Risk Analysis_12_02_2009_126pm.pdf

356efd4378b9f723631510c6da3ab9ec FW_ my schedule_06_02_2010_339pm.pdf

8134913b6cb4291df781450444fad923 Fw_ MBUF project name_03_18_2011_405pm.pdf

4806c46d5527908e4f5d6d69ecc3fb9e Fw_ MnDOT Snapshot - Reaching Older Generations_02_23_2011_358pm.pdf

03a2a1ca03c16fb5b1cbec671111a729 Fw_ TRB_01_06_2011_937am.pdf

14db70ba2b1af71c30c850b9a6470dd5 Hansen, Nathan 4_20_2011.xlsx

abb315692a9475591a3f3ebebb2ca0df I-394_05_20_2010_848am.pdf

484c3fad46b8460e8cc8e024d44b2eda Letter to Administration and IPAD_02_21_2011_221PM.pdf

30f936b3baf79c8a3f4adf0c37b9cd17 MBUF Exec Summ in one pager template.docx_02_24_2010_139pm.pdf

54447e231cc5e7d1d12d52cfcb2cb51e MBUF Online Community_02_11_2011_1223pm.pdf

8144d33f994c47817ec2ea44e06ec98a MBUF Project_02_08_2011_143pm.pdf

b27c2fdf06cd476d21c4e66b772d3fb1 MBUF_10_22_2010_839am.pdf

be348e1362ac6ccece5756bcf754d3f1 MBUF_11_30_2009_1013am.pdf

c4b6a0285baa57dfd06cc49e19228773 Mbuf name_02_23_2011_1141am.pdf

274c29d8c6e94608478aa42efaad281e MnDOT & Communispace weekly call agenda_02_25_2011_919am1.pdf

71d3478d4d6332dc22e6c575ef2e0512 MnDOT & Communispace weekly call agenda_02_25_2011_919am2.pdf

39d76453ecd31324635d95e3891e9d13 MnDOT Snapshot - Reaching Older Generations_02_22_2011_943am.pdf

671fe8c19a2f81667a52fe78075655b1 MnDOT Snapshot - Reaching Older Generations_02_22_2011_944am.pdf

b135755acaa77b327ddd2f8339179b0c RECEIVED!! _) MBUF Presentation Draft_11_16_2009_415pm.pdf

886befdaa2332b043dc63e9800f8f6f6 RE_ CONSULTANT CONTRACT EXPIRATION ALERT_12_01_2009_1035am.pdf

d63301b6ab7408fd335ecd01c22bfba9 RE_ CONSULTANT CONTRACT EXPIRATION ALERT_12_01_2009_1059am.pdf

c3c35a0da620de7e9fabf3e281b33cd1 RE_ CONSULTANT CONTRACTs_last night!_12_02_2009_1127am.pdf

66c4c8e5721a887186ef32c29e24ff93 RE_ CONSULTANT CONTRACTs_last night!_12_02_2009_1132am.pdf

78d6d6ef56ecfc67fcaf61e5a332127a RE_ I-394_05_20_2010_902am.pdf

05df7eaf8b317c80f13820f1e1cee14b RE_ IntelliDrive MBUF Project_12_16_2009_333pm.pdf

2b7f16e797a7a0c6ad62c7ed1333b8f5 RE_ IntelliDrive MBUF Project_12_16_2009_810am.pdf

9a0cec08313abcf1c9ca70c658f80e14 RE_ Letter to Administration and IPAD_02_22_2011_927AM.pdf

e30e6e048ba92ef1a599a2600bd6498f RE_ MBUF Exec Summ in one pager template.docx_02_24_2010_154pm.pdf

70c7b32debe5a55e2f8f2d67bebb76b8 RE_ MBUF Focus Group_01_17_2011_511pm.pdf

50e47e4450bab89d5500f5eb35a036a4 RE_ MBUF Online Community_02_11_2011_1225pm.pdf

92fcfc9630992a333dc3b46bd48732c4 RE_ MBUF Online Community_02_11_2011_1231pm.pdf

f027c45acab6e57b1d36e24d0ee93772 RE_ MBUF Online Community_02_15_2011_1100am.pdf

a1b6ce5cde68ea77a9c23c95ea8dcb9a RE_ MBUF Online Community_02_15_2011_1129am.pdf

deb5838863a641688c6e7c85ece7b5db RE_ MBUF Policy Kick-Off Meeting_12_01_2010_1236pm.pdf

7899b2e46e7bbc1d7d3dab6b67204ef8 RE_ MBUF Policy Study Draft Online Survey Approach_02_03_2011_1206pm.pdf

04a3bd71953c8a3116c6d5302d71b583 RE_ MBUF news release going out today_04_18_2011_419pm.pdf

0f97d747bd627273951ae52d9f47af52 RE_ MBUF news release going out today_04_18_2011_506pm.pdf

5d7c9d7b938d012327ad74e8adc1c6ef RE_ MBUF news release going out today_04_18_2011_603pm.pdf

1108a01bc5647242129db848b1968ad0 RE_ MBUF project name_03_18_2011_424pm.pdf

9d04bdc4f3d47bd9aa6a42cc86e8111c RE_ MBUF project name_03_18_2011_425pm.pdf

e1b29a363a67381a2bf62b520b81c54b RE_ MBUFF meeting today; cancelling_04_15_2011_215pm.pdf

2b62cff8e2356af2367a533757fecd3c RE_ MBUFF meeting today; cancelling_04_18_2011_830am.pdf

8c6f28f8bfad5e6269be821d90a38ef3 RE_ MBUF_11_30_2009_1149am.pdf

e44110f22e541bd4e66165e507305409 RE_ MBUF_12_10_2010_1103am.pdf

999925ec95ed3a13e110e798bf1555c1 RE_ MBUF_12_10_2010_1111am.pdf

27a82743582cefc14bb61353f8551a06 RE_ MBUF_12_10_2010_950am.pdf

27956fe15cf55ca0c7f0287b03148ea6 RE_ MBUF_12_10_2010_953am.pdf

81af256a23a3809ff8bb8d622b70d4a0 RE_ MBUF_12_10_2010_954am.pdf

3e13a81758d56493a83f5c7428ed370b RE_ MBUF_12_10_2010_955am.pdf

19d4fb79563af9ee4d8fdd44b9ee2508 RE_ MBUF_12_10_2010_957am.pdf

f9f6f496419b156db9f74f4f7683f83b RE_ MNDOT & Communispace weekly call - 2_15_02_17_2011_236pm.pdf

5b8361f64e68eab5c8a8342fbcfda50d RE_ Mbuf name_02_23_2011_1144am.pdf

006f09322d12e50fb6f0f819bea23fbe RE_ Media contact-mileage based user fee_04_19_2011_319pm.pdf

f1ee5606964818951a6c908260505a4a RE_ MnDOT & Communispace weekly call agenda - NOTES_02_28_2011_957am1.pdf

cb9614632da4c99f2b63cab39767a502 RE_ MnDOT & Communispace weekly call agenda - NOTES_02_28_2011_957am2.pdf

dc0c94c5bda4f38f9b50e5bbee1adeb1 RE_ MnDOT Snapshot - Reaching Older Generations_02_22_2011_504pm.pdf

4700a7736adc778ff83d49f14c6ab184 RE_ MnDOT Snapshot - Reaching Older Generations_02_23_2011_1153am.pdf

7ab57aca29541ad59aa8cb4aa735396d RE_ MnDOT Snapshot - Reaching Older Generations_02_23_2011_12483.pdf

e8021d8f7e3afdd8629541fd1a9b0cc3 RE_ MnDOT Snapshot - Reaching Older Generations_02_23_2011_1248pm.pdf

fa54ec8e94bf5fb5cdbe3fa6e1c4db9f RE_ MnDOT Snapshot - Reaching Older Generations_02_23_2011_1248pm2.pdf

3218af37335c0e06c3f3b9a011b19e39 RE_ MnDOT Snapshot - Reaching Older Generations_02_23_2011_328pm.pdf

eb696b4ffeee4e306e2eb7e484bba2d6 RE_ MnDOT Snapshot - Reaching Older Generations_02_23_2011_331pm.pdf

2dd4f45c1331c9db6bc6ad13cad669e7 RE_ MnDOT Snapshot - Reaching Older Generations_02_23_2011_331pm2.pdf

6dcab9c1d50ee4793d1c2f50ac5c1aac RE_ Mn_DOT MBUF RFP_08_11_2010_1031am.pdf

8d4ac4b9986a2dee1ebdf640cc241aa4 RE_ News from Mileage Based User Fee Alliance (MBUFA)_04_11_2011_309pm.pdf

e210a430bee280107a58c426d63a4bdd RE_ Next steps_Action Planning_12_03_2009_124pm.pdf

dd51eb0f42aea93f113ff5753b23f7f5 RE_ TRB Presentation_01_28_2011_125pm.pdf

4dc9010d0d7df27e8d5dd8689beebd0b RE_ TRB Presentation_01_28_2011_133pm.pdf

f910d3770ae1253cb5a096f9fc89be26 RE_ TRB_01_05_2011_543pm.pdf

3559e8bf7034bd767690c270c54aa1d8 RE_ TRB_01_06_2011_1111am.pdf

be8de9d4e1d3f82ab1a7567cbbbd0db2 RE_ TRB_01_06_2011_1116am.pdf

276086ae4495d14e7cbb077238747743 RE_ TRB_01_06_2011_1136am.pdf

de5827e592a282eea1853abaf717bc0d RE_ TRB_01_07_2011_840am.pdf

1e20ee8d269538d3c51f1e4a394813a9 RE_ TRB_01_07_2011_848am.pdf

29bbb01ead3b247be765ae31ccc4af0b RE_ TRB_01_24_2011_450pm.pdf

b44878a8ba14e90d657e411ad8d6f3f8 RE_ TRB_01_26_2011_620am.pdf

0c08f27a10d2e6df4d0562d7a6f1c0ff RE_ TRB_01_26_2011_801am.pdf

76495b1ee7bf01d8cd82d00f844a3df4 RE_ Temp class_02_17_2011_412pm.pdf

2f0318acfd3b1dcb960d5ea3a58a3264 RE_ Temp classification Ready for your review_11_17_2010_636pm.pdf

920a5c9704de481feb63d517712c1bbc RE_ Temp classification Ready for your review_11_18_2010_1105am.pdf

91d9a6e0ecaccd8038d737fb9e018548 RE_ Temp classification is here!_02_08_2011_1130am.pdf

f00a78733245cdb151b70161e8b0c6c6 RE_ Temp classification is here!_02_08_2011_1141am.pdf

88084dd4767ce27fb1c98cab13fe86c8 RE_ Temp classification is here!_02_09_2011_128pm.pdf

325966f645ec703d7da2d357249d6678 RE_ Temp classification is here!_02_09_2011_133pm.pdf

5c900f9cadf4e5037c0cd14da33e283c RE_ Temp classification is here!_02_09_2011_136pm.pdf

eb559b717547c18aa1ce5de7f4a334fb RE_ This AM_06_11_2010_934am.pdf

1d52160c492897b3bca16ee9df7ffa8b RE_ VM yesterday_12_05_2009_1131am.pdf

6be20bbfc07fe87eaecab816bc64e9dc RE_ another version of the policy study overview_01_07_2011_835am.pdf

3eebed34ca6fdfd6224366da55a0364e RE_ another version of the policy study overview_01_07_2011_932am.pdf

221e425208d0c9dea2da17e21cedaf78 Re_ 2010 MBUF Symposium Call March 12, 3 p.m. Central time_02_27_2010_1006am.pdf

4a7ad39b42e8063a51090e4dfc4c9ac3 Re_ Jon H.2_01_05_2011_759am.pdf

bf84169642681c0393244cbdb2661a3e Re_ Jon H._01_05_2011_838am.pdfbf84169642681c0393244cbdb2661a3e Re_ Jon H._01_05_2011_838am.pdf

ec3787db74d4c1110113c0b45f0a355e Re_ Letter to Administration and IPAD_02_22_2011_155PM.pdf

7cb7973b2280ba2688b13512ebcb7625 Re_ MBUF Policy Meeting_03_02_2011_215pm.pdf

739ed2f8cadb31733edb0fdfd97f04e7 Re_ MBUF_03_31_2011_714pm.pdf

5cabfd708b4c7a48068bcb609c853d79 Re_ MBUF_03_31_2011_824pm.pdf

4ee94529b2e9ec85f9f64693e0dff2cf Re_ MBUF_12_09_2010_911pm.pdf

2ea238fe33918e7b7eebc5ac7ec96c1e Re_ MBUF_12_10_2010_1047am.pdf

5baa528dfaecef9cd4ed408f2d94a650 Re_ MBUF_12_13_2010_746am.pdf

f7adb768801ba9af6150f1cbc9053a97 Re_ MnDOT Snapshot - Reaching Older Generations_02_23_2011_155pm.pdf

8bc02ad9e7444b670486bc1fc4f1fb2c Re_ MnDOT Snapshot - Reaching Older Generations_02_23_2011_323pm.pdf

36fdd9e21207b2267c0d13fbb8baad70 Re_ TRB_01_25_2011_148pm.pdf

7c3a94657f2afb64691f52ede7db19cb Shortened Presentation draft_11_18_2009_104pm.pdf

e82b4a99ead5133167d892c292950a64 Temp classification citations and final Attachment _11_18_2010_146pm.pdf

e3a1eb76c041f03400532d26a93c01b7 Temp classification_11_09_2010_420pm.pdf

f35b892dcd07cae5ef763765ec8e8989 VM yesterday_12_05_2009_718am.pdf

ad284dd91760b55caa43d94947bcb309 my notes from focus group_07_15_2010_1042pm.pdf

5ec009dc1d2b30fd7180043d71e431d2 my schedule_06_01_2010_306pm.pdf

df2c566cec38e930b2fc0b89c5467048 note changes per my vm on your cell...._07_22_2010_1142am.pdf

adcbf8b475c7158e8800c223e06b1783 r_VPPP Grant Apps_02_03_2011_905am.pdf

2bc792828e021379bd6508c0a8e5e808 your 3905 and 3924_ classifying data_12_21_2010_403pm.pdf

$ cd ../QAM\ Redactions/Attachments/

$ md5sum *

3fd8f0f9226e7b23383fb4e9820800ef r_0584_001.pdf

5fe5e205e8c9673a577d2acb389fbbd7 r_09xxx Dieringer 2009 FHR Cost Detail.pdf

8b56f9fb39fa8b7a6d58e2b2da23776c r_09xxx Dieringer 2009 FHR Cost Detail_for revi.pdf

e22812037eada83aecf6311eb08a7b4a r_1.30.07 Commissioners Staff Meeting Minutes.pdf

f713229f7f300f227589bd89aaad2002 r_2.06.07 Commissioners Staff Meeting Minutes.pdf

f3375414fc619ee175b5dc224a5e07a1 r_2.13.07 Commissioners Staff Meeting Minutes.pdf

22f6f34e84981638ffa263c1f5a434fd r_6 5 07 Commissioner's Staff Meeting Minutes.pdf

52a28aea5fffa90a906a41dd04d6ea5c r_Addresses_2009.pdf

8c31824d4de7622ffcffaf8d4a44fcd4 r_Fwd_ Re_ CANCELED TONIGHT.pdf

d52b1e9786833b3d758a0e642afd0507 r_Grants-dot-gov-20070522131848652_1.pdf

cf02b8b051229580d130fadce52e7a67 r_MNDOT_DOCS-#573688-v3-MBUF_EXEC_SUMM.DOC.pdf

0298e9beac45b9d02e9c3c5f3e4fae96 r_Re_ Contract 90815 with The Dieringer Research Group; Mileage Based User Fee et al.pdf

///////////////////

More on this as stuff develops. Happy tracker hunting!

ECHELON GCSB military surveillance vs New Zealand & Kim Dotcom; IRC logs on Anonymous false flag attacks viewed anew; Barrett Brown setup via #OpCartel

"<omg> i'm one of those horned rimmed guys sitting behind a desk in DC dreaming of ways to manipulate Anonymous for UK's and USA's purpose :)" Backtrace Security - Pastebin.com http://pastebin.com/KtLfurP1 -posted BY: A GUEST ON MAR 16TH, 2012 | SYNTAX: NONE | SIZE: 9.62 KB | HITS: 833 |

/// UPDATE OCT 23 1AM: YET ANOTHER SHADY OP with links to OpCartel material turns up! YE GODS! Even more #OpCartel related shadiness: Anonymous hive instantly rejects @FawkesSecurity feds/contractors/fools posting violent threat, false flag or buffoonery ///

Dragging a big post together here because it's a loose thing, happening in real time, with some old logs illustrating new predicaments from New Zealand to Texas. All of this post material is out in the open, not SpySquirrel material, but drifting by quick. Everything here seems pretty tenuous but might be useful to have for review. If nothing else there is kind of an old school global hacker madness tone tying this all together, hard to tell what is truthful & hype :-/ Mostly just raises a bunch of questions for further inquiry.

Wired is covering the Kim Dotcom case - one of the world's (literally) biggest cloud hosting provider CEOs taken down by the New Zealand government and FBI; the case is collapsing in court and it's been admitted that their NSA spy sigint equivalent GCSB was illegally spying on him - even the Prime Minister had to apologize. Suggested to search Topsy.com for "GCSB Surveillance" "GCSB Scandal" etc.

Checking into backstories kind of related to realtime events From New Zealand & found some new info from Decentralise Occupy (endarken) on Twitter. There was an #O20 anti-austerity protest this weekend and a complex surveillance scandal unfolding. I don't really agree with endarken's conclusions about a bunch of things, however there is a lot worth looking at. First the New Zealand Dotcom/Surveillance scandal - let's mainline some New Zealand surveillance state inside-Cricket fail - or here is a news clip running down the illegal NZ GovOps:

The problem with riding out a political controversy is that it makes it very hard to draw a line underneath it.

High profile resignations eventually allowed the Government to draw a line under the ACC mess.

Compare that to the problems Mr Dotcom is causing, which are numerous and largely unresolved. John Banks' involvement is still creating fallout, with the Prime Minister again having to back his coalition partner. This is despite revelations in a letter from Banks' lawyer that the Act leader - who repeatedly stated he had nothing to hide - was concerned about what journalists and Opposition MPs might do with his statements to the police - see: Key still backs Banks, despite letter.

Of course the actual statements are still to be revealed - another political grenade waiting to go off, even as related issues keep John Key occupied. David Shearer's claim that there was a video of the PM discussing Kim Dotcom in February clearly wasn't a knockout blow and as Patrick Gower reports, Shearer's Labour colleagues weren't exactly enthusiastic in support - see: Has Shearer's GCSB claim backfired?.

In the (un)parliamentary melee that erupted as John Key sought to correct a previous statement to the House there were no real blows landed, just some brawling that was difficult to referee - see: Jane Clifton's Smith on a hot tin roof with points-ordering. As Corin Dann points out, however, that is probably enough for the opposition at the moment: 'The fact is that the Government is now having to fight a number of fires on different fronts. It's starting to look a little rattled' - see: No 'gotcha' moment for Key.

The nature of the GCSB may also be preventing Key from dealing with the politics of the issue says Patrick Smellie: 'If lawyers are unwilling to be open about the truth, spy agencies are both obliged and pathologically inclined to withhold information. He simply can't defend himself. In the process, however, his position is eroded' - see: Trust easily lost in age of new media. However, heads may be beginning to roll at the spy agency, albeit slowly, as it appears Hugh Wolfensohn - a key player in signing off on the illegal spying of Dotcom is on 'gardening leave' - see Patrick Gower's Senior spy faces sack over Dotcom debacle.

There will undoubtedly be some gardening leave on offer soon at the Ministry of Social Development. The seriousness and scale of the problem has been underlined by the head of the Government's IT programmes being ordered to do an urgent stocktake of all public computer systems in use by government departments: - see Claire Trevett's Scramble to safeguard IT systems.

Despite denials that the Minister, her office and her department had nothing to do with the outing of Ira Bailey, suspicion remains. Not least because the Minister has a track record: 'Ms Bennett has done a similar thing in the past, releasing the weekly benefit details of a solo mother who challenged a National Party policy. Green Party co-leader Metiria Turei wants a forensic investigation of the computers in Ms Bennett's office' - see: Bennett accused of breaching privacy again. There is clear evidence that Bailey's identity was known in the Beehive. Holly Ford, a member of Ms Bennett's staff, checked out Bailey's LinkedIn profile just before it was leaked to the Herald's Claire Trevett - see: Chris Keall's LinkedIn trail leads to Bennett's office - Ng.

The independent journalist at the centre of it all wasn't impressed with his source being forced into public view, but Keith Ng will be happy with the public response to his work - over $5,500 in donations so far to support his work - see: Blogger raises donations for breaking Winz story.

KimDotcom tweets a news clip on this thing unfolding & more here. Roughly speaking @endarken says... well if i can paraphrase, between the industrial surveillance on Dotcom, the new State Dept cables and others, chunks of the overall surveillance grid are getting exposed in operations from New Zealand to the US. In New Zealand right now the Dotcom surveillance issue is really cooking!


newzealand-dotcom.pngNZ-dotcom2.png

Other things from down under & thereabouts surfacing, including the industrial-strength US-backed spying campaign against MegaUpload proprietor Kim Dotcom, a combination of stuff including Australian diplomatic cables -- cables also showing PM Gillard being noticed as friendly new Leader material for Australia with a thumbs-up from US intelligence.

False Flagging Mossad website attack: Let's get to this purported IRC log @endarken highlights from many months back, which purports to show two hacker-handlers bragging about creating Anonymous false flag operations. The first idea is that "omg" tries to have "rooster" get "zeekill" to jam the Mossad's public website enough to cause a news story -- then they joke about their previous #op false flags and jeopardizing Texas journalist Barrett Brown's life by starting the #opCartel fight between Anonymous & the Zetas Mexican drug trafficking cartel. (google that one)

This could be another spoof writing (packs rather a lot of info, srsly) but it's getting a lot of renewed interest now, if the hit counter's any indication: http://pastebin.com/KtLfurP1

<rooster> Tell me what you told him.

<omg> <omg> just get zeekill to use his BR roots to hit mossad's IP for 20 hours and i'll make sure you and zeekill are free to stroll along with no more interference from "external" parties

<omg> <omg> or if you want just 8 hours

<omg> <omg> enough to have reporters verify Mossad's tango down

<omg> i'll make sure Interpol doesn't get a red notice on him

<rooster> why.

<omg> his little panda security stunt and with #antisec hacking the site is what will get his ass hauled by SUPO to Spain

<omg> this is what i call leverage

<omg> <omg> do you know it wasn't Sabu's idea to tell Anarchaos to deliver the emails?

<rooster> yes, i know abou that.

<omg> that was my work, along with other stupid Anonymous false operations such as

<omg> #opcartel, #opglobalbackout

<rooster> Yes, that's fine. i know

<rooster> about all of that.

<rooster> i want to know

<rooster> why.

<rooster> not only, why did you do it.

<rooster> why are you now

<rooster> telling people.

<omg> <omg> i'm one of those horned rimmed guys sitting behind a desk in DC dreaming of ways to manipulate Anonymous for UK's and USA's purpose :)

<rooster> if this is true.

<rooster> give me contact information.

<omg> Anonymous never had leadership that's why it was so easy in the last 6 months

<omg> tell your handlier in NYC

<omg> he'll know

<omg> FBI plays by the books

<rooster> alright. i'll be in touch then.

<omg> however guys like me in counter intelligence don't

<rooster> you'd be surprised.

<omg> oh i know

<omg> don't worry :) i have friends in JTTF

<omg> i assume your magneto's handlier?

<omg> if so call up Philip Selton in DC he's a good friend of my

<omg> tell him 'B' is up to his old tricks

<rooster> i'll look into that. that's what i needed in the first place.

<rooster> Thanks.

<rooster> im working on something of my own, it's a bit in your department, but i need to talk to someone official about it.

<omg> trying to mitigate the Strafor email damage unfortunally

<omg> did you see the assesment?

<rooster> no i did not.

<omg> ask CT in NYC

<omg> they have it

<omg> Senate Intelligence Committee will have a briefing on it next week

<rooster> oh, i don't go to that. i have someone who gives me things i request.

<omg> prob above your clearance level

<omg> anyways you know about their little group's HTP right?

<rooster> not really. but i'm interested.

<rooster> what can you tell me?

<omg> apparently in an attempt to SE, one of their guy's zeekill ran a SYN+ACK ddos against mossad.gov.il

<rooster> oh, the mossad ddos.

<rooster> done with brazil roots, right?

<omg> yep

<omg> from what i gather it's prob CDN servers

<omg> with the bandwidth that was pumped to the site

<omg> the site is on a tier 1 backbone provider with about 1gbs of total speed

<omg> their little gang has some serious bandwidth

<rooster> i guess so. would have to be a good amount to take out something on t1

<omg> haha much faster from what i guess Mossad has

<omg> think it's on a OC-24

<rooster> well, most public sites are on small servers isolated from anything important

<omg> onto a STM-64 uplink

<omg> dunno but what that anonyroot idiot hit CIA's site was pretty high too. The uplink pipe for DC's link was a OC-24

<omg> guys in DS&T had to rotate the public ip three times

<rooster> these guys are persistent fuckers, aren't they?

<omg> well it depends

<omg> most are idiots

<omg> their Anonymous-OS already has a sudoder backdoor

<omg> i think the offical dl count is close to 34K now

<rooster> that was well known

<rooster> and obvious

<omg> about their HTP group from what's read from previous intel reports. It was a splinter group that formed after the HB Gary hack

<omg> they previously use the irc skidr.us

<omg> and apparently the group rotates irc servers monthly

<rooster> i'll be right back.

<omg> figured i should give it a try and try to use their crazy members to try and mitigate the next wikileaks release

<omg> one of them did a quick demo yestoday and was able to bring down Mossad's site

<omg> *yesterday*

<omg> btw you know Israel already caught that 0xOmar kid right?

<omg> it's embarrassing to see Israel able to catch a hacker weeks after an intrusion, while we don't have CERN teams cyber readiness level to react quickly enough to large scale attacks

<rooster> back, sorry i have two other people relaying information to me.

<rooster> reading, sec.

<rooster> hes the israeli, right?

<rooster> no

<rooster> the saudi?

<omg> they caught him in SA

<rooster> yea, the saudi.

<omg> tracked him through credit card purchases

<rooster> yes, i remember when he pastebinned some ccs

<omg> it takes about 2 weeks min to just get a search warrent your whitecollar depts + SS with the DOJ for a simple id theft

<rooster> Yes, i know.

<rooster> fraud isn't just a slap on the wrist.

<omg> yes

<omg> and it's a constant battle

<omg> with DOJ versus state level id theft charges

<omg> though it's good to know cybercrime is monitering hardchats

<rooster> yeah, there are eyes on a lot of different places right now

<omg> that's good, though i'm prob the only guy in my agency trying to figure how to not mess things up with current investigations :)

<rooster> if you can disclose, who are you with?

<omg> sorry i cannot

<rooster> understandable

<rooster> just, personal curiosity.

<omg> just contact SSA Selton

<omg> he'll understand

<rooster> right.

<omg> but i'm not with you guy's at the Bureau

<omg> in fact because of the sealed DOJ docket's, I didn't even know about Xavier Monsegur being a CI

<rooster> Should have, it was actually leaked a while back.

<rooster> also i'm with the bureau, i have to state that if you return this back to anyone.

<omg> i had track down one of your contractors Backtrace to confirm it two months ago in Jan

<rooster> i have a position similar to you.

<rooster> just so that's clear.

<rooster> i don't want break any laws while doing my job.

<omg> i just don't want to mess up any existing investigations

<omg> i thought everything is need to know. Regardless everyone has TS clearance, but certain things such as knowing who is an CI is a need to know

<omg> at the Bureau

<rooster> again, i'm not with the bureau, i do what you do.

<rooster> and it is all need to know

<rooster> but if you look closely

<rooster> you can find out a lot on your own

<omg> <rooster> also i'm with the bureau, i have to state that if you return this back to anyone.

<rooster> hah. wow.

<rooster> that is a typo.

<rooster> meant to say not. i apologize.

<omg> i'm with DS

<omg> of the DOS

<rooster> ah.

<rooster> ive interacted with the bureau

<omg> i'm the guy responsible for mitigating damage caused by Jeremy Hammond sending the Strafor emails to Wikileaks

<rooster> hammon, sounds familiar.

<rooster> um

<rooster> what does he run

<rooster> he runs something, i think.

<omg> Anarchaos aka crediblethreat aka Hack This Site founder

<omg> btw did you ever use the nick moop?

<rooster> there are a few people

<rooster> that use that nick

<omg> my suggestion work with Jennifer Emick with Backtrace

<rooster> i've not worked with backtrace directly, but i've chatted to hubris before.

<omg> i've been helping Hubris aka david with some "special projects" such as injecting fake Anonymous operations such as #opcartel

<rooster> i understand about injecting fake ops, like a honeypot

<rooster> but opcartel

<rooster> was too far

<rooster> lives could have been at risk

<omg> not really, only Barret Brown's

<omg> the goal of #opcartel was to get CISEN into iranserv

<omg> and understand the leadership structure resulted in the recent Interpol South American arrests

<omg> and anonworld

<rooster> ah, so you're planting fake ops, to infiltrate.

<rooster> smart.

<omg> #opglobalbackout was a response by that anonyroot's idiot ddos of CIA.gov

<omg> so the NSA could argue for stronger monitering + domestic intelligence

<omg> inject stories such as: http://pastebin.com/pVmAZqWY

<rooster> so is that new internet monitoring bill related at all to OpDarknet?

<omg> opdarknet?

<rooster> also

<rooster> i dont tink

<omg> no it's because of the constant threat of China

<rooster> there is any validity

<rooster> in that pastebin

<omg> + guys like pr0f_srs's dump of the SCADA system

<rooster> i understand SCADA system dumps.

<rooster> how does china play into that?

<omg> and a simple ddos to CIA.gov is enough to invoke the "terrorism" arguement

<rooster> anything is enough to invoke the terrorism card

<rooster> it's so vague, it can be thrown around until it sticks.

<omg> when you have critical US infracture such as a Water Pump Facility, or your Intelligence Agency being under attack?

<rooster> why do you think the reason for monitoring the occupy movement, and various protesters was under a counter-terrorism effort?

<omg> how do you think Counter-Intelligence feels?

<rooster> i think they would feel like they need to step it up.

<rooster> and that's where you come in, correct?

<omg> yep

<omg> been doing the injections and manipulation of Anonymous' agenda at the sidelines to push for stronger FBI + NSA prescence

<omg> not everyone in DSS agrees with me

<omg> but when the head of the FBI + NSA is making these arguements to the National Security Council

<omg> ^-- Director

<omg> i've said i've did a good job in the last 5 months :)

<rooster> opcartel, an globalblackout were well recognized, i guess that means you're right

<omg> i'm not involved with Intelligence gathering of Occupy

<omg> it's the boys that are with DHS

<omg> then again they over-react to everything

<rooster> nor am i, but i've a few contacts of mine are.

<omg> shit like Anonymous hackers fucking up train lines?

<omg> yea... DHS your idiots

End of log. This log could be fake or partially fake but it draws a classic picture.

[Side note - the planted story they mention - http://pastebin.com/pVmAZqWY - is a rather silly "message for Anonymous from Mossad" which I remember thinking of as really silly...(BY: A GUEST ON FEB 12TH, 2012 | SYNTAX: NONE | SIZE: 12.71 KB | HITS: 12,109 | EXPIRES: NEVER) ]

Speculating but DSS could be Defense Security Service - http://www.dss.mil/ - which has a purview of defending the Defense Industrial Base generally & that could involve efforts to catch hackers eh? It is a military agency with responsibility for aspects of guarding private contractor installations, so they would seem to have an Interface or 2 to domestic political monitoring. DSS definitely scans websites a lot & shows up in logs but has virtually no public or alt-researcher profile at all. What kinds of programs have they been up to in this exciting era? etc. [Also could be State Diplomatic Security Service but I doubt it - or the odd DOJ Domestic Security Section but that dissolved in 2009 into (this is not a TV show probably): Criminal Division: the Human Rights and Special Prosecutions Section.

Any place run from Quantico AND bonus Fort Meade DISCO Summary from their site:

About Us

The Defense Security Service (DSS) is an agency of the Department of Defense(DoD) located in Quantico, Virginia with field offices throughout the United States. The Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence provides authority, direction and control over DSS. DSS provides the military services, Defense Agencies, 24 federal agencies and approximately 13,300 cleared contractor facilities with security support services.

DSS contributes to national security by serving as an interface between the government and cleared industry. DSS administers and implements the defense portion of the National Industrial Security Program pursuant to Executive Order 12829. Approximately 356 Industrial Security Representatives provide oversight and assistance to cleared contractor facilities and assist management and Facility Security Officers in ensuring the protection of U.S. and foreign classified information. DSS also facilitates classified shipments between the United States and foreign countries and implements foreign ownership, control and influence countermeasures.

The Center for Development of Security Excellence (CDSE) is located in Linthicum, Md., and provides security education and training to DoD security professionals through formal classroom and distributed learning methodologies (i.e., computer-based, web-based and tele-training).

The Defense IndustrialSecurity Clearance Office (DISCO), located in Fort Meade, Md., processes requests for industrial personnel security investigations and provides eligibility or clearance determinations for cleared industry personnel under the NISP.

OMG's comment on DHS - Homeland Security, collecting info on Occupy could have been related to the Critical Infrastructure stuff similar to DSS activities (as well as Federal Protective Service which has been the main FOIA released docs so far).

The Pastebin he references as a lol fake OMG - it's this crazy absurd Mossad threat missive that got tons of views at the time: http://pastebin.com/pVmAZqWY

//// Below the fold - more logs - coverage on the DOJ's system of illegal operations and signaling to cartels, and other loosely related elements ////

"Warning shot will not be fired" by MPs trained in Martial Law in America: Military Police training: heavily patrolled domestic detention facilities, dissident/sniper warrantless searches - CONPLAN 3502 Civil Disturbance Operations training @ Ft McClellan

b. Use of Deadly and Non-deadly Force (4) (b) Warning shot will not be fired.

or better yet:

(3) In an occupied building, when the dissident's/sniper's location is unknown, all suspected rooms must be searched. The action element should try to have occupants submit voluntarily to the search of their rooms. At the same time, occupants should be questioned in an attempt to pinpoint the sniper's location. If occupants will not submit voluntarily and there is probable cause to believe that the dissident/ sniper is located in the room, a complete physical search of the room or rooms should be conducted. Use of the patrol dog will help in conducting such searches.

Another planning layer for emergency domestic military operations has been published: The 2006 US Army Military Police training manual for Civil Disturbance Operations does not concern itself with warrants in the 'search' section, indicating a certain level of Constitutional disregard in the military's planning for emergencies in what the document calls CONUS, or Continental United States.

The excellent PublicIntelligence is where this just popped up (first I saw of it anyway): U.S. Army Military Police School Civil Disturbance Operations Course | Public Intelligence - Direct PDF link (115 pages).

martial-law-mp-training-front.png

///////UPDATE JULY 11: Just talked with Alex Jones for an hour on this stuff. Here's the crib notes & PDFs you'll want to see.
/////// UPDATE July 7 AM: My interview with Darren McBreen on Infowars Nightly News: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNw_m7gfqXM // Prisonplanet stories by Kurt Nimmo and "Army Manual Outlines Plan To Kill Rioters, Demonstrators In America" by Paul Watson.. Also I put it on Reddit One & Two

///////

I've only had time to read a bit of it so far, but it ties in very closely with another level of this planning framework, USNORTHCOM (Northern Command) CONPLAN 3502 Civil Disturbance Operations, which is the 21st century replacement for GARDEN PLOT, the Pentagon's plan used between the 1960s and 2002 for domestic riot control & emergency operations in such settings as the LA Riots.

In 2010 I found presentation files on a US Army Corps of Engineer server - for full story please see TC Indymedia Exclusive: Secret 'Trigger' & blueprint for emergency domestic military crackdown plan revealed. Having seen first hand domestic military operations at the 2008 Republican National Convention & 2009 G20 Pittsburgh, the growth and use of domestic military capacity for crowd control is a more-than-hypothetical situation -- and the subsequent obfuscation of those operations by political officeholders and appointees is quite terrifying in its implications.

This Civil Disturbance Operations Subcourse training manual ties right into material cited in the CONPLAN and supporting documents, including many of the same riot control weapons. An earlier version of a very similar manual can be found via that link.

martial-law-crowd-army-weapons-mp.png

Plus this one has quizzes!!

Billeting - I swear I heard something about revolutionaries complaining about billeting earlier... Something everyone makes a big deal out of this time of year....

There is a lot of stuff about formations -

P 62: Handy tip that rioter-impressing safe-port position is a PSYOP and tiring!

(a) The safe-port position is extremely useful in making a show of force before rioters. The above mentioned carrying position is the primary method of carrying weapons in the control force formation. It allows the Soldier to control both ends of the weapon while moving in and out of the formation and advancing the crowd.

All the stuff about gathering intel against rioting/unlawful Americans is nice and creepy and they definitely aren't saying anything about the Defense Intelligence Agency or National Geospatial Intelligence Agency.

[.............]

b. Collection.

(1) Military information elements having counterintelligence resources will maintain the ability to collect civil disturbance threat data during the period in which there is a distinct threat of actual civil disorder requiring the use of federal military forces.

(2) On activation by the Department of the Army, military intelligence elements having counterintelligence capability will:

(a) Establish and maintain contact with suitable local, state, and federal authorities.

(b) Collect civil disturbance data concerning incidents, and estimate the capability of civil authorities to control the situation. This can be achieved through direct contact with civil authorities.

(c) Report collection results to the Department of the Army in accordance with current plans.

(d) Keep appropriate commanders informed. (e) Provide intelligence support to the Personal Liaison Officer Chief of Staff of the Army.

(f) Recommend methods of overt collection, other than liaison, if required, to the Department of the Army for approval.

(3) Military intelligence elements may employ methods of collection other than liaison only on order of the Department of the Army.

(4) Covert agent operations are not used to obtain civil disturbance data on persons or organizations without specific advance approval of each operation by the Under Secretary of the Army.

(5) Basically, the following vital elements of data will be required for sound planning and operations once approval has been received:

(a) Objectives of elements which are a distinct threat to cause or are causing civil disturbances.

(b) Times and locations of disturbances.

(c) Cause of disturbances.

(d) Existence of persons, groups, or organizations which have distinctively threatened or are creating disturbances.

(e) Estimated number of persons who will be or are involved in civil disturbances. (f) Assembly areas for crowds.

(g) Presence and location of known leaders and persons who are a distinct threat to cause civil disturbances.

(h) Organization and activities planned by the leaders who are a distinct threat to cause civil disturbance.

(i) Source, types and locations of arms, equipment, and supplies available to the leaders who are a distinct threat to cause civil disturbance.

(j) Use of sewers, storm drains, and other underground systems by the elements who are a distinct threat to cause or are causing civil disturbances.

(k) Identification of new techniques and equipment not previously used by elements that are a distinct threat to cause civil disturbances.

(l) Attitude of general masses towards: (a) Groups causing civil disturbances. (b) Civil law enforcement authorities. (c) Federal intervention to control the disturbance.

(m) Possible threat to public property including private utilities. (n) Communications and control methods employed by elements referred to in paragraph 1 above.

PART C - Request for Federal Support/Training 1. Request for Federal Support.

a. Providing military support to state and local governments to assist them in quelling a civil disturbance or riot requires close coordination through a host of state and federal agencies. It requires a though briefing of Soldiers at all levels on what they can and cannot do with respect to law enforcement. Civil authorities must be briefed on the restrictions placed on federal forces by the Constitution of the United States, federal statutes and laws.

b. Under the Constitution of the United States and United State Codes the President is empowered to direct federal intervention in civil disturbances to:

(1) Respond to state request for aid in restoring order (2) Enforce the laws of the United States. (3) Protect the civil rights of citizens (4) Protect federal property and functions.

c. The Secretary of Defense retains approval for federal support to civil authorities involving the use of DOD forces, personnel, and equipment. The Secretary of the Army is the Department of Defense executive agent is the approval authority for federal emergency support in response to natural or man-made disasters (except weapons of mass destruction [WMD]). The Directorate of Military Support (DOMS) plans and executes the DOD domestic support mission to civil authorities. The DOMS is the DOD primary contact for all federal departments and agencies during DOD involvement in most domestic support operations. DOMS is also the staff agency responsible to the Chief of Staff, Army and Secretary of the Army for recommending to them appropriate measures necessary to cope with civil disturbances and terrorism and to transmit the approved recommendations to Department of Defense agencies for execution and to supervise the execution. The missions and functions of DOMS are outlined in AR 500-50. Additional roles of responsibilities of various agencies can be found in FM 3-19.15

Prior to activating federal military forces there is a sequence of steps that must occur. When data begins to show that a disturbance may develop into a situation that will require the help of federal forces, several actions are introduced at the federal level while state and local law enforcement agencies attempt to contain the disorder. Such actions may include increasing the readiness posture of forces named to help the jurisdiction concerned.

d. As the situation worsens and the state employs its National Guard, the U.S. Attorney General would send his personal agent to the scene of the disorder. This agent is named as the Senior Civilian Representative of the Attorney General (SCRAG) and is the organizer of all federal activities in the area of the disorder, including contact with local civil authorities. At the same time, the Chief of Staff of the U.S. Army would send his personal liaison officer (PLOCSA) to the scene along with members of the Department of the Army Liaison Team (DALT) that serves as his planning staff.

[.........] CROWD CONTROL PAGE 35+

c. Techniques for Crowd Control. There are numerous techniques designed to provide the commander with flexibility of action in accomplishing crowd control. He must select a combination which will produce the desired results within the framework of the selected crowd control option. The most common techniques appropriate for military usage are discussed below.

(1) Observation. This consists of deployment of persons or teams to the periphery of a crowd for the purpose of monitoring its activity. It includes gathering data on crowd size, location, mood, and reporting on the developing situation. This technique includes posting persons on strategic rooftops and other high terrain overlooking the crowd. This latter measure provides additional security to control force personnel should they become committed to other crowd control operations. Such a team may be composed of an expert marksman, a radio operator, and an observer equipped with binoculars. Care must be taken to assure that committed control forces are aware of the locations of such teams to prevent their being mistaken for sniper elements.

(2) Communication of Interest and Intent. In certain situations, effective communication with crowd and mob leaders and participants may enable the commander to control the situation without resorting to more severe actions. When planned and organized demonstrations, marches, or rallies within the disturbed area are announced, the control force commander in coordination with local authorities should meet with organizers of the activity in order to communicate the interest of the control forces. The following matters, as appropriate, should be discussed.

(a) Parade or demonstration permits. (b) Location of demonstration and routes of march. (c) Time limits for the activity. (d) Provision of marshals by activity organizers. (e) Prevention of violence. (f) Safety of all concerned.

(3) The task force commander and local authorities should also communicate to the activity organizers

their intent to cope with violence, unlawful actions, and violations of restrictions imposed on the activity. It is intended that, by this communication between activity organizers and control force personnel, the demonstration, rally, or parade will occur without incident through the mutual cooperation of all concerned. The intentions of control forces will not be effective if delivered as an ultimatum. A limited, begrudging dialogue with activity organizers reduces the opportunity for authorities to learn the plans of the demonstrators. It must be remembered that if this communication is not effected, the activity organizers might well hold the demonstration in defiance of local authorities, thereby creating a potential for violence that might not have existed if this technique had been employed.

d. Channelization. Pressure can be brought to bear on the dissident leadership to channel the crowd into an area which will minimize the disruption when the following requirements are met:

(1) When communications have been established with the dissident leadership.

(2) When the intent and nature of the crowd activity is known.

e. Diversion. When communication exists with the dissident leadership, consideration may be given to efforts to divert the leadership of the crowd itself from its stated or obvious objective. The diversion should support the objectives of the control force either by reducing the strength of the crowd situation or motivating the crowd to seek an area more easily controlled by the control force.

f. Cooperation. Decreasing the potential disruption of the crowd activity may be accomplished by an active attempt on the part of the control force to obtain cooperation of the dissident leadership. Whenever there is an attempt by the crowd leadership to seek permission and cooperation of the local government, every effort should be made to maximize this cooperation by demonstrating an attitude of facilitation. This may be accomplished by helping the leadership to organize a peaceful demonstration while establishing guidelines which will minimize the impact of the demonstration on the community.

g. Selection of Force Options.

(1) The commitment of federal military forces must be viewed as a drastic last resort. Their role, therefore, should never be greater than is absolutely necessary under the particular circumstances which exist. This does not mean, however, that the number of Soldiers used should be minimized. The degree of force required to control a disorder is often inversely proportionate to the number of available personnel. Doubts concerning the number of Soldiers required should normally be resolved in favor of large numbers since the presence of such large numbers may prevent the development of situations in which the use of deadly force is necessary. A large reserve of Soldiers should be maintained during civil disturbance operations. The knowledge that a large reserve force is available builds morale among military and law enforcement personnel and helps to prevent overreaction to annoying acts by unruly persons.

(2) In selecting an operational approach to a civil disturbance situation, the commander and his staff must follow the "minimum necessary force" principle; for example, crowd control formations or crowd control agents should not be used if the area filled with manpower would be sufficient.

(3) Every effort should be made to avoid appearing as an alien invading force and to present the image of a restrained and well-disciplined force whose sole purpose is to help to restore law and order with a minimum loss of life and property and due respect for those citizens whose involvement may be purely accidental. Further, while crowd control personnel should be visible, tactical, or force concentrations which might tend to excite rather than to calm should be avoided where possible.

(4) The normal reflex action of the well-trained combat Soldier to sniper fire is to respond with all firepower available. In a civil disturbance, this tactic endangers innocent people more than snipers. The preferred tactic is to allow a special reaction team (SRT) who is trained for this type of mission, to enter the building from which sniper fire starts. Keeping with the controlling principle that the team must use only the minimum force necessary to fulfill the mission, the commander may select any one of the following options for arming his Soldiers:

(a) Riot Shield. In the hands of a well trained soldier, the riot shield can be utilized as both a defensive and offensive weapon when contact is made with an aggressive crowd. The primary use of the riot shield is for defense of the line. However, each riot shield holder must be proficient in its retention. The Soldier holding the shield must be trained to react when a demonstrator grabs the top of the shield by slapping with his strong hand and gives the following command" Get back", "Get away" "Stop". If a rioter grabs the bottom of the shield the Soldier should be trained in forcefully dropping to one knee and pinning the rioters' fingers to the ground.

(b) Baton. The baton is most effective in a crowd control operation and is considered the primary weapon for crowd control operations. The baton is considered to be an offensive weapon with reduced lethality and unlike the rifle, the loss of a baton to the crowd does not create a serious threat. Soldier must be trained with the riot baton to the point its various techniques are automatic to them. This training must also include the vulnerable points on the body so they can avoid areas that may cause permanent injury or death when struck.

Currently there are two types of riot batons, wooden and expandable. The most common one is the 36 inch hickory riot baton with thong. There is also the 24-inch to 36 inch expandable riot baton, which has been added to the nonlethal capabilities set. Each Solder within the control force need to be proficiently trained in all techniques for blocking and striking. Improper use of the riot baton by an untrained Soldier has the potential for creating a greater problem than what already exist.

(c) Shotgun. The 12 gage shotgun is a pump action shotgun currently in the nonlethal capabilities set (NLCS) inventory. The pump action shotgun is chambered to take up to 3-inch shells. The 3- inch chamber allows for the use of M1012 and M1013 NL munitions. This shotgun also provides a visually distinct alternative to the standard military issues weapon.

(d) Rifle. The rifle, if capable of automatic fire, must be modified to prevent automatic operation. Keeping with the controlling principle of using only the minimum force necessary to fulfill the mission. If the Soldier are equipped with their long weapons and are in the front lines of the formation, the weapon should be carried across their back from left to right with the muzzle of the weapon pointed down and the butt of the weapon pointed up. The weapon should be cleared and the magazine in the proper ammunition pouch.

(e) Non lethal weapons and munitions. Nonlethal weapons and munitions are an additional asset afforded to the commander in civil disturbance and are preferred over lethal force. The showing of force with nonlethal weapons and munitions may assist in crowd dispersing, separate, or leave the area with minimal causalities. This nonlethal capability set (NLCS) is a well-rounded, versatile package of both equipment and munitions. NLCS are dived into four distinct categories: personnel protection, personnel effectors, mission enhancers and training devices

(f) While each of the above options represents an escalation in the level of force, they are not sequential in the sense that a commander must initially select the first option, or proceed from one to another in any particular order. So long as the option selected is appropriate, considering the

existing threat, the minimum necessary force principle is not violated.

1. The rifle and rifle with bayonet attached have extremely limited offensive use as both may constitute deadly force. The primary value of the rifle or the rifle with bayonet attached is the psychological impact on the crowd. While the use of fixed bayonets can add considerably to this effect, the danger of intentional or accidental injury to demonstrators or fellow control force personnel prevents such use except with extremely violent crowds.

2. Fire by selected marksmen. Fire by selected marksmen may be necessary under certain circumstances. Marksmen should be pre-selected, trained, and thoroughly instructed. They may be placed on vehicles, in buildings, or elsewhere as required.

3. Full firepower. The most severe measure of force that can be applied by Soldiers is that of available unit firepower with the intent of producing extensive casualties. This extreme measure would be used as a last resort only after all other measures have failed or obviously would be impractical, and the consequence of failure to completely subdue the crowd would be an imminent overthrow of the government, continued mass casualties, or similar grievous conditions.

4. Shotgun. The riot shotgun is an extremely versatile weapon; its appearance and capability also produce a strong psychological effect on rioters. It is particularly suited to certain applications in civil disturbance operations. When used with No. 00 buckshot ammunition, it is an excellent point target weapon extremely effective at limited range. By varying the nonlethal munitions' M1012 and M1013 the weapon can be employed with considerably less possibility of serious injury or death. This provides the commander with a desirable flexibility in selecting the ammunition most appropriate under the existing conditions

(g) The measures described in paragraphs 1 through 5 below, may be applied in any order as deemed suitable by the responsible commander as long as his application is consonant with prescribed confrontation management techniques outlined earlier.

(1) Proclamation. A public announcement is considered an excellent medium to make known to a crowd the intentions of the control force commander. In some cases, such an announcement makes further action unnecessary. An announcement puts the population on notice that the situation demands extraordinary military measures, prepares the people to accept military presence, tends to inspire respect from lawless elements and supports law-abiding elements, gives psychological aid to the military forces trying to restore order, and shows to all concerned the gravity with which the situation is viewed. In making a proclamation, a commander may consider imposing a time limit. However, the situation may change, and not imposing a time limit may leave the commander other options as he sees fit, as long as the proclamation is specific in its instruction.

(2) Show of Force. A show of force is effective in various situations in civil disorder control operations. A show of force may as simple as Soldier dismounting from buses or trucks in plan sight of the demonstrators, but must be far enough away to prevent a provoked attack of thrown objects. When a crowd has gathered in a large area, show of force can take the form of marching a well-equipped, highly disciplined control force into their midst. When persons are scattered throughout the disturbance area in small groups, a show of force may take the form of motor marches of Soldiers throughout the area, saturation patrolling, and the manning of static posts or similar measures.

(3) Employment of Crowd Control Formations. Crowd control formations are used to contain,

disperse, block or break up a non conforming crowd; these crowd control formations are more effective in urban areas than they are in open fields or parks. When this method is utilized in urban areas, it is easy to disperse or split the crowd into small groups, isolate instigators, or funnel a crowd into a desired area. The use of such formations is part of the show of force and has a strong psychological effect on any crowd.

(4) Employment of Water. Water from a high pressure hose may be effective in moving small groups on a narrow front such as a street or in defending a barricade or roadblock. Personnel applying water should be protected by riflemen and in some cases by shields. In the use of water, the factors discuss below should be considered.

(a) Water may be used as a flat trajectory weapon utilizing pressure, or as a high trajectory weapon using water as a rainfall. The latter is highly effective during cold weather.

(b) The use of a large water tank (750 to 1,000 gallons) and a power water pump mounted on a truck with a high pressure hose and nozzle capable of searching and traversing will enable Soldiers to use water as they advance. By having at least two such water trucks, one can be held in reserve for use when required.

(c) In using water, as with other measures of force, certain restraints must be applied. Using water on innocent bystanders, such as women and children, should be avoided; ways to escape must be provided; and the more severe use, flat trajectory application, should be used only when absolutely necessary.

(d) Fire departments are normally associated with lifesaving practices rather than maintenance of law and order. In order to maintain this image, fire department equipment will not be used for riot control and crowd dispersal.

(e) Use of Crowd Control Agents. Crowd control agents are extremely useful in civil disorder control operations because they offer a humane and effective method of reducing resistance and lessen requirements for the application of more severe measures of force. Task force commanders are authorized to delegate the authority to use crowd control agents and other forms of non lethal force at their discretion.

2. Establish Area Control.

a. General. Acts of violence, such as looting, arson, and vandalism, are greatly reduced when the physical and psychological influence of lawlessness is defeated. In establishing effective area control, commanders must recognize the problem of widespread looting and arson that has accompanied most large urban disorders. Performance of this task consists of reducing or eliminating those conditions which contribute to the outbreak or continuation of lawlessness in the disturbed area.

(1) Looting. When dealing with persons involved in looting, extreme care and adherence to the principle of minimum force must be observed. Looting may start at any time or place as an isolated incident and spread quickly throughout the affected areas. Looting is not limited to any particular sex or age group; it includes the very old, the very young, women, and children. For example, many children may be looting without any idea of how serious their actions are. In the control of looting, unit leaders must recognize that deadly force is not authorized.

(2) Anti-looting. Unit commanders must be familiar with anti-looting measures which can be taken by civil authorities, such as boarding up broken or unbroken windows, covering windows with photo-

luminescent particles, and by the prompt posting of looting penalty proclamations. Anti-looting actions that can be taken by military forces include the establishment of foot and motor patrols, the posting of fixed guard posts, and the lighting of likely areas for looting. Guards at fixed posts will be briefed not to leave their posts to pursue individual looters on foot, but to remain on post and prevent looters from approaching their areas of responsibility. All guards must be briefed that looters will not be fired upon nor will deadly force be used to catch looters.

(3) Protected or Sensitive Commercial Establishments. A main consideration in the conduct of civil disturbance operations is to prevent liquor, drugs, weapons, and ammunition from falling into the hands of rioters. Therefore, liquor stores, drug stores, sporting good shops, pawn shops, and hardware stores are main targets for looters and must be kept under close observation by means of foot and motorized patrols. Normally, businesses of this type must be identified in advance and included in emergency plans.

(4) Arson. Arson is generally defined as a crime of purposely setting fire to a building or property. Acts of setting fire to buildings, property, etc., often follow disturbances. Certain situations may arise in controlling arson where the use of deadly force is authorized and necessary.

[.........] PAGE 40

(2) Imposed Restrictions. Except in the unlikely event of martial law, federal military forces will not have the authority to impose restrictions such as a curfew on the civilian population. Certain restrictions, however, may be imposed by civilian authorities to help in the control of lawlessness. Military leaders should be prepared to recommend which restrictions are of substantial value in comparison with the burden of enforcement. The most commonly used restrictions include:

Curfew. The curfew is a control measure which has proved highly effective in many civil disturbances. Its purpose is to restrict the unauthorized movement of personnel on streets and public places during specified periods of time, especially during the hours of darkness. Joint planning with civil authorities regarding the imposition of a curfew should provide for:

(a) Coordination of the initiation, enforcement, and termination of a curfew.

(b) Public announcements of the beginning and ending of curfews. Civilian authorities make these announcements through local mass media, pamphlets, and public address systems to ensure maximum exposure.

(c) Curfew exemptions and guidance on who should receive them, including written authorization or passes.

(d) Provision for the apprehension and disposition of curfew violators.

(3) Sales Restrictions. Restrictions on the sale, transfer, and possession of sensitive material such as gasoline, firearms, ammunition, and explosives will help control forces in minimizing certain forms of violence. Limiting the availability of weapons to the potential sniper or terrorist may reduce the likelihood of such violence. The effective enforcement of these restrictions, however, requires extensive planning and the commitment of adequate manpower to this effort.

So much for the Second Amendment SUCKAZ....

[.........] PAGE 22+

f. Army Detention Facilities.

(1) The Army will not operate facilities for confinement, custody, or detention of civilian personnel apprehended for violation of local or state laws as long as civil confinement facilities, operated by the Department of Justice, state, or local agencies are sufficient to accommodate the number of persons apprehended.

(2) When it appears that available local facilities are insufficient, due to the large number of persons apprehended or detained, and this fact can be verified by the person or agency responsible for the facilities, temporary confinement/detention facilities may be operated with prior approval from DA, specifically, the Chief of Staff, U.S. Army. These facilities will be operated only until custody of the persons detained can be transferred to and assumed by civil authorities. They will not be used for the confinement of persons charged or convicted under civil jurisdiction.

(3) Temporary confinement/detention facilities can be developed from local federal facilities provided they are adaptable to the requirements of custody and control. Such facilities should be established, if possible, within the affected area; this will conserve time, transportation, and escort personnel.

However, if no suitable federal property is available within the affected area, they can be located elsewhere on any property under federal control as long as the persons to be detained are apprehended in the affected area. Whenever such temporary facilities are established during civil disturbance control operations, the Army is responsible for providing those personnel, facilities, and supplies necessary for the custody, control, health, comfort, and sustenance of persons detained.

(4) Officers and key NCOs specifically trained and experienced in confinement operations are required to operate such facilities. Guards and support function personnel operating under the direct control of such officers and NCOs need not be specifically trained or experienced in confinement operations as long as they are under close and continuing supervision of trained responsible personnel. Whenever females are detained, they must be held in physically separate detention facilities and under the control of selected female guards operating under the supervision of trained and experienced confinement personnel.

(5) Temporary detention facilities should be constructed and arranged to provide for adequate custody, control, and safety of detainees. It is advisable to use existing permanent-type buildings. Where sufficient permanent structures are not available, only that amount of new construction required for temporary custody, control, and administration of prisoners should be accomplished. Temporary field- type facilities provide compartments to assure effective control.

(6) The same operational procedures that apply to the operation of installation confinement facilities and treatment of detainees apply to these temporary facilities except that those policies and procedures establishing training, employment, mail and correspondence, and administrative discipline requirements will not apply. Detailed guidance in procedures for confinement of detainees is contained in EPW Operations, FM 3-19.40.

g. Special Equipment. Certain items of equipment available to military and civil police forces can do much to limit injuries to civilian and military personnel and destruction of property. These items increase the psychological effects of a show of force and offer additional protection and versatility to civil disturbance forces during the operations.

(1) The 12 gage shotgun is a pup action shotgun currently in the non lethal capabilities set (NLCS) inventory. The pump action shotgun is chambered to take up to 3-inch shells. The 3-inchchamber allows for the use of M1012 and M1013 NL munitions. This shotgun also provides a visually distinct alternative to standard military weapons that may be desired based on mission considerations.

(2) The shotgun, as in the case of other firearms used in civil disturbance operations, is fired only on the orders of a qualified superior officer when lesser measures of force are not effective, or when the individual Soldier has no other means of protecting his life.

(3) The M7 is a 66-millimeter vehicle-mounted NL grenade-launching device that is mounted on a HMMWV. It is a indirect fire support system that can deliver the M99 blunt trauma grenade that creates a sting-ball effect. The M315 installation kit is used to install an M7 discharger on the turret ring of appropriate HMMWV variants. An adjustable bracket allows the launch angle to be depressed for engaging targets at ranges of 50, 75 and 100 meters. The system enforces standoff distances and deters potential threats.

(4) The M1012 is a single projectile round made of hard rubber that is shaped like a bomblet and designed to be fired at a single target. With the muzzle velocity of 500 feet per second, the M1012 as the effective range of no closer that 5 meters and no further that 30 meters. Engagement inside of 5 meters could result in serious bodily injury or death. Beyond 30 meters the kinetic dissipates to the point where the round becomes ineffective.

(5) The M1013 is a multiple projectile round with .23 caliber hard rubber pellets that is designed to be fired at and employed with the purpose of affecting multiple targets. With a muzzle velocity of 900 feet per second, the M1013 has an effective range of no closer than 5 meters and no further that 30 meters. Engagements of less than 5 meter can result in seriously bodily injury or death. Beyond 30 meters the kinetic dissipates to the point where the round becomes ineffective

(6) The midsize riot control disperser (M37) is the size of a standard fire extinguisher that uses compressed air to force the RCA out to a range of 30 feet. It has the capacity to employ 18 burst of RCA into a hostile crowd while maintaining excellent standoff capabilities. The M37 can be refilled and is rechargeable. It can be refilled with CR solution (liquid agent) or CS (dry agent). For the purport of training the M37 can be filled with water and CS can be substituted with talcum power.

(7) The Squad riot control agent disperser (M33A1) is designed to provide crowd control and protection at the squad level. It is capable of projecting a ballistic stream of RCA's beyond 25 feet in up to 25 half- seconds burst. It consists of a frame and harness assembly, compressed-gas cylinder (agent container assembly) air pressure assembly, gun and hose assembly, multi-jet spray unit, and check valve assembly. The M33A1 can be refilled and is rechargeable. For training purposes, CR can be substituted with water and CS and be substituted with talcum power.

(8) The above mention items are but just a few of the non lethal weapons and munitions available to the commander and unit to utilize during a response to the civil disturbance, and can be utilized to train and prepare Soldiers. Additional non lethal weapons and munitions as well as protective gear can be found in FM 3-19.15.

3. Vehicles. Armored vehicles and transport vehicles add to the readiness of the crowd control force. The use of these vehicles increases flexibility, reduces troop commitments, and provides protection for personnel. In considering the use of vehicles, however, it must be remembered that they should be secured by foot elements.

a. Armored Security Vehicles (ASV) can be used in several ways to keep the effects of civil disturbances at a minimum.

(1) Their use adds a considerable psychological effect to riot control formations while providing added protection for Soldiers. They provide a readily accessible barrier for Soldiers to crouch behind if necessary, and excellent protection for those inside.

(2) Their use as mobile command posts offers the added advantages of security, communication, and mobility.

(3) They are well adaptable to roadblock operations providing the advantages listed above, while at the same time providing an excellent barrier.

(4) Their use for patrolling an area of violence adds to the psychological effect, and allows Soldiers to maneuver in close to snipers in order to make an apprehension.

b. Standard military transport vehicles can be modified with sandbags, armor plating, wire screening, or similar materials to give some protection against sniper fire and thrown objects. They provide mobility and communication capability for area coverage. Soldiers should be deployed with ample vehicles to provide sufficient flexibility to handle all situations in an area of civil disturbance. TOE allowances should probably be increased for this purpose.

3. Other Equipment. In addition to the special equipment discussed above, certain other items should be available for use in operations within the disturbance area.

a. Armored vests and protective masks are required for anti-sniping operations and at other times when violence is expected. Flexibility is an important consideration. For example, the limitation on visibility must be considered when requiring the use of protective masks, and the limitation on mobility when wearing the armored vests.

b. Successful conduct of the overall operation may depend on other items. Auxiliary lighting should be available to include hand-portable lights, vehicular-mounted searchlights, spotlights, flood-lights, flashlights, flares (with caution toward fires), and vehicle headlights. Prefabricated wood or metal barriers, or suitable materials, such as wire or ropes, may be used to block off an area; signs should be provided to supplement these barriers. Evidence equipment, including movie and still cameras with telescopic lenses, and recording devices should be obtained and placed into position.

c. Other items of equipment should also be provided. Helicopters should be used for observation, communication relay, illumination, resupply, reserve displacement, and numerous other tasks. Adequate firefighting and fire protection equipment are vital in civil disturbance.

d. Provisions should be made for appropriate communications equipment for use at the scene and between the scene and the operations headquarters. Every available means of communications to include public address systems--both hand-portable and vehicle-mounted--should be used.

PART E - Operational Tasks

1. General. In any civil disturbance operation, certain tasks must be accomplished to reach the ultimate objective of restoring and maintaining law and order. To do this, action must be taken to gain control of the situation. Control forces must perform certain tasks that will develop a physical and psychological environment which will permit law enforcement personnel to enforce the law and maintain order. The importance of having a high degree of flexibility and selectively in the response cannot be overemphasized. It is just as important that the tasks selected be completed only after a careful evaluation of the situation. This evaluation must consider the particular uniqueness of the situation. In this respect, the commander selects those tasks that are most likely to reduce the intensity of the given situation. Therefore, not all tasks will apply in all situations, but control force commanders and unit leaders must identify those tasks which must be performed and then develop plans and procedures for their accomplishment. The operational and integrated tasks listed below are discussed in detail in the paragraphs and lessons to follow.

a. Operational Tasks. (1) Isolate the area. (2) Secure likely targets. (3) Control crowds or mobs. (4) Establish area control. (5) Neutralize special threats.

b. Integrated Tasks.

(1) Gather, record, and report information. (2) Apprehend violators. (3) Maintain communications. (4) Maintain mobile reserves.

(5) Inform the public. (6) Protect the fire service operations. (7) Process detained personnel.

2. Isolate the Area.

a. This task includes the restriction and sealing off of the disturbed area. The objectives of sealing off the disturbed area are to prevent the disorder from spreading to unaffected areas, to prevent escape of persons bent on expanding the disturbance, to speed up the exit of the uninvolved, and to exclude unauthorized personnel from entering the affected area. In order to prevent the disturbance from expanding in size and strength, it is critical to prevent the inflow of extra demonstrators or curious onlookers into the disturbed area.

b. When military forces are committed to helping the civil authorities in controlling civil disturbances, the situation will be beyond the capability of local law enforcement agencies and a scene of major disorder should be expected. This disorder may be characterized by small, dispersed groups which are looting, burning, and generally causing havoc in the area, or it may be characterized by large groups participating in varying degrees of illegal conduct. The initial action taken by military forces to control the disorder is critical and should include the immediate isolation of the disturbed area.

c. The initial commitment of control force personnel may be required to clear a building or an area in order to isolate the persons creating the disturbance from those not yet motivated or actively involved. The primary emphasis should be on identifying what area and who has to be isolated.

3. Isolated Techniques. There are several techniques to use when isolating a disturbed area.

a. Barricades and Roadblocks. Barricades and roadblocks are physical barriers which deny or limit entry into and exit from the disturbed area. They can be used to totally deny passage of people and vehicles or to permit certain designated categories of persons and vehicles to pass. They must be positioned so as to prevent their being bypassed, surrounded, or cut off from support. In many cases, it may be impractical to physically seal an area due to the physical and geographical considerations, such as in the case of a college campus or a suburban area.

b. Barricades Against Personnel. Civil disturbance operations contingency planning should provide for the availability of portable barricades which slow down the passage of personnel. Concertina wire is a suitable material for rapid construction and effectiveness, although wooden sawhorses, ropes, and other field expedient devices may suffice. Concertina wire should be used sparingly and only under serious circumstances as it is indicative of violent disorders.

c. Roadblocks Against Vehicles. The erection of effective roadblocks which cannot be easily breached by vehicles requires large, heavy construction materials. One item that can be stockpiled in advance is 55- gallon drums to be filled with water or earth on site. Other materials include sandbags, earthworks, trees, or heavy vehicles. Several roadblocks placed at intervals of 25 to 50 feet provide sufficient depth to prevent breaches by heavy or high-speed vehicles.

d. Construction Considerations. The construction of barricades and roadblocks should provide cover from small arms fire where this threat is likely. Provisions should be for night illumination of approaches to the position; however, care must be taken not to silhouette the personnel manning it. Construction materials which would chip or shatter upon impact by thrown objects should be covered with canvas or sandbags to prevent injuries from flying fragments. Warning signs should be placed in front of the position directing authorized personnel not to approach the position. One technique of providing a quickly erected barrier is the use of vehicles parked bumper to bumper; however, this procedure may subject the vehicles to damage by a hostile crowd. Another device which may be effectively used both as a barricade and a part of a formation is the use of a locally built frame of wood or metal with wire covering.

e. Perimeter Patrols. Perimeter patrols should be established to prevent entry or exit from the disturbed area, particularly by persons or groups trying to bypass barricades and roadblocks. These patrols operate along the outer operational boundary of the disturbed area. Perimeter patrols can be integrated with area patrol routes within the disturbed area.

f. Pass and Identification Systems. Unit, installation, or municipal contingency planning should include a pass and identification system providing for the entry and exit of authorized personnel to and from the isolated area. Procedures should be established for press personnel, emergency medical personnel, public utility work crews, and for any other personnel who have a legitimate purpose for entering and exiting the isolated area. Consideration must be given to those persons residing within the disturbed area who must travel to and from work. An effective pass and identification system requires careful and detailed planning as a contingency measure.

g. Public Utility Control. Ensure that civil authorities have established a means for controlling public utilities to include street lights, gas, electric, water, and telephone services so that they may be turned on or off to support the tactics employed by the control forces.

4. Secure Likely Targets.

a. General. Certain buildings, utilities, and services are critical to the economic and physical well-being of a community and require security to prevent disruption of essential functions. In addition, certain facilities and buildings have become symbolic targets to radical or extremist elements and should be identified and afforded protection with the priorities established. Among the likely targets to be attacked are control force command posts, billeting areas, and motor parks. Another potential problem in civil disturbance operations is the threat posed by dissident elements intent on doing bodily harm to control force personnel and civilian dignitaries in the disturbed area. When such threats exist, military personnel may have to be committed to security operations. In particular, security must be placed on armories, arsenals, hardware, and sporting good stores, pawnshops, and gunsmith establishments, or other places where weapons or ammunition are stored. To conserve manpower, consideration may be given to evacuating sensitive items, such as weapons from stores and storing them in a central facility. Priorities for physical security must be established to prevent waste of available forces on less important facilities or those which have their own physical security forces. The degree of security necessary to protect various buildings and utilities is determined by considering the following: [..............]

It goes on.... Again the page is here. I'll leave it here to get this posted now. Check it out and be sure to get a handle on CONPLAN 3502 and other aspects of domestic military operations planning frameworks -- when similar emergency/disaster scenarios happen (i.e. Katrina) you see military personnel acting like this...

REX-84 under Iran Contra was 'then', and 'now' a literal US Army war to save the criminal banks from angry mobs is basically what's planned. Under this plan a nation ripped off & crippled by LIBOR peta-scale financial scams leaves forces like the military on the hook for defending the organized ring of criminals operating banks, i.e. "services ... critical to the economic... well-being of a community". What is the Pentagon supposed to do about the fact that the critical infrastructure is often operated by the criminally insane -- the very people who have pushed the US most of the way to the point where terrifying emergency plans like those above spring to life? X-(

Comedy Central has weird faux-subliminal meme campaign going on

Several videos and a GLP post cover the New Subliminal Messages on Comedy Channel. Looks like an internet meme campaign to me. Not too shabby though. The colored words (not all legible) form strange thoughts.... In the end the joke assures us they're in on it all. Thanks Viacom.

This one satirizes "the jocks in baseball caps and chinos screaming 'usa'" so credit there i guess.

Screen shot 2011-05-25 at 9.03.36 PM.png

here's the esoteric joke one:

Screen shot 2011-05-25 at 9.02.26 PM.png

gotta have mind control subliminal meta subliminal at hand:

Screen shot 2011-05-25 at 9.00.32 PM.png
More below the fold, why not?

Syndicate content