Uncategorized

UN-supported Ceasefire set for Sunday, 7 AM

Israel is tripling its ground forces in Lebanon for what will hopefully be the final scene in this strange war. Plenty of news on Haaretz in Israel and the Daily Star in Beirut. This is all for the moment:

Last update - 14:19 12/08/2006

TEXT: UN cease-fire resolution on conflict in Lebanon

By Reuters

Following is the text of the operative provisions of a draft resolution circulated to members of the UN Security Council on Friday. The preambular provisions have been omitted for reasons of length.

THE SECURITY COUNCIL, ...

Determining that the situation in Lebanon constitutes a threat to international peace and security;

1. Calls for a full cessation of hostilities based upon, in particular, the immediate cessation by Hezbollah of all attacks and the immediate cessation by Israel of all offensive military operations;

2. Upon full cessation of hostilities, calls upon the government of Lebanon and UNIFIL (The UN Interim Force in Lebanon) as authorized by paragraph 11 to deploy their forces together throughout the south and calls upon the government of Israel, as that deployment begins, to withdraw all of its forces from southern Lebanon in parallel;

3. Emphasizes the importance of the extension of the control of the government of Lebanon over all Lebanese territory in accordance with the provisions of resolution 1559 (2004) and resolution 1680 (2006), and of the relevant provisions of the Taif Accords, for it to exercise its full sovereignty, so that there will be no weapons without the consent of the government of Lebanon and no authority other than that of the government of Lebanon;

4. Reiterates its strong support for full respect for the Blue Line (separating Israel and Lebanon);

5. Also reiterates its strong support, as recalled in all its previous relevant resolutions, for the territorial integrity, sovereignty and political independence of Lebanon within its internationally recognized borders, as contemplated by the Israeli-Lebanese General Armistice Agreement of 23 March 1949;

6. Calls on the international community to take immediate steps to extend its financial and humanitarian assistance to the Lebanese people, including through facilitating the safe return of displaced persons and, under the authority of the government of Lebanon, reopening airports and harbors, consistent with paragraphs 14 and 15, and calls on it also to consider further assistance in the future to contribute to the reconstruction and development of Lebanon;

7. Affirms that all parties are responsible for ensuring that no action is taken contrary to paragraph 1 that might adversely affect the search for a long-term solution, humanitarian access to civilian populations, including safe passage for humanitarian convoys, or the voluntary and safe return of displaced persons, and calls on all parties to comply with this responsibility and to cooperate with the Security Council;

8. Calls for Israel and Lebanon to support a permanent cease-fire and a long-term solution based on the following principles and elements:

* full respect for the Blue Line by both parties,

* security arrangements to prevent the resumption of hostilities, including the establishment between the Blue Line and the Litani River of an area free of any armed personnel, assets and weapons other than those of the government of Lebanon and of UNIFIL as authorized in paragraph 11, deployed in this area

* full implementation of the relevant provisions of the Taif Accords, and of resolutions 1559 (2004) and 1680 (2006), that require the disarmament of all armed groups in Lebanon, so that, pursuant to the Lebanese cabinet decision of July 27, 2006, there will be no weapons or authority in Lebanon other than that of the Lebanese state

* no foreign forces in Lebanon without the consent of its government

* no sales or supply of arms and related materiel to Lebanon except as authorized by its government

* provision to the United Nations of all remaining maps of land mines in Lebanon in Israel's possession

9. Invites the Secretary-General (Kofi Annan) to support efforts to secure as soon as possible agreements in principle from the government of Lebanon and the government of Israel to the principles and elements for a long-term solution as set forth in paragraph 8, and expresses its intention to be actively involved

10. Requests the secretary-general to develop, in liaison with relevant international actors and the concerned parties, proposals to implement the relevant provisions of the Taif Accords, and resolutions 1559 (2004) and 1680 (2006), including disarmament, and for delineation of the international borders of Lebanon, especially in those areas where the border is disputed or uncertain, including by dealing with the Shaba Farms area, and to present to the Security Council those proposals within thirty days

11. Decides, in order to supplement and enhance the force in numbers, equipment, mandate and scope of operations, to authorize an increase in the force strength of UNIFIL to a maximum of 15,000 troops, and that the force shall, in addition to carrying out its mandate under resolutions 425 and 426 (1978)

a. Monitor the cessation of hostilities

b. Accompany and support the Lebanese armed forces as they deploy throughout the south, including along the Blue Line, as Israel withdraws its armed forces from Lebanon as provided in paragraph 2

c. Coordinate its activities related to paragraph 11 (b) with the government of Lebanon and the government of Israel

d. Extend its assistance to help ensure humanitarian access to civilian populations and the voluntary and safe return of displaced persons

e. Assist the Lebanese armed forces in taking steps towards the establishment of the area as referred to in paragraph 8

f. Assist the government of Lebanon, at its request, to implement paragraph 14

12. Acting in support of a request from the government of Lebanon to deploy an international force to assist it to exercise its authority throughout the territory, authorizes UNIFIL to take all necessary action in areas of deployment of its forces and as it deems within its capabilities, to ensure that its area of operations is not utilized for hostile activities of any kind, to resist attempts by forceful means to prevent it from discharging its duties under the mandate of the Security Council, and to protect United Nations personnel, facilities, installations and equipment, ensure the security and freedom of movement of United Nations personnel, humanitarian workers, and, without prejudice to the responsibility of the government of Lebanon, to protect civilians under imminent threat of physical violence

13. Requests the secretary general urgently to put in place measures to ensure UNIFIL is able to carry out the functions envisaged in this resolution, urges member states to consider making appropriate contributions to UNIFIL and to respond positively to requests for assistance from the force, and expresses its strong appreciation to those who have contributed to UNIFIL in the past

14. Calls upon the government of Lebanon to secure its borders and other entry points to prevent the entry in Lebanon without its consent of arms or related materiel and requests UNIFIL as authorized in paragraph 11 to assist the government of Lebanon at its request

15. Decides further that all states shall take the necessary measures to prevent, by their nationals or from their territories or using their flag vessels or aircraft,

(a) the sale or supply to any entity or individual in Lebanon of arms and related materiel of all types, including weapons and ammunition, military vehicles and equipment, paramilitary equipment, and spare parts for the aforementioned, whether or not originating in their territories, and

(b) the provision to any entity or individual in Lebanon of any technical training or assistance related to the provision, manufacture, maintenance or use of the items listed in subparagraph (a) above except that these prohibitions shall not apply to arms, related material, training or assistance authorized by the government of Lebanon or by UNIFIL as authorized in paragraph 11

16. Decides to extend the mandate of UNIFIL until 31 August 2007, and expresses its intention to consider in a later resolution further enhancements to the mandate and other steps to contribute to the implementation of a permanent cease-fire and a long-term solution

17. Requests the secretary-general to report to the council within one week on the implementation of this resolution and subsequently on a regular basis

18. Stresses the importance of, and the need to achieve, a comprehensive, just and lasting peace in the Middle East, based on all its relevant resolutions including its resolutions 242 (1967) of 22 November 1967 and 338 (1973) of 22 October 1973

19. Decides to remain actively seized of the matter.

Heart of Darkness; Ausfarht!

In what corner of our souls rests that savage part of man willing to breakdown the outside world on selfish command? What great honor should we extend to this beast? A kingdom, a gauntlet, a title, a feast? I know not what possesses me in the midst of drunken haze, but I have discovered a crack in the cloister, here in the heart of darkness. Peering through the crack, at once I realized the path which brought me here was of my own creation. The serpentine way it had twisted and tangled life and bound me in this maze. Surrounded on the outside by infinite cadavers, trapped in a gordian knot of my own rotten mind. In dim memory an image of colorful pastures, and a young boy staring hard at the cracks in the ground.

Img 0709-1

Last night I was a accused of stealing a bottle of beer from my good buddy in the cities. I had thought it was cool, or ok or something, I don't know, we were all pretty hammered. I had brought the wine, my other friend brought a couple beers, I also brought tea for my friend as a gift. So I had thought grabbing another beer was socially acceptable. But he accused me in front of his whole building, and they started talking shit to me which was horribly embarrassing, so I smashed it against the ground out front and left, at which point I was informed by my other friend that when I had gone looking for my backpack I had stumbled into the wrong apartment and stolen the beer from somebody elses fridge. Then when I tried to call he kept accusing me of stealing it, and passed the phone off to his little granola bitch friends who ragged on me for a good half hour or so. I suppose I deserved it, so to that kid I apologize, but I didn't steal your fucking beer. In no way shape or form.

Lebanese president vows national resistance to Israeli invasion forces

 Cnn 2006 World Meast 07 21 Cnna.Lahoud Story.Robertson2.Cnn"We're going to stay united, and that's what makes the strength of Lebanon. And we want ourselves to solve our problems, not to force these problems on us. Because when you force these problems, believe me, when we are united nobody can do it. And the proof is that when in 2000 nobody believed we could liberate our land, but we could do it because the Lebanese were united and the national army was with the united Lebanon and with the resistance."...

Peace for Strength: An Iron Wall and a Clean Break II

This post has been split because Movable Type Sucks... please continue reading!

Mr. Netanyahu has made clear that, like Mr. Reagan, he understands that negotiations with non-democratic adversaries require cautious realism. One cannot sensibly assume the other side's good faith. Democratic states can have peace only if they are strong and morally confident. Prudence requires anticipating treaty violations by the other side, so verifiability and compliance are of the essence (remember Mr. Reagan's "Trust - but verify"). These are still the themes of the conservative Republican mainstream. In congratulating Mr. Netanyahu on his victory, Sen. Bob Dole said, "I well understand Likud's emphasis on peace through strength." Such themes have been roundly ridiculed by journalists, but they helped the United States win the Cold War and Israelis evidently believe they can maximize Israel's chances of peace with security.

Likud's position on settlements reflects the peace-through-strength principle. The diplomacy of Israel's outgoing Labor Party government confirmed a lesson with long roots in Zionist history: Israel is unlikely over time to retain control over pieces of territory unless its people actually live there. Supporters of settlements reason: If Israelis do not settle an area in the territories, Israel will eventually be forced to relinquish it. If it relinquishes the territories generally, its security will be undermined and peace will therefore not be possible.

The Israeli left disagrees. The nature of the disagreement is similar to the main security controversy in the United States during the Cold War: Conservatives favored building up U.S. defense resources as the key to peace. Liberals argued that the build-up prevented peace by stimulating Soviet fear and hostility.

Mr. Netanyahu sounds Reaganite themes also when he talks of economics. He came to political maturity when he served in his first government post as No. 2 man in the Israeli Embassy in Washington during the early days of the "Reagan Revolution." He became a close friend and student of leading free-market exponents, especially in the neo-conservative movement.

Past leaders of Israel's secular right, Menachem Begin and Yitzhak Shamir, while not socialists, were not active anti-socialists. They were tough on security issues, but paid scant attention to economics and did little to dismantle the institutions of Israeli socialism. Mr. Netanyahu, in contrast, ascribes high importance to liberalizing the Israeli economy.

In this job, he will be getting powerful encouragement from his close personal friend Natan Sharansky, who will likely sit with him in the Cabinet. Mr. Sharansky, the former Soviet dissident, created a new political party, which won a large bloc of Knesset seats by arguing that only through free-market reform can Israel improve the situation of new immigrants and attract large numbers of additional immigrants.

Mr. Netanyahu's victory may actually bring about a substantial improvement in U.S.-Israeli relations. It would not be surprising if, on his first visit to Washington, he lays the groundwork for several departures that could prove popular here. He knows Israel can now begin to wean itself from U.S. economic aid, especially if it is serious about liberalizing the economy. He may propose a gradual phasing out of such aid. Also, he can announce, in contrast to his predecessors Messrs. Peres and Rabin that Israel now has no interest whatever in having U.S. troops stationed as peacekeepers on the Golan Heights and no interest in U.S. taxpayers "financing peace" with Syria's regime of Hafez Assad.

Also, Mr. Netanyahu can highlight Israel's interest in America's development of missile defenses. Mr. Peres and President Clinton gave lip service to cooperation in this field, but they focused narrowly on specific joint programs. Israel has an important stake not only in those programs, but in certain U.S. programs, like the one that would create a sea-based, wide-area defense system that would allow the United States, by stationing a single naval cruiser in the Eastern Mediterranean in a crisis, to add a valuable layer to Israel's missile defenses. Mr. Netanyahu knows that if he encourages Israel's friends in Congress to support such programs, he will create much good will with the broad-based forces in the United States, led by the top Republicans in Congress, that deem missile defense the gravest U.S. military deficiency.

The point is that there is more to the U.S.-Israeli relationship than whether Israel is going to relinquish territory to Syria or the Palestine Liberation Organization. Not every American is fixated on pressing Israel to make further withdrawals. Mr. Netanyahu may be able to alter the agenda of the relationship, giving Americans comfort that his policies are not only familiarly conservative, but more beneficial to U.S. interests than those of the Labor government.

This should give a few reference points about how Republicans and the Likud Party have a very powerful alliance - that has now transformed into an alliance with Kadima. There is a complex of morality and religion at work here, and the links between the West Bank settlement project and the wrath visited now upon Lebanon are clear to see, if you care to look.

Finally a break in the case

Img 3388

Img 3389

A very busy and weird first week of the summer. On the up side, I got a very well-paying job doing web development programming & such with the Macalester development office and a studio apartment back on Grand Avenue. The Mac job is probably only short-term but I'll learn ASP.NET, the industry standard of these things.

Good gig: Drupal now has the galleries in it Real Well

Heh, as it happened, the time where I set up the 'Drupal2' server and they migrated my site to the new server overlapped, such that the Drupal2 database was eaten by a grue and will never be heard from again. No matter, for I have gotten the main Drupal test server, located at

http://drupal.hongpong.com

to have the proper photo gallery features. There has been a bit of a learning curve to PowWeb's new administrative interface, but it is certainly an improvement, and the handy CGI error screen has been most helpful here.

Lazy summer days

I made some good bank working the state convention. Last night we were driving down 94 in pouring rain and lightning struck a transformer right next to us. It exploded in a huge hail of sparks, and at that moment we decided it was fate instructing us to go bowling at Minnehaha Lanes.

It's 6/6/06 and it's my dad's birthday. I am in fact Damien. Sorry, more updates later, perhaps tonight if you're good. Chairman Mao has promised to finally contribute some stuff this week, and in honor of that his icon has been changed to Aleister Crowley pouting.

Urgent: Pray For Me, For Tomorrow I Test My Mettle

From the Desk of Leroy Babolian:

Ninja

If this letter reaches you, it is likely that I am already dead. After careful deliberation, I have chosen the only operative in my stable of practitioners of the deadly arts capable of conducting the most daring mission yet planned in the history of the battle between good and evil: myself. Once again, I put myself in harm’s way, the ritual of taping my fists and feet for battle my only comfort in the face of almost certain annihilation. Despair not, though, dear friend, for though I may well die, I shall die executing my grandest design yet; a strike upon the rotten core of the forces of evil and iniquity in this world, a draining of the swamps of injustice in the name of the grasslands of righteousness.

Conservative Body Snatchers from Beyond the Moon

On the heels of HongPong's eminently successful revelation of government brainwashing, I want to briefly discuss a few of the issues he raises.

I start from the assumption that the purpose of PSYOPs in America is to mould public opinion enough that the White House can carry on its military operations unhindered. Personally, I feel that this is a low bar, since many "Joe Six Pack's" would need some significant negative revelations in order to dislodge his opinion enough to make it unpleasant for Bush - after all, responding negatively on an approval rating takes almost no effort, demonstrations, letters, etc. all take significantly more effort. This administration has shown us that feedback and accountability impose very little restrictions on the activities of the executive - that is, until voting season (hopefully, unfortunately we can't be confident about this either).

New To Me

New To Me But Not to You

Product Reviews and Culture Criticism Well Past Their Shelf Life

Yay

Hello, Hongsketeers, c'est moi. Today I will be bringing you a new feature, New to Me But Not to You, wherein I review movies, music and other consumer products months, years, or even decades after they come out. The point of this installment is to give you the reader and unbidden and undesired look into the lack of artistic, intellectual and culinary development in my life. By looking at the movies, music and food products that sustain me day-to-day, the utter vapidity of my existence, the complete senselessness of it, can be fully absorbed. And who knows, maybe you're a moron, too, in which case you might actually get something out of it.

Syndicate content